C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
observed (Figures S1 and S3), which is assigned to the amide ether
(AE) product formed from the reaction of the singlet carbene with
methanol.2 The time-resolved transient IR spectra produced with
270 nm laser pulses (300 fs) in CH3OD are shown in Figure 2.
calculations reported in Table S1, the yield of γ-lactam formed
from the RIES pathway is ∼30% (see the transient absorption
spectrum at 3050 ps in Figure 2), which is consistent with the
previously reported chemical analyses.6,7
Significantly, a new transient species with a band peaking at 1706
cm-1 was observed in CH3OD. Even though this band overlapped
one of the ꢀ-lactam doublet peaks, it had a decay time constant of
102 ( 12 ps (Figure S6b), and remarkably, its decay correlated
with the growth of the AE band at 1640 cm-1 (109 ( 10 ps, Figure
S7). The carrier of the transient band at 1706 cm-1 is assigned to
the singlet carbene on the basis of computational results (Figure
S3). Another assignment of the carrier of this band is the cation
formed by protonation of the singlet carbene, but this is not
consistent with theory (Table S1). The singlet carbene was readily
detected in CH3OD relative to chloroform because (1) quantum-
mechanical calculations predict that the vibrational band of the
singlet carbene in methanol is less obscured by other species
(Figures S1 and S2), (2) this band has a larger intensity in methanol
than in chloroform (Table S1), and (3) VC is faster in methanol
than in chloroform and obscures the carbene spectra to a lesser
extent.
The transition states for ꢀ-lactam and γ-lactam formation from
the singlet carbene were located with density functional theory
(DFT) methods (Figure S8, Tables S2 and S3). The energy barrier
for γ-lactam formation (4.4 kcal/mol) is predicted to be 1.8 kcal/
mol less than that for ꢀ-lactam (6.2 kcal/mol), consistent with the
selective formation of γ-lactam from singlet carbene. Transition
state theory predicts that the lifetime of the relaxed singlet carbene
is 271 ps at 298 K. This is consistent with the 190 ( 42 ps growth
time constant for γ-lactam in chloroform.
In summary, our experiments indicate that in chloroform, both
ꢀ- and γ-lactams are formed from the diazoamide precursor via
RIES, and γ-lactam is also formed by isomerization of relaxed
singlet carbene. In methanol-O-d both carbene decay and the rise
of amide ether product are observed directly. The predictions of
DFT calculations are consistent with these experimental observations.
Figure 2. Transient IR spectra produced upon 270 nm photolysis of DZA
in CH3OD. The dashed curves are FTIR spectra of authentic γ-lactam in
this solvent.
The ꢀ-lactam band centered at 1733 cm-1 was again formed
immediately after the laser pulse, and it had constant intensity
between 30 ps and 3 ns. The rising time constant of 5.8 ps at 1733
cm-1 (Figure S5a) indicates that VC was faster in methanol than
in chloroform. One of the vibrational bands of the γ-lactam severely
overlapped the AE band centered at 1640 cm-1. However, the
intensity of γ-lactam probed at 1665 cm-1 remained constant from
10 to 3050 ps (Figure S5b), in contrast to the slow growth observed
in chloroform (Figure S2b). Thus, our data indicate that there are
two pathways for the formation of γ-lactam: the fast formation in
both chloroform and CH3OD is from the excited state of diazoamide
via the RIES mechanism, and the slow growth observed only in
chloroform is from singlet carbene (Scheme 1). The latter mech-
anism is absent in CH3OD, indicating that alcohol efficiently traps
the carbene species.6,7,12,13
Acknowledgment. This work was performed at The OSU
Center for Chemical and Biophysical Dynamics. G.B. thanks MF
EOG and FNP for a “Homing” Grant in 2009.
Supporting Information Available: Descriptions of the spectro-
meters, Figures S1-S8, and Tables S1-S3. This material is available
Singlet carbonyl carbenes have orthogonal geometries, in contrast
to their planar precursors.11 The orthogonal conformation assists
γ-lactam formation because the empty carbene p orbital points
toward a γ-CH bond (Tables S2 and S3). We speculate that in
methanol, solvent molecules surround the nascent singlet carbene
as a result of hydrogen bonding. This provides a solvent shell that
insulates the carbene center from the reactive C-H bond. Thus,
cyclization is suppressed, and OH insertion to solvent is preferred.
Singlet carbene rotation from the nascent planar to the relaxed
orthogonal conformation has been observed in chloroform.14
Our data also indicate that ꢀ-lactam is entirely formed from the
excited state of the diazoamide precursor, consistent with studies
of Tomioka et al.6 Moreover, Tomioka demonstrated that methanol
does not completely suppress γ-lactam formation relative to
cyclohexane (67% of the γ-lactam is carbene-derived, and 33% is
formed by a RIES mechanism).6,7 If we assume that the extinction
coefficients of γ-lactam and AE are similar, as predicted by the
References
(1) Rando, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 6706.
(2) Rando, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 1629.
(3) Corey, E. J.; Felix, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 2518.
(4) Kaplan, F.; Meloy, G. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 950.
(5) Tomioka, H.; Kitagawa, H.; Izawa, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 3072.
(6) Tomioka, H.; Kondo, M.; Izawa, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1090.
(7) Burdzinski, G. T.; Wang, J.; Gustafson, T. L.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 130, 3746.
(8) Bonneau, R.; Liu, M. T. H.; Kim, K. C.; Goodman, J. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 3829.
(9) Hamm, P.; Ohline, S. M.; Zinth, W. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 519.
(10) Minato, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1963, 36, 1020.
(11) Scott, A. P.; Platz, M. S.; Radom, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6069.
(12) The fast component observed in CHCl3 is consistent with the observation
that singlet carbene is observed in CHCl3 and overlaps with γ-lactam.
(13) We posit that the diazo excited state abstracts a hydrogen atom from a
C-H bond to form a singlet biradical, which cyclizes to form the two
lactams. The putative biradicals were not observed.
(14) Zhang, Y.; Kubicki, J.; Wang, J.; Platz, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112,
11093.
JA904009X
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 28, 2009 9647