Redox Economic Synthesis of the Hapalindole Family
A R T I C L E S
A, which contains a spirocyclic cyclobutane centered around
C(3). The remaining welwitindolinones are comprised of a
[4.3.1]bicyclononanone core, which contains an assortment of
oxidative functionalization.
inability of chemists to attain the chemo-, regio-, and stereo-
control characterizing most enzymatic processes. The careful
practitioner can make use of many abiotic tools in solving these
problems; however, these methods usually demand significant
departure from the ideal biomimetic route. In light of these
difficulties, it is certainly possible, and perhaps prudent, to find
an appropriate balance when designing a retrosynthesis. An ideal
synthesis might entail the use of powerful synthetic methods,
coupled with a flexible adherence to the general synthetic
blueprint provided by Nature.
With a family of such diverse and unique molecular archi-
tectures, it should come as no surprise that several syntheses
have been reported for these natural products, specifically
focusing on the simpler members of the family. Syntheses have
been reported for hapalindoles G,7 H,8 J,9 M,9 Q,10 O,11 and
U,8 in addition to approaches to various other hapalindoles.12
There are no reported efforts toward the hapalindolinones,
hapaloxindoles and fontonamides, and only one approach toward
an ambiguine.13 The first total synthesis of an ambiguine
(ambiguine H) was reported from our laboratory.14 Despite the
many approaches toward the welwitindolinones,15 at the time
of our initial communication16 of the work presented herein,
the members of the welwitindolinone family had not yet
succumbed to synthesis; however, the Wood group reported a
very elegant synthesis of welwitindolinone A shortly thereafter.17
Given these considerations, and with such a large and diverse
family of complex natural products, a biosynthetic proposal that
comprehensively describes the interrelationships between the
members would undoubtedly be enlightening to any synthetic
undertaking. The Moore group, in conjunction with their elegant
isolation studies, put forth many plausible biosynthetic rumina-
tions that are summarized in Scheme 1. Moore’s biosynthesis
begins with the tryptophan derivative (1a) and terpene (1b),
which are enzymatically joined Via chloronium-promoted poly-
olefin cyclization to provide the tricyclic hapalindole core (i.e.,
12-epi-hapalindole E (2), Scheme 1). At this point, Moore and
co-workers proposed that the tricycle can proceed through
multiple divergent pathways, the first of which (path A)
commences with a cyclization between C(4) of indole and the
isopropylidene unit at C(15), leading to the tetracyclic hapal-
indoles (i.e., 12-epi-hapalindole G (3)). These natural products
can then undergo further oxidation at the indole moiety, leading
to the oxindole (i.e., anhydrohapaloxindole A (4)), which can
be oxidatively cleaved to give the formylkynurenine (i.e.,
hapalonamide V (5)). Alternatively, the tetracyclic hapalindoles
can have a tert-prenyl moiety attached to C(2) (i.e., ambiguine
A (6)), which can be engaged in an intramolecular cyclization,
leading to the pentacyclic ambiguines (i.e., ambiguine E (7)).
These alkaloids can then be further oxidized (i.e., ambiguine D
(8)) or rearranged (i.e., ambiguine G (9)). Furthermore (path
B), the tricyclic hapalindoles can undergo cyclization between
C(2) and the isopropylidene at C(15), providing the fischerin-
doles (i.e., 12-epi-fischerindole G (10)). Finally, Moore and co-
workers proposed that the tricyclic hapalindoles can be oxidized
to give the putative intermediate 11, which has not been isolated
as a natural product (path C). They further proposed that this
intermediate undergoes an acid-catalyzed cyclization to afford
welwitindolinone A (12), presumably in the pocket of an
enzyme. If 12 could be further oxidized, leading to the
intermediate epoxide 13, the [4.3.1]bicyclononane system could
be formed after rearrangement (i.e., “welwitindolinone B
isonitrile” (14a), which is likely to be a natural product that
has yet to be isolated). Moore and co-workers suggested that
methylation and oxidation of 14a could lead to N-methylwel-
witindolinone C (15) and further demonstrated the conversion
of 15 into 3-hydroxy-N-methylwelwitindolinone C (17) and
N-methylwelwitindolinone D (19).
Biosynthetic Relationships and Retrosynthetic
Analysis
Biomimetic syntheses are often more efficient due to the
tactics that Nature employs, namely rapid assembly of skeletal
complexity, a linear increase of oxidation state, use of mild and
simple reagents, and the ability to control chemoselectivity (lack
of protecting groups).18 Despite their inherent advantages,
biomimetic syntheses can be exceedingly difficult, due to the
(7) Fukuyama, T.; Chen, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3125–3126.
(8) Muratake, H.; Kumagami, H.; Natsume, M. Tetrahedron 1990, 46,
6351–6360.
(9) (a) Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 1815–
1818. (b) Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 6331–
6342. (c) Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Tetrahedron 1990, 46, 6343–
6350.
(10) (a) Baran, P. S.; Richter, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7450–
7451. (b) Vaillancourt, V.; Albizati, K. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993,
115, 3499–3502. (c) Kinsman, A. C.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
3189–3191. (d) Kinsman, A. C.; Kerr, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 14120–14125.
(11) Sakagami, M.; Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1994,
42, 1393–1398.
(12) (a) Kinsman, A. C.; Kerr, M. A. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 3517–3520. (b)
Brown, M. A.; Kerr, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 983–985. (c)
Banwell, M. G.; Ma, X.; Taylor, R. M.; Willis, A. C. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 4959–4961.
(13) Chandra, A.; Viswanathan, R.; Johnston, J. N. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5027–
5029.
(14) Baran, P. S.; Maimone, T. J.; Richter, J. M. Nature 2007, 446, 404–
408.
(15) (a) Wood, J. L.; Holubec, A. A.; Stoltz, B. M.; Weiss, M. M.; Dixon,
J. A.; Doan, B. D.; Shamji, M. F.; Chen, J. M.; Heffron, T. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6326–6327. (b) Deng, H.; Konopelski, J. P.
Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3001–3004. (c) Jung, M. E.; Slowinski, F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6835–6838. (d) Lo´pez-Alvarado, P.;
´
Garc´ıa-Granda, S.; Alvarez-Ru´a, C.; Avendan˜o, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 1702–1707. (e) Avendan˜o, C.; Mene´ndez, J. C. Curr. Org. Synth.
2004, 1, 65–82. (f) Ready, J. M.; Reisman, S. E.; Hirata, M.; Weiss,
M. M.; Tamaki, K.; Ovaska, T. V.; Wood, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2004, 43, 1270–1272. (g) MacKay, J. A.; Bishop, R. L.; Rawal,
V. H. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3421–3424. (h) Baudoux, J.; Blake, A. J.;
Simpkins, N. S. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4087–4089. (i) Greshock, T. J.;
Funk, R. L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2643–2645. (j) Lauchli, R.; Shea, K. J.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5287–5289.
While the Moore biosynthetic hypothesis provides an ad-
equate explanation of the possible relationships between many
of the distinct structural classes, a few points remained uncertain,
primarily relating to the formation of the welwitindolinones.
First, the proposal that 12 arises from the unsaturated intermedi-
ate 11 Via an acid-catalyzed cyclization seems unlikely. The
fact that 63 members of this natural product family have been
(16) Baran, P. S.; Richter, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15394–
15396.
(17) (a) Reisman, S. E.; Ready, J. M.; Hasuoka, A.; Smith, C. J.; Wood,
J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 1448–1449. (b) Reisman, S. E.;
Ready, J. M.; Weiss, M. M.; Hasuoka, A.; Hirata, M.; Tamaki, K.;
Ovaska, T. V.; Smith, C. J.; Wood, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 2087–2100.
(18) See the following texts, and references therein: (a) Nicolaou, K. C.;
Sorensen, E. J. Classics in Total Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
1996. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Snyder, S. A. Classics in Total Synthesis
II; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2003.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 130, NO. 52, 2008 17941