basis of our previous studies on the cyclization of 2,3-allenoic
acids in the presence of 2,3-allenols,7 we have developed
the cyclization of one 2,3-allenol in the presence of another8
or the same9 2,3-allenol, affording 4-(1′,3′-dien-2′-yl)-2,5-
dihydrofuran via an oxypalladation-carbopalladation-ꢀ-
hydroxide elimination mechanism. In this paper, we report
an efficient and controlled double cyclization approach to
the synthesis of 2,5-dihydrofuran-fused bicyclic skeletons
from the readily available bis(2,3-allenol)s or 2,3-allenol-
allenyl acetates, in which even the eight-membered rings
were formed easily (Scheme 1).
Table 1. Effects of Solvent and Catalyst on the Pd(II)-Catalyzed
Tandem-Cyclization Reaction of Bis(2,3-allenol) (1a)
Pd(II)
(5 mol %)
yield of recovery
time (h) 2aa (%) of 1a (%)
entry solvent
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CH2Cl2
CH3NO2 PdI2
PdI2
1.5
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
2
1
1
1
1
23
0
18
32
36
0
45
45
66
57
70
68
61
0
59
81
0
0
0
29
0
0
0
0
Scheme 1
CH3CN
AcOEt
THF
DMPU
DMSO
DMA
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
PdI2
PdI2
PdI2
PdI2
PdI2
PdI2
PdI2
PdBr2
PdCl2
9
10
11
12b
13
14
15
1
4
1
1
0
0
0
89
Our efforts in this area started with the reaction of
N-tethered bisallenol 1a under the catalysis of 5 mol % PdI2
in CH2Cl2, affording the fused bicyclo[5.3.0]product 2a in
23% yield with 59% of 1a being recovered (Table 1, entry
1). The reaction in other solvents, such as CH3NO2, CH3CN,
CH3CO2C2H5, THF, DMPU, DMSO, or DMA, also yielded
2a (Table 1, entries 2-8), different from what was observed
in the intermolecular reaction.9 There is a solvent effect here:
the reaction in DMA is low-yielding (Table 1, entry 8), and
the best result was obtained when the reaction was conducted
in DMF (Table 1, entry 9). Among different Pd(II) catalysts,
PdCl2 is the best (Table 1, entries 9-15). The reaction of
1a may also proceed at rt to give 2a in the same yield with
a longer reaction time (Table 1, entry 12).
PdCl2
PdCl2(PhCN)2
Pd(OAc)2
PdCl2(PPh3)2
DMF
DMF
1
0
97
a Determined by 1H NMR analysis using 1,3,5-trimethylbenzene as the
internal standard. b The reaction was conducted at 25 °C.
2e, 2f, and 2g smoothly in 57%, 67%, and 65% yields,
respectively, under conditions B (Table 2, entries 6-8).
The reaction may also be catalyzed by applying 5 mol %
PdI2 at 25 °C (Table 2, entry 9). The sulfone tether may
also be used (Table 2, entry 10). In addition, by applying
this protocol, even the bicyclo[6.3.0]products 2i and 2j
can be formed in 68% and 75% yields, respectively,
although the formation of the eight-membered ring is
always not easy (Table 2, entries 11 and 12).10-12 It is
important to note that the CdC bond in the products is in
the E-form, which was established by the NOESY analysis
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, further
investigation for the scope of the reaction of symmetric
substrates was conducted with the different R substitutents
and tether “X” (Table 2). The bisallenols 1a and 1b with
NTs as the tether provided the bicyclo[5.3.0]products 2a
and 2b in 62% and 78% yields, respectively (Table 2,
entries 1 and 2) under the catalysis of 5 mol % PdCl2 at
25 °C (conditions A). However, no expected product was
formed under conditions A from bisallenol 1c with a
carbon tether (Table 2, entry 3). Fortunately, when 0.5
equiv of NaI was applied as the additive, the reaction
afforded 2c in 58% yield; however, again the reaction
should be carried out in DMF instead of DMA9 to ensure
a good yield (entry 4 in Table 2, defined as conditions
B). The R-aryl-substituted bisallenol 1d can afford the
product 2d in 51% yield under conditions B (Table 2, entry
5). The bisallenols 1e, lf, and 1g with the ether functional
groupasthetethermayalsoprovidethefusedbicyclo[5.3.0]products
1
of 2e. H NMR spectra of the crude product indicated the
formation of only one stereoisomer, which is very different
from what was observed in the intermolecular reaction.9
Unfortunately, when an “unsymmetric” 1,6-bisallenol 1k
was used, as expected the reaction afforded a mixture of
(10) Illuminati, G.; Mandolini, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 95
.
(11) For reviews on the synthesis of cyclooctanoids, see: (a) Sieburth,
S. M.; Cunard, N. T. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 6251. (b) Mehta, G.; Singh,
V. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 881. (c) Yet, L. Chem. ReV. 2000, 100, 2963
.
(12) (a) Gilbertson, S. R.; DeBoef, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
8784. (b) Evans, P. A.; Robinson, J. E.; Baum, E. W.; Fazal, A. N. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 8782. (c) Wender, P. A.; Ihle, N. C.; Correia, C. R. D.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5904. (d) Wender, P. A.; Correa, A. G.;
Sato, Y.; Sun, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7815. (e) Wender, P. A.;
Gamber, G. G.; Hubbard, R. D.; Zhang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
2876. (f) Miller, S. J.; Kim, S.-H.; Chen, Z.-R.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1995, 117, 2108. (g) Snapper, M. L.; Tallarico, J. A.; Randall, M. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1478. (h) Ma, S.; Gu, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
(6) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Carmen Blanco, M.; Fischer, D.; Bats, J. W. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 1387.
2006, 128, 4942
(13) Mukaiyama, T.; Harada, T. Chem. Lett. 1981, 621
(14) (a) Xu, D.; Li, Z.; Ma, S. Chem. Eur. J. 2002, 8, 5012. (b) Xu, D.;
Li, Z.; Ma, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 3657
.
(7) Ma, S.; Gu, Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6182.
(8) Deng, Y.; Li, J.; Ma, S. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4263.
(9) Deng, Y.; Yu, Y.; Ma, S. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 585.
.
.
1206
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 6, 2009