Organic Letters
Letter
a
is carried out in the presence of Ti(OiPr)4 as an additive.
Under these conditions, diverse β-substituted ketones 10 were
obtained from cyclopropanols 8 and aryl or vinyl bromides 9.
Transformation of cyclopropanol 1 (Eox = +1.66 V)23 to
oxycyclopropyl radical 2 requires a relatively strong oxidant.
For comparison, the reduction potential of the excited
photocatalysts commonly used in the cooperative photoredox
and nickel-catalyzed reactions lies between +0.77 and +1.35
V.2a Thus, either a photocatalyst with stronger oxidative
properties or an alternative way of oxycyclopropyl radical 2
generation was required to initiate the cross-coupling.
Recently, we found that cyclopropanols undergo one-electron
oxidation by the photoexcited acridimium salts [E1/2(P*/P−) =
+2.08 V],24 but our attempts to use them in the ring-opening
arylation of 8 with 9 were unsuccessful. Nevertheless, we found
that addition of Ti(OiPr)4 to the reaction mixture enables the
reaction even when 4CzIPN [E1/2(P*/P−) = +1.35 V]25 is
employed as a photocatalyst. The highest yield in the arylation
of 11a with p-bromoanisole (12a) was achieved when the
reaction was performed in acetone in the presence of the
photocatalyst, the nickel chloride bipyridine complex,
potassium carbonate as a base, and titanium isopropoxide as
an additive. Changing the solvent to acetonitrile and DMA led
to a slight decrease in yield, but in THF, the arylation was
significantly less efficient. When di-tert-butylbipyridine, bato-
phenanthroline, neocuproine, or dimethoxybipyridine was used
as an alternative ligand, the yield of 13a decreased compared to
that under the standard conditions. While inorganic salt K3PO4
can be employed as a base of choice, the reaction in the
presence of 2,6-lutidine afforded the product in a low 23%
yield. The yield of 13a in the reaction promoted by the
Ti(OtBu)4 additive with bulk tert-butoxide ligands was slightly
lower than in the presence of Ti(OiPr)4. Trimethyl borate also
promoted the cross-coupling, though significantly less
efficiently. No reaction was observed when aluminum
isopropoxide was used as an additive or when the arylation
was carried out in the absence of Ti(OiPr)4 or a photocatalyst
(Table 1).
Having optimized the reaction conditions, we next
investigated the scope of the reaction (Scheme 2). Aryl
bromides with donor or acceptor functional groups as well as
an ortho substituent reacted with 11a giving desired β-
arylketones 13a−f in 46−58% yields. Silylated hydroxyl group,
alkenyl, and diethylacetal units in the cyclopropanol substrate
were tolerated, but formation of 13h and 13i was slightly less
efficient. The reaction of the 1,2-disubstituted cyclopropanol
afforded arylketone 13j as a single β-branched regioisomer. In
contrast to the palladium-catalyzed arylation that leads to α-
branched products,26 the investigated radical reaction
proceeded with the cleavage of a more substituted bond of
the three-carbon ring. Next, cross-coupling of cyclopropanols
with vinyl halides was investigated. Generally, yields of the
alkenylation were better when the reaction was carried out in
the presence of neocuproine instead of a bipyridine ligand. The
reaction between cyclopropanol 11a and 2-bromoalkenes
provided ketones 14a and 14b in 84% and 55% yields,
respectively. Alkenylation of 11a with vinyl triflate also
proceeded efficiently to produce β-cyclohexenylketone 14c.
During the synthesis of γ,δ-unsaturated ketones 14d and 14e
from 2-alkyl-substituted vinyl bromides and cyclopropanol
11a, the bipyridine ligand was more favorable than neo-
cuproine and the products were isolated in 45% and 46%
yields, respectively. Formation of Z-alkenylketone 14e was
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditions
yield of 13a
b
entry
reaction conditions
standard conditions
(%)
1
60
28
49
51
47
47
21
30
56
23
47
19
0
2
THF instead of acetone
3
MeCN instead of acetone
4
DMA instead of acetone
5
6
7
8
NiCl2·DME and dtbbpy instead of NiCl2·bpy
BPhen·NiCl2·2DMF instead of NiCl2·bpy
NiCl2·DME and neocuproine instead of NiCl2·bpy
NiCl2·DME and dMeObpy instead of NiCl2·bpy
K3PO4 instead of K2CO3
9
10
11
12
13
2,6-lutidine instead of K2CO3
Ti(OtBu)4 instead of Ti(OiPr)4
B(OMe)3 instead of Ti(OiPr)4
Al(OiPr)3 instead of Ti(OiPr)4 or no Ti(OiPr)4 or
no 4CzIPN
a
Reaction conditions: 11a (0.1 mmol), 12a (0.2 mmol), photo-
catalyst (0.005 mmol), NiCl2·bpy (0.005 mmol) or NiCl2·DME
(0.005 mmol), ligand (0.005 mmol), additive (0.2 mmol), base (0.3
mmol), solvent (1 mL), blue LEDs (2 × 20 W), 15 h. Abbreviations:
4CzIPN, 2,4,5,6-tetra(9H-carbazol-9-yl)isophthalonitrile; bpy, 2,2′-
bipyridine; dtbbpy, 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine; BPhen, 4,4′-
diphenyl-2,2′-bipyridine; DME, 1,2-dimethoxyethane; DMA, N,N-
dimethylacetamide; dMeObpy, 4,4′-dimethoxy-2,2′-bipyridine.
b
1
Crude H NMR yield with CH2Br2 as the internal standard.
accompanied by a slight isomerization of the double bond,
which caused a decrease in the Z:E ratio to 8:1. A decrease in
the isomeric purity was more significant in the course of the
reaction affording products 14g and 14h, which bear the
alkene unit conjugated with an electron-rich aromatic ring.
After completion of the coupling, 14g was isolated as a 6:1 E/Z
mixture. This ratio further decreased to 1.7:1 when the
reaction time was increased to 48 h. Ketone product 14f with
the unsubstituted benzene ring was obtained as a single E
isomer. Aryl chloride units were inert under the reaction
conditions, and ketone 14h was prepared from the
corresponding vinyl bromide in a good 61% yield. Then,
diverse 1-mono- and 1,2-disubstituted cyclopropanols were
tested in the reaction with 2-bromopropene. The substrate
bearing two hydroxycyclopropyl groups underwent smooth
coupling giving diketone 14i in 51% yield. Silylated and
unprotected hydroxyl groups, the alkenyl unit, and acetal
protecting groups were tolerated, and corresponding products
14j−n were isolated in 41−75% yields. The reaction
conditions were mild enough for the preparation of chiral
alkenylketones 14o and 14p that contain sensitive α-stereo-
centers. Alkenylation of 1,2-disubstituted cyclopropanols
provided regioisomerically pure β-branched products 14q−s
in 41−64% yields. These reactions proceeded more efficiently
in the presence of the bipyridine ligand. Finally, β-
isopropenylcycloheptanone 14t was obtained from the bicyclic
cyclopropanol containing an aryl substituent at C1 in 57%
yield.
To gain insight into the role of Ti(OiPr)4 in the ring-
opening cross-coupling, additional control experiments were
carried out (Scheme 3A). First, we investigated the reaction
between cyclopropane 11a and Ti(OiPr)4 in acetone-d6. A fast
exchange between the isopropoxide and cyclopropyloxy ligands
5453
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 5452−5456