10.1002/anie.202011036
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
COMMUNICATION
states of Ni(II) and Ni(I) leading to the (R)-isomer share very
similar square planar geometry with some distortion (Figure 2).
The bound alkene is accommodated in the quadrant defined by a
P-methyl group of DuPhos, while the Ni-phenyl group is tilted
towards the diagonal quadrant of the other P-methyl group. (d)
The barrier of subsequent hydrogen elimination is larger on the
Ni(II) pathway than Ni(I), in 11.2 and 4.1 kcalmol-1, respectively.
Thus, olefin isomerization along the nickel(I) pathway should be
much more facile than that of nickel(II). (e) Experimentally, alkene
insertion of 4-t-butylphenyl sulfonates gave adduct 4a in 99% ee
(see Scheme 2). In calculations, energy gap between
diastereomeric TSs for insertion of 4-t-butylphenyl nickel(II) and
nickel(I) also increases to 2.3 and 2.7 kcalmol-1, respectively. In
disfavored transition states of insertion of both pathways, a large
P-t-butyl group pushes 2,3-dihydrofuran away from itself so that
the alkene fragment is positioned well above the coordination
plane; the other P-t-butyl group forces the Ni-aryl group to tilt in
the quadrant of P-methyl group. No close contact between
quinoxP* and the distal t-butyl group on the inserting aryl ring is
identified, so we conclude excellent stereoselectivity of 4a is
electronic in origin.
Keywords: nickel catalysis • Heck reaction • reductive Heck
reaction • aryl sulfonates • aryl halides
[1] Reviews and examples: a) O. Loiseleur, M. Hayashi, N. Schmees, A. Pfaltz,
Synthesis 1997, 1338; b) O. Loiseleur, M. Hayashi, M. Keenan, N.
Schmees, A. Pfaltz, J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 16; c) A. B. Dounay,
L. E. Overman, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2945; d) M. Shibasaki, E. M. Vogl,
T. Ohshima, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1533; e) L. F. Tietze, H. Ila, H.
P. Bell, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 3453; f) D. Mc Cartney, P. J. Guiry, Chem.
Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5122; g) E. W. Werner, T.-S. Mei, A. J. Burckle, M. S.
Sigman, Science 2012, 338, 1455; h) Z. Yang, J. Zhou, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012, 134, 11833; i) J. Hu, H. Hirao, Y. Li, J. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2013, 52, 8676; Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 8838; j) C. Wu, J. Zhou, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 650; k) C. C. Oliveira, A. Pfaltz, C. R. D. Correia,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 127, 14036; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127,
14242; l) Z. Jiao, Q. Shi, J. S. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56,
14567; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 14759.
[2] a) A. Minatti, X. Zheng, S. L. Buchwald, J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 9253; b)
S. Liu, J. Zhou, Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 11758; c) C. Shen, R.-R. Liu,
R.-J. Fan, Y.-L. Li, T.-F. Xu, J.-R. Gao, Y.-X. Jia, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015,
137, 4936; d) W. Kong, Q. Wang, J. Zhu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56,
3987; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 4045; e) S. Mannathan, S.
Raoufmoghaddam, J. N. H. Reek, J. G. de Vries, A. J. Minnaard,
ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 551; f) Z.-M. Zhang, B. Xu, Y. Qian, L. Wu, Y. Wu,
L. Zhou, Y. Liu, J. Zhang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 10373; Angew.
Chem. 2018, 130, 10530; g) T. Ghosh, ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 4747; h)
L. J. Oxtoby, J. A. Gurak, Jr., S. R. Wisniewski, M. D. Eastgate, K. M. Engle,
Trends Chem. 2019, 1, 572; i) Z. Yuan, Z. Feng, Y. Zeng, X. Zhao, A. Lin,
H. Yao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 2884; Angew. Chem. 2020, 131,
2910; j) X. Huang, M. H. Nguyen, M. Pu, L. Zhang, Y. R. Chi, Y.-D. Wu, J.
S. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 10814; Angew. Chem. 2020,
132, 10906.
Overall, both nickel(I) and nickel(II) pathways seem to be
plausible based on the calculations. Experimentally, Ni(cod)2 and
QuninoxP* cleanly formed a precatalyst [Ni(cod)(QuinoxP*)],
o
which promoted Heck insertion of some aryl triflates at 100 C,
[3] Calculations and experiments on elementary steps catalyzed by nickel: a)
Lin, L. Liu, Y. Fu, S.-W. Luo, Q. Chen, Q.-X. Guo, Organometallics 2004,
23, 2114; b) V. H. Menezes da Silva, A. A. C. Braga, T. R. Cundari,
Organometallics 2016, 35, 3170; c) A. B. Dürr, G. Yin, I. Kalvet, F. Napoly,
F. Schoenebeck, Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1076; d) S. Bajo, G. Laidlaw, A. R.
Kennedy, S. Sproules, D. J. Nelson, Organometallics 2017, 36, 1662; e) X.
Li, X. Hong, J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 864, 68; f) K. D. Vogiatzis, M. V.
Polynski, J. K. Kirkland, J. Townsend, A. Hashemi, C. Liu, E. A. Pidko,
Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 2453.
without adding a reductant such as zinc dust (see Scheme 2b).
This led us to tentatively lean toward a classical nickel(0)/(II)
shuttle.
[4] A review on Pd-catalyzed Heck reaction of mesylates and tosylates: a) B.-
J. Li, D.-G. Yu, C.-L. Sun, Z.-J. Shi, Chem.-Eur. J. 2011, 17, 1728; reviews
on nickel-catalyzed Heck reaction: b) S. Z. Tasker, E. A. Standley, T. F.
Jamison, Nature 2014, 509, 299; c) A. L. Clevenger, R. M. Stolley, J.
Aderibigbe, J. Louie, Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 6124; d) S. Bhakta, T. Ghosh,
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, doi:10.1002/adsc.202000820; Examples of nickel-
catalyzed Heck reaction: e) G. P. Boldrini, D. Savoia, E. Tagliavini, C.
Trombini, A. U. Ronchi, J. Organomet. Chem. 1986, 301, C62; f) S. A.
Lebedev, V. S. Lopatina, E. S. Petrov, I. P. Beletskaya, J. Organomet.
Chem. 1988, 344, 253; g) S. Iyer, C. Ramesh, A. Ramani, Tetrahedron Lett.
1997, 38, 8533; h) T. M. Gøgsig, J. Kleimark, S. O. Nilsson Lill, S. Korsager,
A. T. Lindhardt, P.-O. Norrby, T. Skrydstrup, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 134,
443; i) R. Matsubara, A. C. Gutierrez, T. F. Jamison, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2011, 133, 19020; j) Z. Yang, J. Zhou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11833;
k) aryl pivalates: A. R. Ehle, Q. Zhou, M. P. Watson, Org. Lett. 2012, 14,
1202; l) R. Lhermet, M. Durandetti, J. Maddaluno, Beilstein J. Org. Chem.
2013, 9, 710; m) R. Shrestha, S. C. M. Dorn, D. J. Weix, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2013, 135, 751; n) benzylic ethers: M. R. Harris, M. O. Konev, E. R. Jarvo,
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 7825; o) aryl mesylates, tosylates and
sulfamates: S. Z. Tasker, A. C. Gutierrez, T. F. Jamison, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1858; Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 1889; p) J.-N.
Desrosiers, L. Hie, S. Biswas, O. V. Zatolochnaya, S. Rodriguez, H. Lee,
N. Grinberg, N. Haddad, N. K. Yee, N. K. Garg, C. H. Senanayake, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 11921; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 12100; q) K.
M. M. Huihui, R. Shrestha, D. J. Weix, Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 340; r) J. M.
Medina, J. Moreno, S. Racine, S. Du, N. K. Garg, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2017, 56, 6567; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 6667; s) B. R. Walker, C. S.
Sevov, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 7197.
Figure 2. Insertion transition states of a cationic phenylnickel(II)
complex of (R)-DuPhos (right) and a neutral phenylnickel(I) complex
(left), both leading to the major (R)-enantiomer.
In conclusion, we identified that nickel complexes ligated by
strongly donating diphosphines were effective for intermolecular
asymmetric Heck reaction of aryl triflates, mesylates and
tosylates. The nickel complexes also promoted asymmetric
reductive Heck arylation of a ketal of 2-cyclopentenone.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge financial supports from Peking University
Shenzhen Graduate School, Shenzhen Bay Laboratory Institute
of Chemical Biology, Nanyang Technological University, GSK-
EDB Trust Fund (2017 GSK-EDB Green and Sustainable
Manufacturing Award) and A*STAR Science and Engineering
Research Council (A1783c0010).
[5] J.-N. Desrosiers, J. Wen, S. Tcyrulnikov, S. Biswas, B. Qu, L. Hie, D.
Kurouski, L. Wu, N. Grinberg, N. Haddad, C. A. Busacca, N. K. Yee, J. J.
Song, N. K. Garg, X. Zhang, M. C. Kozlowski, C. H. Senanayake, Org. Lett.
2017, 19, 3338.
[6] Examples: a) X. Qin, M. W. Y. Lee, J. S. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2017, 56, 12723; Angew. Chem. 2017, 129, 12897; b) X. Qin, M. W. Yao
Lee, J. S. Zhou, Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 5990.
[7] F. Yang, Y. Jin, C. Wang, Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 6989.
[8] Examples: a) K. Wang, Z. Ding, Z. Zhou, W. Kong, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018,
140, 12364; b) D. Anthony, Q. Lin, J. Baudet, T. Diao, Angew. Chem., Int.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.