C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
olefins (aziridination) with RN3 using 2 as a catalyst precursor. Such
group-transfer reactions are by nature restricted to being stoichio-
metric ones when a multistep synthetic protocol involving Ni(I) is
required to access the key L2NidNR complexes.4a,22 Two features
of this system, however, appear to obviate its development into a
functional catalytic process. First, the success of the conversion of
2 to 4 relies on having a sufficiently labile ligand, like η2-C6H6, in
the Ni(0) precursor complex. Common olefins (e.g., ethylene,
1-hexene, 1,5-cyclooctadiene) bind too strongly to the (dtbpe)Ni-
fragment and are not displaced by RN3 to give η2-N3R complexes.
Second, the reaction of RN3 with 4 to give RNdNR is faster at
reasonable N3R concentrations than is the aziridination of olefins
by 1.4a,20 It is noteworthy that these limiting factors can be
overcome in the related cyclopropanation of ethylene by N2CPh2,
where modest catalytic turnover is observed using (dtbpe)Nid
CPh2.4a
Figure 2. Perspective views of 4a (l) and 4b (r) with thermal ellipsoids
drawn at 35% probability and H-atoms omitted. Select bond lengths (Å)
and angles (deg) for 4a: Ni-N ) 1.673(2), N-C(31) ) 1.417(3), Ni-P(1)
) 2.1371(8), Ni-P(2) ) 2.1405(8), Ni-N-C(31) ) 163.0(2), P(1)-Ni-P(2)
) 91.69(3). For 4b: Ni-N(1) ) 1.703(4), N-C(31) ) 1.347(7), Ni-P(2)
) 2.179(1), Ni-N-C(31) ) 180, P(1)-Ni-P(2) ) 91.12(5).
pure dark red crystals of (dtbpe)NidNAd (4a) in 81% yield
(Scheme 1). The beneficial role of added 2 appears to be to keep
the equilibrium concentration of free AdN3 low (favoring 3a in
the equilibrium shown in Scheme 1). We have shown that AdN3
undergoes a side reaction with 4a to effect its decomposition
(forming azoadamantane, AdNdNAd).20 The terminal mesityl
imido complex (dtbpe)NidNMes (4b) can be similarly prepared,
but the best yields are obtained by treatment of concentrated
petroleum ether solutions of 2 with MesN3 to afford 4b in 84%
yield as analytically pure turquoise crystals. 1H and 31P NMR
spectra of complexes 4a and 4b are consistent with pseudo C2V-
symmetry and present features typical of a terminal imido complex
of nickel(II).1 Both imido complexes 4a and 4b were crystallo-
graphically characterized (Figure 2). These complexes and previ-
ously reported imido 1 highlight interesting structural features
associated with the nitrogen substituent. The metrical parameters
of 4b and 1 are nearly identical except that the NisNsC angle is
rigorously linear for 4b while it is slightly bent at 162.8(2)° in 1.
The alkylimido 4a has a NisNsC angle (163.0(2)°) similar to that
for 1 with a slightly shorter NisN bond (∆ ∼0.03 Å).1
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation through Grant CHE-0615274 (to G.L.H.) and
a predoctoral GAANN Fellowship from the Department of Educa-
tion (to R.W.).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures with
characterization data and kinetic data (PDF) as well as crystallographic
information for 3a, 3b, 4a, and 4b (CIF). This material is available
References
(1) Mindiola, D. J.; Hillhouse, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4623.
(2) Mindiola, D. J.; Hillhouse, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9976.
(3) Melenkivitz, R.; Mindiola, D. J.; Hillhouse, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 3846.
(4) (a) Waterman, R.; Hillhouse, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 13350.
(b) Mindiola, D. J.; Hillhouse, G. L. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1840. (c)
Waterman, R.; Hillhouse, G. L. Organometallics 2003, 22, 5182.
(5) Bach, I.; Porschke, K.-R.; Goddard, R.; Kopiske, C.; Kruger, C.; Rufinska,
A.; Seevogel, K. Organometallics 1996, 15, 4959.
(6) (a) Nugent, W. A.; Mayer, J. M. Metal-Ligand Multiple Bonds; John Wiley
& Sons: New York, 1988. (b) Wigley, D. E. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1994, 42,
239. (c) Cenini, S.; Gallo, E.; Caselli, A.; Ragaini, F.; Fantauzzi, S.;
Piangiolino, C. Coord. Chem. ReV. 2006, 250, 1234.
(7) (a) Kogut, E.; Wiencko, H. L.; Zhang, L.; Cordeau, D. E.; Warren, T. H.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 11248. (b) Related Co systems. Dai, X.;
Kapoor, P.; Warren, T. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4798.
(8) Jenkins, D. M.; Betley, T. A.; Peters, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
11238.
Kinetic studies of the conversion of 3a to 4a were undertaken
to provide insight into this process. Because of the lability of the
azide ligand in 3a in benzene solution (Vide supra), kinetic
measurements were carried out in the presence of ∼5 mol% of 2,
although the rate was shown to be independent of [2]. The
conversion of 3a to 4a as measured by 31P NMR (C6D6) shows
first-order dependence on [3a] with kobs ) 1.70(8) × 10-3 s-1 at
45 °C ([3a]0 ) 6.1 × 10-2 M). An Eyring analysis of the
temperature dependence of the rate over a 23-70 °C range yielded
activation parameters (∆H‡ ) 15.9(7) kcal/mol; ∆S ‡ ) -19.7(9)
eu) suggestive of a highly ordered transition state. A four-membered
cyclic transition state, involving RN3 coordination to Ni through
both the R- and γ-nitrogen atoms prior to N2 loss (Scheme 1), is
consistent with these data and is similar to one proposed by
Bergman in the thermal decomposition of Cp2TaMe(η1-N3-p-Tol)12
(rather than trapping of a triplet nitrene fragment).21
In summary, we have demonstrated that that alkyl- and aryl-
substituted nickel(II) imido complexes can be prepared directly from
organic azides and an appropriate Ni(0) precursor. This method
complements the previously reported route to Ni(II) imides that
relies on sequential preparation of a Ni(I) amide followed by its
chemical oxidation to a cationic Ni(II) amide that can be depro-
tonated to afford the Ni(II) imide. In principle this route offers the
possibility for carrying out catalytic “nitrene-transfer” reactions to
(9) Thyagarajan, S.; Shay, D. T.; Incarvito, C. D.; Rheingold, A. L.; Theopold,
K. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4440.
(10) Iluc, V. M.; Miller, A. J. M.; Hillhouse, G. L. Chem. Commun. 2005, 5091.
(11) Piro, N. A.; Figueroa, J. S.; McKellar, J. T.; Cummins, C. C. Science 2006,
313, 1276.
(12) (a) Proulx, G.; Bergman, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 6382. (b)
Proulx, G.; Bergman, R. G. Organometallics 1996, 15, 684.
(13) Fickes, M. G.; Davis, W. M.; Cummins, C. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
117, 6384.
(14) Guillemot, G.; Solari, E.; Floriani, C.; Rizzoli, C. Organometallics 2001,
20, 607.
(15) Hanna, T. A.; Baranger, A. M.; Bergman, R. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 653.
(16) Barz, M.; Herdtweck, E.; Thiel, W. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37,
2262.
(17) Dias, H. V. R.; Polach, S. A.; Goh, S.-K.; Archibong, D. F.; Marynick,
D. S. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 3894.
(18) Albertin, G.; Antoniutti, S.; Baldan, D.; Castro, J.; Garcia-Fontan, S. Inorg.
Chem. 2008, 47, 742.
(19) Munro, G. A. M.; Pauson, P. L. J. Organomet. Chem. 1978, 160, 177.
(20) (a) Harrold, N. D.; Waterman, R.; Cundari, T. R.; Hillhouse, G. L.,
manuscript in preparation. (b) Waterman, R. Ph.D. Thesis, University of
Chicago, June, 2004.
(21) Abu-Omar, M. M.; Shields, C. E.; Edwards, N. Y.; Eikey, R. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6203.
(22) Cundari, T. R.; Vaddadi, S. THEOCHEM 2006, 801, 47.
JA805530Z
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 38, 2008 12629