3796
M. Okada et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 49 (2008) 3794–3796
the photoreactive aryl azide unit in 2 is expected to interact
Lys(Boc)-
peptide synthesizer
with the binding site of the receptor. Thus, a higher yield
can be expected in cross-link formation by photo irradia-
tion. In addition, since several leaf movement factors pos-
sess a cis-p-coumaroyl moiety as well as 1,1,2 a similar
approach would be applicable to the detection of specific
receptors for other leaf-movement factors.
Arg(Pbf)-(Gly)3-FLAG(protection)-
10
1) 9, HBTU, HOBt, DIPEA,
NMP, rt
2) TFA/HFIP/CH2Cl2 (5/1/4)
0 ºC, dark, 4 h
References and notes
LOF photoaffinity probe 2
Fig. 4. Synthesis of the LOF photoaffinity probe 2.
1. Ueda, M.; Yamamura, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1400.
2. Ueda, M.; Nakamura, Y.; Okada, M. Pure Appl. Chem. 2007, 79, 519.
3. Ueda, M.; Tashiro, C.; Yamamura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
3253.
4. Satter, R. L.; Gorton, H. L.; Vogelmann, T. C. The Pulvinus: Motor
Organ for Leaf Movement; American Society of Plant Physiologists,
1990.
5. Nagano, H.; Kato, E.; Yamamura, S.; Ueda, M. Org. Biomol. Chem.
2003, 1, 3186.
6. Nakamura, Y.; Matsubara, A.; Okada, M.; Kumagai, T.; Ueda, M.
Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 744.
7. Hopp, T. P.; Prickett, K. S.; Price, V. L.; Libby, R. T.; March, C. J.;
Ceretti, D. P.; Urdal, D. L.; Conlon, P. J. Biotechnology 1988, 6, 1204.
8. Hatanaka, Y.; Sadakane, Y. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2002, 2, 271.
9. Sonogashira, K. In Metal-Catalyzed Cross-coupling Cross-Cou-
plingReactions; Diederich, F., Stang, P. J., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weiheim, Germany, 1998; pp 203–229.
10. The intermediate 9: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): d 7.66 (d, 1H,
J = 8.3 Hz), 7.30 (d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.10 (d, 1H, J = 12.5 Hz), 6.92
(d, 2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 6.74–6.70 (m, 2H), 5.89 (d, 1H, J = 12.5 Hz), 5.01
(s, 2H), 3.81 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): d 171.3, 160.8,
159.6, 140.7, 140.1, 132.7, 129.3, 128.1, 119.0, 118.1, 114.1, 110.6,
104.6, 70.1, 55.3; ESI-HRMS calcd for C17H15N3O4Na [M+Na]+
348.0955, found 348.0954.
11. The LOF analog 3: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD): d 7.39 (d, 1H,
J = 8.5 Hz), 6.77 (d, 1H, J = 12.4 Hz), 6.61 (d, 1H, J = 2.3 Hz), 6.53
(dd, 1H, J = 8.5, 2.3 Hz), 5.88 (d, 1H, J = 12.4 Hz), 3.22–3.19 (m,
2H), 3.18–3.16 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.52 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CD3OD): d 170.0, 160.6, 158.6, 140.9, 133.6, 132.8, 123.3, 119.8,
113.0, 105.6, 42.1, 39.6, 27.5, 27.2; ESI-HRMS calcd for C14H19N7O2
[M+H]+ 318.1673, found 318.1672.
light immediately and was demonstrated to be a good
photoreactive analog of 1.
Based on the successful degradation of 3, we designed an
efficient probe for photoaffinity-labeling and immunopre-
cipitation of the receptor for 1. Although biotinylated
photoaffinity probes are usually used to identify binding
proteins of small bioactive molecules,8,12 it has been
reported that purification based on biotin–avidin chemistry
is often associated with high non-specific binding due the
prevalence of numerous endogenous biotinylated proteins
in the cell.12,13 We designed photoaffinity probe 2 using a
FLAG segment as an antigen because the FLAG peptide
is widely used as a peptide tag for immunoprecipitation
purification using anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody.7 Since
it is already known that the substitution of the agmatine
moiety in 1 with arginine does not affect biological activ-
ity,5,6 the FLAG peptide was introduced through peptide
linkage. The synthesis of 2 was easily achieved using
solid-phase peptide synthesis (Fig. 4). The protected
dodecapeptide (10) on the polymer support was coupled
with intermediate 9. After acidic cleavage from the resin,
the mixture was purified by HPLC to give the desired
photoaffinity probe (2).14 In a bioassay, probe 2 was
approximately half as effective as 1, and showed potent
leaf-opening activity in A. saman at 500 lM. Despite the
addition of the large FLAG segment, probe 2 retained its
leaf-opening activity, which is three-fifth strong as that of
natural LOF. This relative biological activity would be
enough for future study on the purification of receptor of
LOF.6 Thus, we successfully synthesized biologically active
photoaffinity probe 2 containing an aryl azide unit and a
FLAG segment.
12. Sugimoto, T.; Fujii, T.; Idutu, Y.; Yamamura, S.; Ueda, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 335.
13. Masuoka, J.; Guthrie, L. N.; Hazen, K. C. Microbiology 2002, 148,
1073.
14. The LOF photoaffinity probe 2: 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O): d 7.16 (d,
1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.07 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.90 (d, 1H, J = 12.5 Hz),
6.81 (d, 2H, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.62 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz), 6.07
(d, 1H, J = 12.5 Hz), 4.62–4.54 (m, 5H), 4.49 (t, 1H, J = 6.8 Hz), 4.30
(dd, 1H, J = 7.4, 6.6 Hz), 4.20–4.15 (m, 2H), 4.03–3.92 (m, 6H), 3.05–
2.94 (m, 10H), 2.76–2.67 (m, 3H), 2.66–2.59 (m, 4H), 2.50 (dd, 1H,
J = 8.7, 15.2 Hz), 1.84–1.63 (m, 8H), 1.39–1.27 (m, 8H); ESI-HRMS
calcd for C62H88N20O26 [M+2H]2+ 764.3084, found 764.3086.
Given that a previous study revealed that the cis-p-cou-
maroyl moiety of 1 was essential for leaf-opening activity,5