3246
L. Guo et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18 (2008) 3242–3247
Table 4. MCR activity profiles and oral bioavailability data of selected
MC4R modulators
References and notes
1. (a) Emmerson, P. J.; Fisher, M. J.; Yan, L. Z.; Mayer, J.
P. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 1121; (b) Nargund, R.
P.; Strack, A. M.; Fong, T. M. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49,
4035; (c) Zimanyi, I. A.; Pelleymounter, M. A. Curr.
Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 627; Van der (d) Ploeg, L. H. T.;
Howard, A. D.; Nargund, R. P.; Austin, C. P.; Guan, X.;
Drisko, J.; Cashen, D.; Sebhat, I.; Pattchett, A. A.;
Figueroa, D. J.; DiLella, A. G.; Connolly, D. H.;
Weinberg, D. H.; Tan, C. T.; Palyha, O. C.; Pong, S.;
MacNeil, T.; Rosenblum, C.; Vongs, A.; Tang, R.; Yu, H.;
Sailer, A. W.; Fong, T. M.; Huang, C.; Tota, M.; Chang,
R. S.; Sterns, R.; Tamvakopoulos, T.; Christ, G.; Drazen,
D. L.; Spar, B. D.; Nelson, R. J.; Maclntyre, D. E. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 11381; (e) Eberle, A. N.
In The melanocortin receptorsMelanocortin Receptors;
Cone, R. D., Ed.; Human Press, 2000; p 3; (f) Huszar,
D.; Lynch, C. A.; Fairchild-Huntress, V.; Dunmore, J. H.;
Fang, Q.; Berkemeier, L. R.; Gu, W.; Kesterson, R. A.;
Boston, B. A.; Cone, R. D.; Smith, F. J.; Campfield, L. A.;
Burn, P.; Lee, F. Cell 1997, 88, 131; (g) Gu, W.; Tu, Z.;
Kleyn, P. W.; Kissebah, A.; Duprat, L.; Lee, J.; Chin, W.;
Maruti, S.; Deng, N.; Fisher, S. L.; Franco, L. S.; Burn,
P.; Yagaloff, K. A.; Nathan, J.; Heymsfield, S.; Albu, J.;
Pi-Sunyer, F. X.; Allison, D. B. Diabetes 1999, 48, 635; (h)
Hinney, A.; Schmidt, A.; Nottebom, K.; Heibult, O.;
Becker, I.; Ziegler, A.; Gerber, G.; Sina, M.; Gorg, T.;
Mayer, H.; Hebebrand, J. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.
1999, 84, 1483.
2. (a) Ujjainwalla, FerozeF.; Sebhat, Iyassu K. I. K. Curr.
Top. Med. Chem. 2007, 7, 1068; (b) Sebhat, I. K.; Lai, Y.;
Barakat, K.; Ye, Z.; Tang, R.; Kalyani, R. N.; Vongs, A.;
MacNeil, T.; Weinberg, D. H.; Cabello, M. A.; Maroto,
M.; Teran, A.; Fong, T. M.; Van der Ploeg, L. H. T.;
Patchett, A. A.; Nargund, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2007, 17(20), 5720; (c) Ye, Z.; Guo, L.; Barakat, K. J.;
Pollard, P. G.; Palucki, B. L.; Sebhat, I. K.; Bakshi, R. K.;
Tang, R.; Kalyani, R. N.; Vongs, A.; Chen, A. S.; Chen, H.
Y.; Rosenblum, C. I.; MacNeil, T.; Weinberg, D. H.; Peng,
Q.; Tamvakopoulos, C.; Miller, R. R.; Stearns, R. A.;
Cashen, D. E.; Martin, W. J.; Metzger, J. M.; Strack, A.
M.; MacIntyre, D. E.; Van der Ploeg, L. H. T.; Patchett, A.
A.; Wyvratt, M. J.; Nargund, R. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2005, 15, 3501; (d) Ujjainwalla, F.; Warner, D.;
Snedden, C.; Grisson, R. D.; Walsh, T. F.; Wyvratt, M. J.;
Kalyani, R. N.; Mac Neil, T.; Tang, R.; Weinberg, D. H.;
Van der Ploeg, L.; Goulet, M. T. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2005, 15, 4023; (e) Pan, K.; Scott, M. K.; Lee, D. H. S.;
Fitzpatrick, L. J.; Crooke, J. J.; Rivero, R. A.; Rosenthal,
D. I.; Vaidya, A. H.; Zhao, B.; Reitz, A. B. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2003, 11, 185; (f) Sebhat, I. K.; Martin, W. J.; Ye, Z.;
Barakat, K.; Mosley, R. T.; Johnston, D. B. R.; Bakshi, R.;
Palucki, B.; Weinberg, D. H.; MacNeil, T.; Kalyani, R. N.;
Tang, R.; Sterns, R. A.; Miller, R.; Tamvakopoulos, C.;
Strack, A.; McGowan, E.; Cashen, D. E.; Drisko, J. E.;
Hom, G. J.; Howard, A. D.; MacIntyre, D. E.; Van der
Ploeg, L. H. T.; Patchett, A. A.; Nargund, R. A. J. Med.
Chem. 2002, 45, 4589.
Compound
Receptor
Binding
IC50
(nM)
cAMP
EC50
(nM)
% acti.
at 10
lMa
F%b
6B
hMC1b
hMC3
hMC4
hMC5
rMC4
1339
1492
6.2
905
249.9
2.7
57
92
97
98
106
24.3
129.4
—
372
0.9
7B
hMC1b
hMC3
hMC4
hMC5
rMC4
695
1050
4.0
273.6
97.4
2.1
57
88
100
88
94
24.7
3.8
65.3
1.7
101.6
0.5
8B
hMC1b
hMC3
hMC4
hMC5
rMC4
311.6
2958
11.2
205
—
156.7
4.6
—
91
100
101
—
166.7
—
—
14B
7A
hMC1b
hMC3
hMC4
hMC5
rMC4
6586
12,240
76.2
675
—
—
10
16
47
35
—
15.0
34.3
28.0
30.3
120.5
1233
—
—
hMC1b
hMC3
hMC4
hMC5
rMC4
173,500
2951
4.1
1065
917.5
13.4
455
33
38
33
30
44
280.3
1.5
10.3
12A
4A
hMC1b
hMC3
hMC4
hMC5
rMC4
16,370
3777
7.8
—
—
—
—
—
5
8
1
450
1.0
11
15
hMC1b
hMC3
hMC4
hMC5
rMC4
20,000
4293
3.3
—
—
3
5
—
1
245.4
0.5
1600
—
10
6
a Percentage of cAMP accumulation at 10 lM relative to a–MSH.
b Compounds were dosed in Sprague–Dawley rats as a solution in
EtOH/PEG/saline (1:4:5) at 1 mg/kg, iv (n = 2) and 4 mg/kg, po
(n = 3).
4A exhibits excellent selectivity against MC1bR (>6000-
fold) and MC3R (>1000-fold). Both compounds showed
good PK profiles in rats with good drug level and
low plasma clearance rate (4A, AUCN = 0.70 lM h;
CLp =11.4 ml/min/kg; 12A, AUCN = 1.9 lM h; CLp =
5.6 ml/min/kg).
3. Ujjainwalla, F. Presentation (MEDI-275), 230th ACS
National Meeting, Washington, DC, August 28–September
1, 2005.
4. Ujjainwalla, F et al., unpublished results (in preparation).
5. Intermediate 3B was synthesized in a similar way as
described in Ref. 3 for compound 1.
6. (a) MC4R binding IC50 was defined as the concentration
of compound that can inhibit binding of [125 I]NDP-a-
MSH by 50% from membranes prepared from CHO cells
expressing human MC4R. Agonist potency was deter-
In conclusion, we have described the synthesis, SAR and
pharmacokinetics of a new class of non-peptidyl mela-
nocortin subtype-4 receptor modulators derived from a
tert-butyl pyrrolidine core structure. A number of po-
tent, MC4R selective and orally bioavailable agonists
have been discovered. The in vivo efficacy studies in
terms of lowering food intake and body weight and
showing erectile activity for MC4R agonists will be dis-
cussed in future reports from this laboratory.