U. Hillaert et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 335–337
Table 1. Assignment of all fragment ions (positive ion mode) in the mass spectrum of 1
337
Ion (ppm)
Relative
abundance (%)
m/z
Measured
m/z
Calculated
Elemental
composition
Error
M+H–H2O
M+H–2H2O
1.9
7.0
100
31.3
22.5
2.0
355.1288
337.1180
253.1178
235.1068
190.0858
133.0985
121.0310
115.0897
355.1294
337.1189
253.1188
235.1083
190.0868
133.0977
121.0289
115.0872
C19H19N2O5
C19H17N2O4
C12H17N2O4
C12H15N2O3
C11H12NO2
C5H13N2O2
C7H5O2
À1.7
À2.9
À3.9
À6.4
À5.2
6.0
M+H–salicyloyl+H
M+H–salicyloyl–H2O+H
M+H–HCOOH–salicylamide
M+H–2 salicyloyl+2H
Salicyloyl
6.5
2.8
17
23
M+H–2 salicyloyl+2H
C5H11N2O
present in the mass spectrum can be assigned (Table 1).
The structure may arise from double conjugation of
salicylic acid to ornithine.
M. R.; Shah, P.; Upton, R. J.; Walls, S. B. J. Org. Chem. 1999,
14, 5166.
9. Obrecht, D.; Lehmann, C.; Ruffieux, R.; Schonholzer, P.;
Muller, K. Helv. Chim. Acta 1995, 78, 1567.
10. All new compounds were characterized by spectroscopic
means. 3: white solid; TLC Rf=0.37 (ethyl acetate/hex-
ane=50:50); H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 1.60 (2H, m,
Structure 1 was confirmed by comparison of relevant
spectroscopic data with those of the synthetic com-
pound. The synthesized ornithine conjugate will further
serve as a valuable tool (analytical standard) to investi-
gate the excretion of salicylic acid and its metabolites.
1
CH2–CH), 1.87 (2H, m, CH2–CH2–CH2), 3.29 (2H, dt, app
dd, J=6.45 and 12.61, NH-CH2), 3.67 (3H, s, COCH3), 3.84
(3H, s, OCH3), 3.90 (3H, s, OCH3), 4.53 (1H, ddd, J=5.28,
7.92 and 12.61, CH-NH), 6.96–7.18 (4H, m, arom.), 7.40–7.52
(2H, m, arom.), 7.67 (1H, dd, J=2.05 and 7.91, arom.), 7.76
(1H, dd, J=1.76 and 7.62), 8.16 (1H, t, J=5.57, NH-CH2),
8.47 (1H, d, J=7.33, CH–NH–CO); 13C NMR (75 MHz,
DMSO-d6) d 25.67, 28.73, 38.68, 52.10, 52.38, 55.88, 56.20,
112.05, 112.39, 120.52, 120.75, 122.30, 123.87, 130.26, 130.66,
131.98, 132.78, 156.93, 157.33, 164.94, 165.25, 172.56; Exact
mass (ESI-MS) for C22H27N2O6 [M+H]+: found 415.1861
calculated 415.1868. 1: white solid; TLC Rf=0.24 (ethyl ace-
tate/hexane/formic acid=80:20:1); 1H NMR (300 MHz,
DMSO-d6) d 1.63 (2H, m, CH2–CH), 1.88 (2H, m, CH2–CH2–
CH2), 3.34 (2H, dt, app dd, J=6.81 and 12.81, NH–CH2),
4.49 (1H, ddd, J=5.18, 8.45 and 12.54, CH-NH), 6.82-6.95
(4H, m, arom.), 7.33–7.44 (2H, m, arom.), 7.82 (1H, dd,
J=1.64 and 8.45, arom.), 7.95 (1H, dd, J=1.64 and 8.45,
arom.), 8.80 (1H, t, J=5.72, NH-CH2), 8.93 (1H, d, J=7.63,
References and Notes
1. Burke, A. B.; Millburn, P.; Huckle, K. R.; Hutson, D. H.
Drug Metab. Dispos. 1987, 15, 581.
2. Igarashi, K.; Suzuki, R.; Kasuya, F.; Fukui, M. Chem.
Pharm. Bull. 1992, 40, 2196.
3. Williams, R. T. Federation Proceedings 1967, 26, 1029.
4. Seymour, M. A.; Millburn, P.; Tait, G. H. Biochem. Soc.
Trans. 1988, 16, 1021.
5. Vree, T. B.; van Ewijk-Beneken Kolmer, E. W. J.; Verwey-
van Wissen, C. P. W. G. M.; Hekster, Y. A. J. Chromatogr. B
1994, 652, 161.
6. Baert, K.; De Backer, P. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijds-
chrift 2002, 71, 117.
7. Baert, K.; De Backer, P. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C 2002,
accepted for publication.
8. Macdonald, S. J. F.; Clarke, G. D. E.; Dowle, M. D.;
Harrison, L. A.; Hodgson, S. T.; Inglis, G. G. A.; Johnson,
CH–NH–CO), 12.14 (1H, br s, OH), 12.65 (1H, br s, OH); 13
C
NMR (75 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 25.83, 28.46, 38.69, 52.28,
115.25, 115.72, 117.43, 117.56, 118.62, 118.93, 127.69, 128.78,
133.81, 133.95, 159.50, 160.41, 168.48, 169.29, 173.34; Exact
mass (ESI-MS) for C19H21N2O6 [M+H]+: found 373.1407
calculated 373.1399.