8550
O. Provot et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005)8547–8550
chlorides since large rate enhancements were observed
reducing the reaction time to 0.5–2 h at room tempera-
ture compared to 5–12 h when using palladium catalyst
ligated with triphenylphosphine.9 Consequently, we
undertook to use these conditions in our synthesis of
CA-4 analogues.
Acknowledgements
´
Mrs. Sylvianne Thoret, Dr. Daniel Guenard and Dr.
Thierry Cresteil, from the ICSN-CNRS, are gratefully
acknowledged for accurate tubulin tests and in vitro
cytotoxicity evaluations.
The desired Z-enediynes 4a–e were prepared from pure
trimethoxyphenylchloroenyne 6. The synthesis of func-
tionalized 1-alkynes 7d and 7e as second partners for these
coupling reactions were obtained from functionalized aryl
iodides 9 and 10 using the two steps sequence S–L-cou-
pling with trimethylsilylacetylene14 followed by desilyl-
ation under alkaline conditions as outlined in Scheme 3.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be
When Z-trimethoxychloroenyne 6 was treated under the
reaction conditions previously reported (5 mol %
PdCl2(PhCN)2, 10 mol % CuI, piperidine), we were
pleased to observe that the expected cross-coupled
enediynes 4 were obtained in reasonable to good yields
(38–73% unoptimized). In order to check the versatility
of this coupling methodology, we have prepared ene-
diyne 4a this time, from trimethoxyaryl alkyne 5 and
the Z-chloroenyne 8a in an excellent overall yield
(86%, Table 2, entry 1).
References and notes
1. Pettit, G. R.; Singh, S. B.; Niven, M. L.; Hamel, E.;
Schmidt, J. M. J. Nat. Prod. 1987, 50, 119.
2. Pettit, G. R.; Singh, S. G.; Boyd, M. R.; Hamel, E.; Pettit,
R. K.; Schmidt, J. M.; Hogan, F. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38,
1666.
3. (a) McGown, A. T.; Fox, B. W. Anti-Cancer Drug Des.
1989, 3, 249; (b) Aleksandrzak, K.; McGown, A. T.;
Hadfield, J. A. Anti-Cancer Drugs 1998, 9, 545.
4. Srivastava, V.; Negi, A. S.; Kumar, J. K.; Gupta, M. M.;
Khanuja, S. P. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13, 5892.
5. Getahum, Z.; Jurd, L.; Chu, P. S.; Lin, C. M.; Hamel, E.
J. Med. Chem. 1992, 35, 1058.
6. Cushman, M.; Nagarathnam, D.; Gopal, D.; Chakraborti,
A. K.; Lin, C. M.; Hamel, E. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2579.
7. Linstrumelle, G.; Alami, M. In (E)- and (Z)-Dichloro-
ethylene in Encyclopedia of Reagents for Organic Synthesis;
Paquette, L., Ed.; Wiley: Chichester, 1995; Vol. 3, p 1710.
Compounds 2, 3 and 4 were tested for their ability to
interact with tubulin (polymerization and depolymeriza-
tion) and for cytotoxicity against KB, MCF7 and
MCF7R cell lines.
However, most compounds did not inhibit the tubulin
polymerization and depolymerization. Only enyne 2b
and enediyne 4e were found to be active (e.g.,
6.5 · 10À5 and 6.8 · 10À5 M, respectively), but 50-fold
less active than CA-4. Moreover, if the cytotoxicity of
compounds 2–4 against KB, MCF7 and MCF7R cell
lines was comparable to other previously described ana-
logues, it was clearly less cytotoxic than combretastatin.
´
8. (a) Ramiandrasoa, P.; Brehon, B.; Thivet, A.; Alami, M.;
Cahiez, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2447; (b) Alami,
M.; Ramiandrasa, P.; Cahiez, G. Synlett 1998, 325; (c)
Peyrat, J.-F.; Thomas, E.; LÕHermite, N.; Alami, M.;
Brion, J.-D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6703.
9. (a) Alami, M.; Linstrumelle, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991,
32, 6109; (b) Alami, M.; Crousse, B.; Ferri, F. J.
Organomet. Chem. 2001, 624, 114.
10. (a) Sonogashira, K.; Tokai, Y.; Hagihara, N. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1975, 4467; (b) Alami, M.; Gueugnot, S.;
Domingues, E.; Linstrumelle, G. Tetrahedron 1995, 51,
1209.
11. Compound 5 has been prepared from the corresponding
aldehyde by Corey–Fuchs reaction followed by elimina-
tion; see: Lawrence, N. J.; Ghani, F. A.; Hepworth, L. A.;
Hadfield, J. A.; McGown, A. T.; Pritchard, R. G.
Synthesis 1999, 1656.
In summary, the purpose of this study was to investigate
and develop methods for the preparation of original
enynes and enediynes as analogues of Combretastatin
A-4. We have presented here, the synthesis and the eval-
uation of new enynes 2 and 3 as well as enediynes 4. We
have developed an efficient route to the preparation of
eleven new compounds via palladium cross-coupling
reactions. Enyne 2b and enediyne 4e inhibited tubulin
polymerization with an IC50 60–70 lM while the other
compounds did not reveal any significant activity. At a
concentration of 10À5 M, these two compounds showed
a marginal activity towards KB, MCF7 and MCF7R
cells. In this series of enynes and enediynes-types ana-
logues, examination of the anticancer results revealed
that, in these analogues, the incorporation of one or
two triple bonds does not play a role for maximal anti-
cancer activity.
´
12. Ramiandrasoa, P.; Brehon, B.; Thivet, A.; Alami, M.;
Cahiez, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2447.
13. Simoni, D.; Giannini, G.; Baraldi, P. G.; Romagnoli, R.;
Rondanin, R.; Baruchello, R.; Grisolia, G.; Rossi, M.;
Mirizzi, D.; Invidiata, F. P.; Grimaudo, S.; Tolomeo, M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3005.
14. Takahashi, S.; Kuroyama, Y.; Sonogashira, K.; Hagihara,
N. Synthesis 1980, 627.