Organic Process Research & Development 2009, 13, 706–709
Development of an Acid-Washable Tag for the Separation of Enantiomers from
Bioresolutions
Maude Brossat, Thomas S. Moody,* Florian de Nanteuil, Stephen J. C. Taylor, and Fatima Vaughan
Biocatalysis Group, Almac Sciences, Almac House, 20 Seagoe Industrial Estate, CraigaVon BT63 5QD, Northern Ireland
Scheme 1. Selective acylation of a secondary alcohol using
a lipase enzyme
Abstract:
A separation tool involving the use of a vinyl ester amino acid as
acyl donor in a bioresolution has been developed. The acid-
washable acyl group acts as a removable tag, facilitating separation
of the secondary alcohol from the bioresolution product mixture.
The use of these acyl donors from cheap, commercially available
amino acids has been demonstrated in conjunction with the
hydrolase enzyme Candida antarctica lipase B in the selective
acylation of a variety of secondary alcohols.
(basic workup).4 The resulting hemisuccinate product can be
separated from the unreacted alcohol by an aqueous base
workup. A summary of purification techniques used for the
separation of enantiomers from a bioresolution is shown in
Figure 1.
To our knowledge there are no reported acid-washable acyl
donors used in the separation of enantiomers from a bioreso-
lution in the literature. The present work describes an easy and
efficient method for the separation of products from a bioreso-
lution of secondary alcohols using vinyl ester amino acids as
acyl donors which lead to esters that are aqueous acid soluble.
This methodology can be applied to the industrial preparation
of valuable chiral secondary alcohols where the other techniques
fail in the separation workup.
It has been reported that proteases catalyse transesterifications
of alcohols with some N-protected vinyl ester amino acids.5
We decided to investigate this biotransformation using N-Boc-
protected vinyl ester amino acids for the bioresolution of
secondary alcohols using the amino moiety as an acid-washable
tag as shown in Scheme 2.
Introduction
Despite the dramatic improvements in enantioselective
synthesis and chromatographic separation methods, bioresolu-
tion still remains one of the most inexpensive and operationally
simple methods for producing pure enantiomers on a large scale
in the chemical industry.1 Typically the reactions are carried
out under ambient and neutral conditions. For example, hydro-
lase-catalysed kinetic resolutions have been widely used for the
synthesis of enantiopure secondary alcohols as shown in Scheme
1. These are important intermediates for the preparation of active
pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs).2
Following identification of the biocatalyst used in the
selective bioresolution, the separation of the modified enanti-
omers becomes the processing problem. The kinetic bioreso-
lution of racemic secondary alcohols is usually carried out by
a selective transesterification using acyl donors such as the enol
esters, vinyl acetate or isopropenyl acetate. The use of these
vinyl esters as acyl donors has the drawback of the separation
of the ester (product) and the alcohol (substrate) by column
chromatography, which can be costly and troublesome espe-
cially at large scale. To avoid this problem, an extractive workup
using the difference in polarity between the two products, by
choosing a long-chain fatty acid (vinyl butyrate, vinyl decanoate)
as acyl donor, can be used (neutral workup).3 An alternative
strategy involves cyclic anhydrides, such as succinic anhydride
Results and Discussion
To develop a process involving the bioresolution of second-
ary alcohols followed by an acid wash separation of products,
the hydrolase enzyme Candida antarctica lipase B (CAL-B)
was chosen since it is well recognized and accepted as a useful
catalyst in the chemical industry.6
The vinyl ester amino acids were synthesised from the
corresponding N-Boc-amino acids by treatment with vinyl
acetate, according to the method of Lobell and Schneider,7 in
(4) (a) Goswami, A.; Howell, J. M.; Hua, E. Y.; Mirfakhrae, K. D.;
Soumeillant, M. C.; Swaminathan, S.; Qian, X.; Quiroz, F. A.; Vu,
T. C.; Wang, X.; Zheng, B.; Kronenthal, D. R.; Patel, R. N. Org.
Process. Res. DeV 2001, 5, 415–420. (b) Bouzemi, N.; Debbeche, H.;
Aribi-Zouiou, L.; Fiaud, J.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 627–630.
(5) (a) Lloyd, R. C.; Dickman, M.; Jones, J. B. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1998, 9, 551–561. (b) Davis, B. G.; Fairbanks, A. J. Method for
preparing ester linked peptide-carbohydrate conjugates. US 2004/
0208883, A1, 2004.
* Author for correspondence. E-mail: tom.moody@almacgroup.com.
(1) (a) Ou, L.; Xu, Y.; Ludwig, D.; Pan, J.; Xu, J. H. Org. Process. Res.
DeV. 2008, 12, 192–195. (b) Park, O.-J.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, T.-Y.; Chung,
W.-G.; Lee, S.-W. Org. Process. Res. DeV. 2006, 10, 588–591. (c)
Yazbeck, D.; Derrick, A.; Panesar, M.; Deese, A.; Gujral, A.; Tao, J.
Org. Process. Res. DeV. 2006, 10, 655–660.
(2) (a) Ghanem, A.; Aboul-Enien, H. Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004,
15, 3331–3351. (b) Gotor-Ferna´ndez, V.; Brieva, R.; Gotor, V. J. Mol.
Catal. B: Enzym. 2006, 40, 111–120.
(6) (a) Vaidyanathan, R.; Hesmondhalgh, L.; Hu, S. Org. Process. Res.
DeV. 2007, 11, 903–906. (b) Gotor, V. Org. Process. Res. DeV. 2002,
6, 420–426. (c) Reigada, J. B.; Tcacenco, C. M.; Andrade, L. H.; Kato,
M. J.; Porto, A. L. M.; Lago, J. H. G. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007,
18, 1054–1058.
(3) Halle, R.; ter; Bernet, Y.; Billard, S.; Bufferne, C.; Carlier, P.; Delatre,
C.; Flouzat, C.; Humblot, G.; Laigle, J. C.; Lombard, F.; Wilmouth, S.
Org. Process. Res. DeV 2004, 8, 283–286.
(7) Lobell, M.; Schneider, M. P. Synthesis 1994, 375–377.
706
•
Vol. 13, No. 4, 2009 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op900028d CCC: $40.75 2009 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 05/18/2009