COMMUNICATION
bond cleavage at the backbone methyl group of 1 by 1,3-
di-tert-butylimidazol-2-ylidene is shown by the formation
of 2 and the elimination of HCl under isolation of 1,3-di-
tert-butylimidazolium chloride. The previously reported
germylene 2 was formed by the reaction of 1 with LiN-
(SiMe3)2. Similar deprotonation reactions at the backbone
have been observed for the borane-stabilized germylene
hydride,2 the tautomerization of a iminogermane bearing the
ꢀ-diketiminato ligand,13 a cyclodiazaborane analogue,14 and
related calcium complexes.15 This is so far a unique example
where the deprotonation reaction at the backbone has been
demonstrated using 1,3-di-tert-butylimidazol-2-ylidene.
Activation of the ammonia molecule has attracted con-
siderable interest over the years. Although ammonia usually
forms simple Lewis acid-base adducts with transition-metal
complexes, there is also some N-H activation of ammonia
via transition-metal complexes known.16,17 In contrast to
these studies, the corresponding chemistry of stable main-
group molecular compounds for activation of ammonia is
virtually nonexistent. In 2007, the first example of ammonia
splitting was reported by Bertrand and co-workers using
Figure 1. Anisotropic displacement parameters, depicted at the 50%
probability level of 3. Hydrogen atoms, except those vital at the nitrogen
atom N3, are omitted for clarity. Selected bond lengths [Å] and angles [deg]:
Ge1-N3 1.845(2), Ge1-N1 2.030(2), Ge1-N2 2.030(2); N1-Ge1-N2
88.60(8), N3-Ge1-N1 95.52(10), N3-Ge1-N2 95.55(10).
Scheme 2. Preparation of 3
stable carbenes.18 Very recently, Power and co-workers
reported the activation of ammonia by the heavier group 14
element carbene analogue SnAr2 [Ar ) C6H3-2,6(C6H3-2,6-
iPr2)2],19 and Stephan and co-workers reported the activation
of amine by a frustrated Lewis pair.20
(10) All manipulations were carried out under anaerobic and anhydrous
conditions with Schlenk techniques. (a) L′Ge (2): 1,3-di-tert-butyl-
imidazol-2-ylidene (0.360 g, 2.0 mmol) and LGeCl (1.050 g, 2.0 mmol)
were dissolved in toluene (30 mL) at room temperature. The reaction
mixture was stirred, and the color of the solution changed from yellow
to brown-red. A white precipitate was formed. The reaction mixture
was stirred for another 1 h, then the white precipitate was separated
by filtration, and the remaining red solution was evaporated. The
residue was dissolved in n-hexane. Storage of the solution at -30 °C
for 1 day yielded brown-red crystals suitable for a single-crystal X-ray
diffraction experiment. Yield: 0.630 g (65%). 1H NMR (500 MHz,
C6D6): δ ) 7.04-7.21 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 5.43 (s, 1H, γ-CH), 3.91 (s,
1H, CH2), 3.69 (sept, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 3.44 (sept, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 3.26
(s, 1H, CH2), 1.41 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.35 (d, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.29 (d, 6H,
CH(CH3)2), 1.20 (d, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.15 (d, 6H, CH(CH3)2) ppm.
(b) LGeNH2 (3): Dry ammonia gas was added to a red solution of 2
(0.490 g, 1 mmol) in toluene (20 mL) at room temperature. The
reaction mixture became orange. For a further 5 min, the ammonia
gas was bubbled through the solution. After that, the solvent was
removed in vacuum and the residue was extracted with n-hexane. The
solution was reduced to half of the volume. Storage of the solution at
-30 °C for 1 day yielded yellow crystals suitable for a single-crystal
Herein we show the N-H cleavage of ammonia by
employing L′Ge [2; L′
) CH{(CdCH2)(CMe)(2,6-
iPr2C6H3N)}2], which generates at mild conditions a terminal
GeNH2 group (Scheme 2).10 The addition of an excess of
b
dry ammonia gas to a red solution of 2 in toluene leads to a
rapid change of the color to orange. The solution was
evaporated and extracted with n-hexane. Concentration of
the solution yielded yellow crystals of LGeNH2 (3). X-ray
crystal structure analysis afforded a monomeric structure,
as illustrated in Figure 1.21 Surprisingly, 3 is monomeric in
1
X-ray diffraction experiment. Yield: 0.455 g (95%). Mp: 162 °C. H
(18) Frey, G. D.; Lavallo, V.; Donnadieu, B.; Schoeller, W. W.; Bertrand,
G. Science 2007, 316, 439–441.
NMR (500 MHz, C6D6): δ ) 7.12-7.18 (m, 6H, Ar-H), 4.79 (s, 1H,
γ-CH), 3.54 (sept, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 3.47 (sept, 2H, CH(CH3)2), 1.60
(s, 6H, CH3), 1.35 (d, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.28 (d, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.24
(d, 6H, CH(CH3)2), 1.14 (d, 6H, CH(CH3)2) ppm. 13C{1H} NMR
(125.77 MHz, C6D6): δ ) 163.20 (CN), 145.95, 143.77, 142.74,
125.81, 124.66, 124.18 (Ar-C), 95.55 (γ-C), 29.19 (CH(CH3)2), 28.60
(CH(CH3)2), 28.25 (CH(CH3)2), 26.96 (CH(CH3)2), 24.76 (CH(CH3)2),
24.67 (CH(CH3)2), 23.40 (CH3) ppm. IR (Nujol, KBr): ν ) 3431 vw,
3333 vw (N-H) cm -1. EI-MS (70 eV): m/z (%): 507 (100) [M+].
Anal. Calcd for C29H43GeN3 (507.27): C, 68.79; H, 8.56; N, 8.30.
Found: C, 69.25; H, 8.82; N, 7.66.
(19) Peng, Y.; Ellis, B. D.; Wang, X.; Power, P. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 12268–12269.
(20) Chase, P. A.; Stephan, D. W. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 7543-7547;
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7433-7437.
(21) Single-crystal structure analysis of 3: The data set was collected on a
Bruker TXS-Mo rotating anode equipped with INCOATEC Helios
mirror optics (Mo KR, λ ) 71.073 pm). The crystal was mounted in
a shock-cooled oil drop at the tip of a fibre.22 The integration was
performed with SAINT V7.46A, which was followed by an empirical
absorption correction with SADABS-2008/1. The structure was solved
by direct methods and refined with SHELXL against F2.23 The positions
of the hydrogen atoms H3A and H3B at the amine nitrogen atom N3
were taken from the difference map and refined with distance restraints.
C29H43GeN3, M ) 506.25 g/mol, crystal size 0.25 × 0.03 × 0.03 mm,
monoclinic, C2/c, a ) 2490.2(5) pm, b ) 1516.7(3) pm, c ) 1467.2(3)
pm, ꢀ ) 95.261(3)°, V ) 5.5180(18) nm; Z ) 8, Fcalcd ) 1.219 Mg/
m3, µ ) 1.131 mm-1, T ) 100(2) K, 2θmax ) 50.76°, 25 829 reflections
measured, of which 5069 were independent, Rint ) 0.0526, R1 )
0.0385 [I > 2σ(I)], wR2 ) 0.1048 (all data), +0.609/-0.799 e/Å3
residual densities. Complete crystallographic data are deposited at the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, where it can be downloaded
705305.
(11) Driess, M.; Yao, S.; Brym, M.; van Wu¨llen, C. Angew. Chem. 2006,
118, 4455-4458; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4349-4352.
(12) Arduengo, A. J.; Calabrese, J. C.; Davidson, F.; Dias, H. V. R.;
Goerlich, J. R.; Krafczyk, R.; Marshall, W. J.; Tamm, M.; Schmutzler,
R. HelV. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 2348–2364.
(13) Ding, Y.; Ma, Q.; Roesky, H. W.; Herbst-Irmer, R.; Noltemeyer, M.;
Schmidt, H.-G. Organometallics 2002, 21, 5216–5220.
(14) Qian, B.; Baek, S. W.; Smith, M. R. Polyhedron 1999, 18, 2405–
2414.
(15) Harder S. Angew. Chem. 2003, 115, 3553-3556; Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 3430-3434.
(16) Casalnuovo, A. L.; Calabrese, J. C.; Milstein, D. Inorg. Chem. 1987,
26, 971–973.
(17) Zhao, J.; Goldman, A. S.; Hartwig, J. F. Science 2005, 307, 1080–
1082.
(22) (a) Stalke, D. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1998, 27, 171–178. (b) Kottke, T.;
Stalke, D. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1993, 26, 615–619.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 48, No. 3, 2009 799