Scheme 1. Synthesis of Quinolines through the Povarov
Reaction
Figure 1. Biologically active indeno[1,2-b]quinolines.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of Indeno[1,2-b]quinolines without the Use
of Oxidant
wide diversity. Recently, the Povarov reaction,5À7 an in-
verse electron-demand aza-DielsÀAlder (IED-DA) reac-
tion of N-aryl imines derived from aldehydes and anilines
with electron-rich olefins, became one of the most efficient
protocols for quinoline preparation (Scheme 1). Alkynes
could also be used as dienophiles in a Povarov reaction,
although it is much less common than that of alkenes.7 To
furnish the quinoline structure, further oxidation of the
initial formed tetrahydro/dihydroquinoline under aerobic
conditions or using an additional oxidant is often needed.
The imine substrate is also known to act as an oxidant by
accepting hydrogen in the presence of acid catalyst, and the
corresponding reduction product, the amine, would be a
byproduct.6n,o,7f,7g,7i The Povarov reaction usually re-
N-aryl amines; it is based on the intramolecular Povarov
reaction (Scheme 2).
During our studies of transition-metal-catalyzed trans-
formations of propargyl carboxylates,8 we occasionally
found that the reaction of o-propargylbenzaldehyde 1a
with 2 equiv of aniline in DCE at 80 °C for 23 h afforded,
unexpectedly, a ring-condensed product of indeno[1,2-b]-
quinoline 2a in 38% yield (Table 1, entry 1). The unique
structural features and potential bioactivity of indenoqui-
nolines prompted us to investigate this condensation reac-
tion under various conditions. The results are summarized
quires a Lewis acid or protic acid such as BF3 Et2O, SnCl4,
3
lanthanide triflates, Tf2NH, or p-trifluoroacetic acid to
activate the imine substrates, with the reactions under
catalyst-free conditions being quite rare. Nevertheless,
the development of more simple and practical methods
with wide diversity is highly desired. In this communica-
tion, we present a novel synthetic route to indeno[1,2-b]-
quinolines via reaction of o-propargylbenzaldehydes with
˚
in Table 1. To our delight, in the presence of 4 A molecular
sieves (Alfa, 3À5 mm beads, 30 grains, ca. 1.5 g for 0.3
mmol scale) as a water-removing agent, 86% of 2a was
obtained in DCE at 80 °C for 8 h (entry 2). Using 1.0 equiv
of aniline, the yield of 2a was reduced to 69% (entry 3).
Decreasing the amount of molecular sieves resulted in a
(6) For a Povarov reaction with alkenes as dienophiles, see: (a)
Laschat, S.; Lauterweine, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 2856. (b) Beifuss,
U.; Herde, A.; Ledderhose, S. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1213. (c) Znang,
D.; Kiselyov, A. S. Synlett 2001, 1173. (d) Sundararajan, G.; N.
Prabagaran, N.; Varghese, B. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1973. (e) Magomedov,
N. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2509. (f) Anniyappan, M.; Muralidharan, D.;
Perumal, P. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 3653. (g) Hermitage, S.;
Howard, J. A. K.; Jay, D.; Pritchard, R. G.; Probert, M. R.; Whiting, A.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2451. (h) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Chetia,
L.; Srinivasulu, G.; Kunwar, A. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1039. (i)
˚
slightly lower yield of 2a (83%, entry 5, ca. 1.0 g 4 A
molecular sieves was used). The solvent effect was also
examined. The reaction could proceed in toluene, where
79% of the desired product 2a was obtained (entry 6).
However, the use of EtOH gave only a complex reaction
mixture (entry 7). In order to understand the effect of
protecting groups, reactions were carried out with Bz (1b),
Ac (1c), and CO2Me (1d) protected substrates. The reac-
tion proceeded smoothly in these cases, with the yields of
2a ranging from 58% to 83% (entries 8À10).
ꢀ
Jimenez, O.; de la Rosa, G.; Lavilla, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
6521. (j) Savitha, G.; Perumal, P. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3589. (k)
Muhuhi, J.; Spaller, M. R. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5515. (l) Zhou, J.;
Magomedov, N. A. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3808. (m) Hirashita, T.;
Kawai, D.; Araki, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 5421. (n) Shindoh, N.;
Tokuyama, H.; Takasu, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 4749. (o)
Shindoh, N.; Tokuyama, H.; Takemoto, Y.; Takasu, K. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 7451. (p) Gaddam, V.; Nagarajan, R. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 1975.
(q) Desrat, S.; van de Weghe, P. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 6728. (r)
Dagousset, G.; Zhu, J.; Masson, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14804.
(7) For a Povarov reaction with alkynes as dienophiles, see: (a)
Leardini, R.; Nanni, D.; Tundo, A.; Zanardi, G.; Ruggieri, F. J. Org.
Chem. 1992, 57, 1842. (b) Bortoloffl, B.; Leardini, R.; Nanni, D.;
Zanardi, G. Tetrahedron 1993, 49, 10157. (c) Baudelle, R.; Melnyk, P.;
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we next
investigated the reaction scope of this methodology.
During this process, we found that when Piv-protected
substrates were employed, in some cases, it was difficult
to obtain the desired products with high purity. However,
the use of Bz-protected substrates could circumvent
the purification problem. Thus we also used Bz-protected
ꢀ
Deprez, B.; Tartar, A. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 4125. (d) Heather Twin, H.;
Batey, R. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4913. (e) Zhou, H.-B.; Liu, G.-S.; Yao,
Z. -J. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2003. (f) Zhao, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Liu, Q.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4985. (g) Gaddam, V.; Ramesh, S.; Nagarajan,
R. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 4218. (h) Suresh, R.; Muthusubramanian, S.;
Senthilkumaran, R.; Manickam, G. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 1468. (i)
Pericherla, K.; Kumar, A.; Jha, A. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 4078.
(8) (a) Chen, Y.; Chen, M.; Liu, Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
6493. (b) Chen, M.; Y. Chen, Y.; Liu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
12189. (c) Chen, M.; Liu, J.; Wang, L.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Y. Chem.
Commun. 2013, 49, 8650.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX