2520
A. Huang et al.
LETTER
groups with TMSCF3. We treated a variety of nitriles with showed that TBABF could be used instead of TBAF in the
TMSCF3 and commercially available TBABF as a pro- trifluoromethylation of aldehydes and ketones. Further
moter in anhydrous THF at room temperature, and our expansion of the reaction scope using electrophiles such
findings are summarized in Table 2.17
as imines and nitrones and examination of other perfluo-
roalkylation reactions will be reported in due course.
Evaluation of the reaction scope highlights a substrate
profile that tolerates a variety of substitutions. In general,
the yields vary from moderate to high. Electron-with-
drawing groups are likely to polarize the nitrile bond,
which would facilitate the trifluoromethylation reaction
(entries 6–10). In the case of electron-donating groups, the
observed yields were low to moderate, with the dimethy-
laniline being the least reactive substrate tested. The X-
ray structure18 of the sulfonamide product (Table 2, entry
10) was obtained and unambiguously shows the formation
of the bistrifluoromethylated amine.
Acknowledgment
We thank Tarek Mansour, Neelu Kaila, Kathy Lee, and Zhao-Kui
Wan for helpful discussions.
References and Notes
(1) See Special Issue, Fluorine in Life Sciences: ChemBioChem
2004, 5, 557.
(2) Muller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Science 2007, 317, 1881.
(3) Hiyama, T. In Organofluorine Compounds: Chemistry and
Applications; Yamamoto, H., Ed.; Springer: New York,
2000.
(4) Reichenbächer, K.; Süss, K. I.; Hulliger, J. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2005, 34, 22.
(5) Hagmann, W. K. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4359.
(6) Prakash, G. K. S.; Yudin, A. K. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 757.
(7) Zard, S. Z. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2007, 5, 205.
(8) Prakash, G. K. S.; Krishnamurti, R.; Olah, G. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 393.
(9) Wiedmann, J.; Heiner, T.; Mloston, G.; Prakash, G. S. K.;
Olah, G. A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 820.
(10) Nelson, D. W.; Owens, J.; Hiraldo, D. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 2572.
(11) Prakash, G. K. S.; Mogi, R.; Olah, G. A. Org. Lett. 2006, 8,
3589.
With a few exceptions, N–H imines have been reported as
unstable and difficult to isolate. However, Gosselin et al.19
reported that solvolysis of N-TMS-ketimines in MeOH
proceeds readily with cleavage of the nitrogen–silicon
bond and isolation of stable N–H trifluoromethylimines.
We believe that the trifluoromethylation reaction goes
through similar intermediates (Figure 1) where the initial
addition of the CF3 group to the nitrile provides trifluo-
romethylimine intermediates followed by a second CF3
addition to afford the desired bistrifluoromethylamines.
F3C
N
F3C
NH
SiMe3
Ar
Ar
(12) Gale, D. M.; Krespan, C. G. J. Org. Chem. 1968, 33, 1002.
(13) Nesi, M.; Brasca, M. G.; Longo, A.; Moretti, W.; Panzeri, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 4881.
Figure 1 Potential imine intermediates for the addition of TMSCF3
to aryl nitriles
(14) Sun, H.; DiMagno, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2050.
(15) Sharma, R. K.; Fry, J. L. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2112.
(16) Bosh, P.; Camps, F.; Chamarro, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987,
28, 4733.
(17) Typical Procedure for Trifluoromethylation of Various
Nitriles Promoted by TBABF
Since the discovery of the direct trifluoromethylation
reaction of carbonyl compounds with TMSCF3 by
Prakash et al.,8 the most commonly used sources of fluo-
rine include TBAF and cesium fluoride. We wondered if
TBABF could also catalyze the trifluoromethylation of al-
dehydes and ketones. Examples of substrates containing
an aldehyde and a ketone are shown in Scheme 1. 2-Naph-
thylaldehyde and 2¢-acetonaphthone reacted in the pres-
ence of TMSCF3 and a catalytic amount of TBABF to
provide the desired trifluoromethyl alcohols in 95% and
92% yields, respectively.
Biphenyl-4-carbonitrile (110 mg, 0.61 mmol) was dissolved
in THF (4 mL). Under nitrogen at 0 °C (trifluoromethyl)tri-
methylsilane (0.45 mL, 3.05 mmol, 5 equiv) was added. To
this mixture was then added TBAF·HF (0.360 g, 1.28 mmol,
2.1 equiv) solution in THF (4 mL). The cooling bath was
removed, and the reaction mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 2
h. The reaction mixture was concentrated under rotary
vacuum to give a light yellow gum. Column chromatog-
raphy of the residue (silica gel, hexane–EtOAc = 5:1)
provided 2-biphenyl-4-yl-1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoropropan-2-
amine (154 mg, 79%) as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 7.83 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2 H), 7.63–7.69 (m, 2 H),
7.56–7.63 (m, 2 H), 7.42–7.50 (m, 2 H), 7.35–7.42 (m, 1 H),
2.20 (br s, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): d = 143.2,
140.3, 129.7, 129.3, 128.3, 128.2, 127.7, 127.6, 124.3 (q,
J = 286.9 Hz), 65.4 (spt, J = 27.8 Hz). HRMS (ESI+): m/z
calcd for C15H12F6N [M + H]+: 320.08684; found [M + H]+:
320.08670.
HO
O
R
1. TMSCF3
TBABF(cat.)
0 °C to r.t., 2 h
R
CF3
2. TBAF
R = H, yield = 95%
R = Me, yield = 92%
Scheme 1 TBABF-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of aldehydes and
ketones
(18) CCDC 729907 contains the supplementary crystallographic
data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge
from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
(19) Gosselin, F.; O’Shea, P. D.; Roy, S.; Reamer, R. A.; Chen,
C.; Volante, R. P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 355.
In conclusion, we report the first example of direct triflu-
oromethylation of nitriles using TMSCF3. This reaction is
promoted by TBABF and provides bistrifluomethylated
amines in moderate to good yields. TBABF is not as hy-
droscopic as TBAF and is more thermally stable. We also
Synlett 2009, No. 15, 2518–2520 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York