4-HYDROXYBIPHENYL SYNTHESIS FROM 4-ISOPROPYLBIPHENYL
529
traction with 2% aqueous solution of NaOH (60 cm3,
30.6 mmmol) (to separate fractions a centrifuge was
used). Then, the aqueous phase (at the bottom) was
neutralized by adding 5% aq. HCl (23 cm3) and the
precipitate of 3 was filtered off. 2.93 g (17.22 mmol,
yield = 84%) of chromatographic pure 3 was obtained,
m.p. 165–167◦C (lit. 166–167◦C [15]).
of 20% aqueous solution of NaOH (67.7 mmol NaOH)
was dropped into the stirred mixture for 0.5 h. The
precipitate of sodium salt of 2 was filtered off and was
washed with water (5 × 5 cm3) and hexane (5 × 5 cm3).
Next, the precipitate of sodium salt of 2 was stirred in
60 cm3 of water and neutralized with 5% aqueous HCl
solution (until pH 7). Afterward, 2 was filtered and
washed with water (3 × 5 cm3) to give 7.18 g of 2 (yield
66%), 94% pure (as determined by iodometry). The 2
was purified twice by precipitation of the sodium salt
and then neutralization. 2 was obtained with a purity
exceeding 97%, m.p. 83.5–85◦C. Elemental analysis:
calculated for C15H16O2, 78.92%C, 7.06%H; found,
78.93%C, 6.95%H; Oactive: calculated 7.01; found,
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
To determine the oxidizability of 1, the initial rates
of oxidation of 1 (rox) were measured in the presence
of azo-initiators, the initiating properties of which (ri)
were known. The amount of initiator was adjusted to
get similar initiation rate at different temperatures. By
using Eq. (1), the oxidizability of 1 was calculated.
The kinetic data concerning the oxidation of 1
within a temperature range of 60–110◦C are shown in
Table I. For comparison, the kinetic data of the oxida-
tion of cumene are quoted too. This table indicates that
the susceptibility to oxidation of 1 is about 20%–30%
lower that that of cumene.
1
6.80%. H NMR (CDCl3/TMS) δ = 7.26–7.65 (m,
9Harom, and 1HOOH), 1.67 (s, 6H, C(CH3)2OOH). 13
C
ꢀ
NMR 143.6, 140.7, 140.4 (C-ar 1 ,1,4), 128.8, 127.3,
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
127.1, 125.9 (C-ar 2 ,2,3 ,3,5 ,5,6 ,6), 127.3 (C-ar 4 ), 83.9
(C(CH3)2OOH), 26.1 (C(CH3)2OOH).
The hydroperoxide 2 was relatively unstable and
partially decomposed to 3 in the presence of traces of
impurities.
4-Hydroxybiphenyl (3) was obtained from the acid
decomposition of 2. 13.62 g of the oxidate containing
34.5% of 2 (20.58 mmol 2) with 2.5 cm3 of acetone
was dropped into a solution of 0.06 g of concentrated
H2SO4 (0.58 mmol H2SO4) in 12 cm3 of acetone at
56◦C for 5 min. The heat of the decomposition reaction
was removed by partial vaporization of the acetone.
Since oxidate was added, the whole 2 decomposed to
3 during 5 min (the reaction was controlled by TLC
analysis). Then the mixture was neutralized by adding
0.45 g of Na2CO3 (4.24 mmol). Next the precipitate of
Na2CO3–Na2SO4 was filtered and acetone was evap-
orated. The remaining solid was diluted in 13 cm3 of
t-BuPh. Product 3 was isolated from the mixture by ex-
Figure 1 illustrates the dependence of −ln(kp/kt1/2
)
on the reciprocal of temperature. Based on the pre-
sented data and employing Eq. (2), the overall energy
of activation (Ep– Et/2) could be calculated.
The overall energy of activation (Ez = Ep – Et/2)
of the free-radical chain process of the oxidation of
1 amounts to 25.8
0.8 kJ/mol, and in the case of
cumene amounts to 29.1 0.8 kJ/mol.
To check the progress of the process at higher
conversion of 1, it was tested in the bubble reactor.
As initiator 1,1ꢀ-azobis(cyanocyclohexane) was used.
The oxidation was run within the temperature range
of 80–120◦C. The concentration of 2 in the reaction
Table I Kinetic Data of the Oxidation of 1 with Molecular Oxygen, p = 1 atm
Concentration
k /k1/2 × 102e
p
t
of Initiator × 103
r × 107c
Concentration of
1 (mol/dm3)
r
× 105
k /k1/2 × 102
for Cumene
i
ox
p
t
T (◦C)
(mol/dm3)
(mol/dm3·s)c
(mol/dm3·s) λd
(dm3/(mol·s)1/2
)
(dm3/(mol·s)1/2
)
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
15.09a
3.89a
1.08a
5.80b
1.60b
0.40b
0.10b
1.72
1.76
1.76
1.76
1.81
1.57
1.29
4.91
4.87
4.83
4.79
4.76
4.72
4.68
0.69
1.07
1.12
1.43
1.81
2.04
2.55
39
60
63
81
99
0.34
0.48
0.55
0.71
0.94
1.17
1.47
0.42
0.57
0.77
0.98
1.36
1.72
2.08
130
198
a 2,2-Azo-bis-isobutyronitrile as initiator (kd = 1.6 × 1015e−30800/RT [16]).
b 1,1ꢀ-Azobis(cyanocyclohexane) as initiator (kd = 5.24 × 1016e−35400/RT [17]).
c ri is calculated from the following equation: ri = 2ekdCi, where e is efficiency of initiation (with 0.6 taken for oxidation in the presence of
azo-initiators); kd is the constant rate of the initiator decomposition; Ci is the initiator concentration [18].
d λ = rox/ri is the length of the kinetic chain.
e Data for cumene [19].
International Journal of Chemical Kinetics DOI 10.1002/kin