M. Fujinaga et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1565–1568
1567
Table 1
Radioactivity (% of injected dose/g tissue: mean SD, n = 3) in the brain and blood of mice at 1, 5, 15, 30, and 60 min after injection
Tissue
Brain
Time (min)
[
11C]2
[
11C]3
[
11C]4
[
11C]5
1
5
15
30
60
1.93 0.15
1.87 0.24
1.50 0.14
1.09 0.05
0.65 0.05
1.94 0.29
2.07 0.13
1.77 0.12
0.96 0.08
0.45 0.05
1.20 0.13
1.29 0.10
1.10 0.09
0.85 0.15
0.62 0.12
1.54 0.04
1.63 0.26
1.01 0.10
0.56 0.04
0.18 0.02
Blood
1
5
15
30
60
3.90 0.14
2.12 0.10
2.25 0.51
2.38 0.13
2.27 0.13
2.20 0.33
1.18 0.24
0.70 0.03
0.35 0.03
0.37 0.28
2.71 0.32
2.93 0.17
3.45 0.24
3.42 0.35
3.38 0.04
1.56 0.12
1.00 0.03
0.63 0.15
0.36 0.04
0.21 0.05
percentage of the injected dose per gram of wet tissue (% ID/g).
Radioactivity measurements were corrected for decay.
[
11C]3 and [11C]5 may become promising PET ligands for in vivo
imaging of the CB2 receptor in the brain.
Table 1 shows uptakes of [11C]2–5 in the brain and blood of
mice after injection at different time points. These radioligands en-
tered the brain rapidly and their maximum radioactivity levels
reached >1.2% ID/g, indicating that they could pass through the
BBB. This is a prerequisite for a good PET ligand used in brain imag-
ing, and was probably due to their high lipophilicity (clog D >4;
Pallas 3.4 Software). Although the maximum brain uptakes of
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research for the Molecular Imaging Program from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Government
of Japan.
[
11C]2–5 were half-fold lower than those of [11C]1a and [18F]1b,
their radioactivity levels in the brain were higher than those of
some useful PET probes17–19 developed by us for clinical brain
imaging. Uptakes of alcohols [11C]2 and [11C]3 in the brain were
higher than those of ketones [11C]4 and [11C]5. After initial uptakes,
the radioactivity levels of [11C]2–5 in the brain decreased over
time, and their brain washout expressed as 1 min/60 min ratio ID
was 2.9, 4.3, 1.9, and 8.6, respectively.
References and notes
1. Matsuda, L. A.; Lolait, S. J.; Brownstein, M. J.; Young, A. C.; Bonner, T. I. Nature
1990, 346, 561.
2. Munro, S.; Thomas, K. L.; Abu-Shaar, M. Nature 1993, 365, 61.
3. Lynn, A. B.; Herkenham, M. J. Pharmcol. Exp. Ther. 1994, 268, 1612.
4. Onaivi, E. S. Neuropsychobiology 2006, 54, 231.
5. Maresz, K.; Carrier, E. J.; Ponomarev, E. D.; Hillard, C. J.; Dittel, B. N. J.
Neurochem. 2005, 95, 437.
In the blood, [11C]2–5 displayed a different pattern of uptake
over time and dimethoxy [11C]2 displayed a slow decrease of radio-
activity in the blood. Uptake of another dimethoxy [11C]4 did not
reduce and its uptake at 60 min even increased by 1.2-fold in com-
parison with that at 1 min after injection. This result may be re-
lated to the high lipophilicity (clog D = 5.7) of [11C]4. A high
lipophilic ligand could bind to plasma proteins, which would sig-
nificantly obstruct its penetration into the brain. Indeed, among
the radioligands in the present study, the maximum uptake of
6. Palazuelos, J.; Aguado, T.; Pazos, M. R.; Julien, B.; Carrasco, C.; Resel, E.; Sagreda,
O.; Benito, C.; Romero, J.; Azcoitia, I.; Fernandez-Ruiz, J.; Guzman, M.; Galve-
Roerh, I. Brain 2009, 132, 3152.
7. Palazuelos, J.; Aguado, T.; Egia, A.; Mechoulam, R.; Guzman, M.; Galve-Roperh,
I. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2405.
8. Miller, A. M.; Stella, N. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 153, 299.
9. Horti, A. G.; Fan, H.; Kuwabara, H.; Hilton, J.; Ravert, H. T.; Holt, D. P.;
Alexander, M.; Kumar, A.; Rahmim, A.; Scheffel, U.; Wong, D. F.; Dannals, R. F. J.
Nucl. Med. 2006, 47, 1689.
10. Burns, H. D.; Van Laere, K.; Sanabria-Bohorquez, S.; Hamill, T. G.; Bormans, G.;
Eng, W. S.; Gibson, R.; Ryan, C.; Connolly, B.; Patel, S.; Krause, S.; Vanko, A.; Van
Hecken, A.; Dupont, P.; De Lepeleire, I.; Rothenberg, P.; Stoch, S. A.; Cote, J.;
Hagmann, W. K.; Jewell, J. P.; Lin, L. S.; Liu, P.; Goulet, M. T.; Gottesdiener, K.;
Wagner, J. A.; de Hoon, J.; Mortelmans, L.; Fong, T. M.; Hargreaves, R. J. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104, 9800.
11. Donohue, S. R.; Krushinski, J. H.; Pike, V. W.; Chernet, E.; Phebus, L.; Chesterfield,
A. K.; Felder, C. C.; Halldin, C.; Schaus, J. M. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 5833.
12. Terry, G. E.; Liow, J. S.; Zoghbi, S. S.; Hirvonen, J.; Farris, A. G.; Lerner, A.;
Tauscher, J. T.; Schaus, J. M.; Phebus, L.; Felder, C. C.; Morse, C. L.; Hong, J. S.;
Pike, V. W.; Halldin, C.; Innis, R. B. Neuroimage 2009, 48, 362.
13. Evens, N.; Bosier, B.; Lavey, B. J.; Kozlowski, J. A.; Vermaelen, P.; Baudemprez,
L.; Busson, R.; Lambert, D. M.; Van Laere, K.; Verbruggen, A. M.; Bormans, G. M.
Nucl. Med. Biol. 2008, 35, 793.
[
11C]4 in the brain was the lowest.
11C]3 and [11C]5 displayed rapid decrease of radioactivity in the
[
blood in contrast to [11C]2 and [11C]4. Uptakes of [11C]3 and [11C]5
at 60 min reduced to 17% and 13% of their values at 1 min, respec-
tively. Their ID ratios of brain/blood increased over time after
injection. The maximum value was 2.7 for [11C]3 at 30 min, 1.7
for [11C]5 at 15 min, whereas that was 0.9 for [11C]2 at 5 min and
0.4 for [11C]4 at 5 min. These results suggest that [11C]3 and
[
[
11C]5 have more suitable in vivo properties in the brain than do
11C]2 and [11C]4.
14. Evens, N.; Muccioli, G. G.; Houbrechts, N.; Lambert, D. M.; Verbruggen, A. M.;
Van Laere, K.; Bormans, G. M. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009, 36, 455.
15. Moore, B. M. II; Bhattacharjee, H.; Yates, C. R.; Stuart, L. WO 2008/109027.
We did not measure the radioactivity concentrations of [11C]2–
16. Compound
2
(30,50-dichloro-2,6-dimethoxybiphenyl-4-yl)(thiophen-2-yl)metha-
5 in the mouse brain regions because of the possible low density
and unclear distribution of the CB2 receptor in the brain.4 It has
been reported that the CB2 receptor was increased in microglia
activated by brain injury and neuroinflammation.5,6 Based on the
brain kinetics of [11C]5, it is worth characterizing whether [11C]5
has in vivo specific binding with the CB2 receptor in the brain.
Due to its similar structure and brain kinetics with [11C]5, [11C]3
derived from the reduction of [11C]5 may also be a promising radi-
oligand for brain imaging, although the affinity of 3 for the CB2
receptor still needs to be measured. We are currently using inflam-
matory animal models to evaluate the potential of [11C]3 and
nol): White powder; mp: 158–160 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) d: 3.68
(s, 6H), 5.96 (d, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 6.31 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 6.85 (s, 2H), 6.93–6.97
(m, 2H), 7.23 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (dd, J = 1.5, 3.3 Hz, 1H), 7.50 (t, J = 2.0 Hz,
1H); GC–MS (EI), m/z: 394.
Compound 3 (30,50-dichloro-2-hydroxy-6-methoxybiphenyl-4-yl)(thiophen-2-yl)-
methanol): White powder; mp: 124–126 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) d:
3.67 (s, 3H), 5.86 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 6.22 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 1H), 6.67 (s, 2H), 6.93–
6.96 (m, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 2.1 Hz, 2H), 7.39–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.47 (t, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H),
9.58 (s,1H); GC–MS (EI), m/z: 380.
Compound
4
(30,50-dichloro-2,6-dimethoxybiphenyl-4-yl)(thiophen-2-yl)metha-
none): White powder; mp: 203–205 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 3.80 (s,
6H), 7.12 (s, 2H), 7.21 (t, J = 4.4 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (t,
J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.76–7.77 (m, 2H); High-resolution MS (FAB), m/z: 393.0084
(calculated for C19H15O3Cl2S, 393.0119).
[
11C]5 for the CB2 receptor in the brain.
Compound 5 (30,50-dichloro-2-hydroxy-6-methoxybiphenyl-4-yl)(thiophen-2-yl)-
methanone): Yellow powder; mp: 199–201 °C; 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) d:
3.76 (s, 3H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 0.9 Hz,
In conclusion, four novel radioligands [11C]2–5 were synthe-
sized and they exhibited relatively high uptakes into mouse brains.