has not been defined.6,4a,b We report herein the successful
copper(I)-facilitated Suzuki coupling of 2-heterocyclic bo-
ronates that is broad in scope; furthermore, mechanistic
investigations suggest a possible role of copper in the
catalytic cycle.
Table 1. Scope of the Electrophilea
Initial survey reactions of 2-pyridyl boronates with Pd-
(dppf)Cl2 gave much higher conversions with CuI additive
relative to the noncopper conditions. Encouraged by these
results, we sought to optimize the reaction conditions using
parallel microscale high-throughput experimentation tech-
niques.7 We rapidly evaluated various parameters including
copper source, ligand, base, and solvent. It was found that
the reactivity of copper salt followed the order CuCl > CuBr,
Cu2O > CuI and that the amount of bipyridyl formation was
minimized with CuCl or Cu2O. Dppf was found to be the
optimal ligand, with DMF and Cs2CO3 as preferred solvent
and base. In addition, we used microscale design of experi-
ments (DOE)8 to determine the optimal temperature (100
°C) and equivalencies of reagents (2:1 of boronate to aryl
halide) and also discovered that the most robust reactions
were acheived when dppf was used as a 2:1 ratio to
palladium.
With these results in hand, we surveyed the scope of the
electrophile using boronate ester 1 (Table 1).9 Reaction of
aryl iodides proceeded in high yield with CuCl (89%, entry
1) relative to the standard Suzuki conditions without CuCl
(22%). This yield enhancement is even more pronounced
when moving to the less reactive bromide and triflate
electrophiles (entries 2 and 3), where almost no conversion
is observed without the use of CuCl, and high yields (88%
and 76%, respectively) are maintained with CuCl. Ortho
substitution is tolerated (entry 4), as are heteroaryl halides
(entries 5 and 6), but the yield is lower for the electron-rich
4-methoxyphenyl bromide in entry 7.
Next, various 2-heterocyclic boronates were examined
(Table 2). Unsubstituted and substituted 2-pyridyl substrates
bearing electron-withdrawing substituents performed well
under these reaction conditions (entries 1-5) with yields
ranging from 70 to 97%. Once again, control reactions
without CuCl gave negligible conversions. Notably, the
highly electron-deficient cyano boronate (entry 6) affords a
63% yield.4c While moderate conversions are observed for
2-pyrazinyl and 2-pyrrolo boronates (entries 7 and 8) without
CuCl, higher yields are achieved with CuCl. Interestingly,
a Reaction conditions: 1.0 equiv of halide, 2.0-2.5 equiv of 2-pyridyl
boronate, 2.0 equiv of Cs2CO3, 5 mol % of Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol % of dppf,
100 mol % of CuCl, 0.1 M DMF, 100 °C, 16 h. b Yields are based on
purification after silica gel chromatography. Conversions are based on
LC/MS. c Isolated yield.
6-substituted 2-pyridyl boronates gave high isolated yields
both with and without CuCl (entries 9 and 10), regardless
of the electronic properties of the 6-substituents.10
We hypothesize that the reaction primarily operates
through the basic Suzuki catalytic cycle (Figure 1). Direct
transmetalation from electron-deficient heterocyclic boronates
to palladium (path A) is relatively slow in comparison with
deboronation (path B). Alternatively, transmetalation to form
a 2-pyridyl copper species (path C) and a second transmeta-
lation to a palladium complex (path D) may provide a more
efficient process, allowing conversion to cross-coupled
product after reductive elimination. The major competing
reaction is the reductive homocoupling of the 2-pyridyl
copper species resulting in 2,2′-pyridine dimer, thus neces-
sitating the use of excess boronate for complete conver-
sions.11
We sought to provide mechanistic support for the proposed
initial transmetalation from boron to copper (path C) by
treating pyridyl boronate 7 with 1 equivt of CuCl at 80 °C
(Scheme 1). After 90 min, homocoupled dimer 8 was
obtained as the major product, characteristic of an intermedi-
ary 2-pyridylcopper species.12a No conversion to 8 was
observed in the control reaction without CuCl, providing
indirect evidence for path C.
(5) (a) Farina, V.; Kapadia, S.; Krishman, B.; Wang, C.; Liebeskind,
L. S. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 5905–5911. (b) Han, X.; Stoltz, B. M.; Corey,
E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 7600–7605. (c) Mee, S. P. H.; Lee, V.;
Baldwin, J. E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1132–1136
.
(6) (a) Savarin, C.; Liebeskind, L. S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2149–2152.
(b) Li, J.-H.; Li, J.-L.; Wang, D.-P.; Pi, S.-F.; Xie, Y.-X.; Zhang, Y.-X.;
Zhang, M.-B.; Hu, X.-C. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2053–2057. (c) Thathagar,
M. B.; Beckers, J.; Rothenberg, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11858–
11859
.
(7) Details of similar high-throughput experiments are found in: Dreher,
S. D.; Dormer, P. G.; Sandrock, D. L.; Molander, G. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 9257–9259.
(10) A similar phenomenon with C-H insertions was reported: Lewis,
J. C.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 5332–
5333.
(8) For a recent example of DOE applied to a Pd-catalyzed reaction,
see: Denmark, S. E.; Butler, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3690–
3704.
(11) This homocoupling is also associated with loss of Cu(I) from the
catalytic cycle. Use of Cu2O minimizes homocoupling and enables a catalytic
copper reaction, as 87% yield is achieved in entry 1, Table 1 with 10 mol
% Cu2O. Conversions are substrate dependent, and efforts to develop more
robust catalytic copper conditions are ongoing.
(9) Though several substrates gave complete conversion within 1 h,
reactions were continued to 16 h as a general protocol. Alternatively,
reactions could be conducted using mircowave irradiation at 160 °C and
were typically complete in 20 min.
346
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 2, 2009