Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
the VAPOL derivative L16,39 improved the outcome to 72%
ee. The yield, dr, and ee were all boosted using the
diethylamino analogue L17; further changes to the amine
substituents, however, did not lead to any significant
improvements (for details, see the SI). Varying the solvent
had little effect, whereas lowering the temperature to 0 °C or
−20 °C resulted in 81% and 84% ee, respectively; the decrease
in conversion could be compensated by using an excess of the
diene and a higher catalyst loading of 10 mol % (entry 11).
Under these conditions, 18a was obtained in 77% yield, 20:1
dr, and 84% ee.47 To the best of our knowledge, this represents
the first use of a VAPOL-phosphoramidite in nickel
catalysis.48−50
Scheme 5. Scope of the Enantioselective Reaction
These conditions were then used to survey the scope of the
enantioselective reaction. Hydrocinnamaldehyde, which had
been chosen for the initial screening, actually turned out to be
one of the more recalcitrant substrates, as evident from the
results for compounds 13, 18a, and 18b. Changing the O-
protecting group on the dienyl ether hardly altered the attained
ee’s (compare 18a/18b, 18c/18d, and 19a/19b). In contrast,
further lowering of the temperature to −40 °C had a notable
effect for aryl aldehydes, though at the expense of a drop in
yield (see 18e and 19f). Various aryl aldehydes with different
steric and electronic properties were tested. Excellent ee’s were
obtained for substrates bearing electron-donating, neutral, and
weakly electron-withdrawing substituents. Even the presence of
an ortho-methyl group is well tolerated (18g). The
compatibility of the nickel-based catalyst system with an aryl
chloride is also noteworthy (18j), as is the ability to run the
reaction in the presence of an arylboronate group (18l), which
opens numerous possibilities for downstream functionalization.
The poorer result caused by the strongly electron-withdrawing
4-CF3 group (18k, 78% ee) reveals a limitation of the current
catalyst system, which could not be ameliorated even by
running the reaction at −60 °C (30% yield, 82% ee). In
contrast, electron-rich furfural fared very well, furnishing
product 18m in excellent yield and selectivity.
Another interesting observation pertains to the syn-diol
series. Whereas the results for aliphatic aldehydes were rather
uniform, we were surprised to find that 4-phenylbenzyldehyde
reacted less selectively with (Z)-configured dienes than with
(E)-dienes (cf. 18e versus 19e, 74% versus 87/93% ee).
Fortunately, recourse to a benzyl protecting group improved
the outcome to a respectable 92% ee at −40 °C (19f); this
result mandates further systematic survey. Finally, it is
emphasized that the diastereoselectivity was invariably
excellent in the anti as well as syn series; in many cases, the
attained dr’s approach the limits of detection (NMR).
In conclusion, we have discovered a synthesis of
monoprotected vicinal diols based on a nickel-catalyzed
reductive coupling of dienol ethers and aldehydes that exhibits
an unusual regioselective course and can selectively access
either diastereomer of the product. The use of bulky, relatively
electron-deficient phosphorus ligands including cyclodiphos-
phazane L6 and VAPOL phosphoramidite L17 proved key to
unlocking this transformation. The presence of a silyl or benzyl
group on one oxygen of the diol products should allow for
selective functionalization; therefore, the new method nicely
complements the traditional catalytic asymmetric toolbox
which usually affords two unprotected vicinal hydroxy groups.
Importantly, both anti and syn diol products can be obtained in
invariably outstanding diastereoselectivity and often excellent
enantioselectivity with a range of alkyl and aryl aldehydes.
Work is underway to gain more mechanistic insights and
increase the level of induction as well as the scope of the
reaction even further.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at
■
sı
Experimental procedures and supporting characteriza-
tion data and spectra (PDF)
D
J. Am. Chem. Soc. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX