S. Lin et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 3238–3242
3241
synthesized as showed in Table 6. As expected, many of these com-
pounds show further improved activity, with value of IC50 in the
MK-2 enzyme assay as low as 15 nM (12f). In the THP-1 cellular as-
say, these compounds were all active and exhibited up to 10-fold
NH2
N
O
NH2
N
1) POCl3/DMF
85 oC
NC
LiAlH4
H2N
N
R2
N
2) HCl (2N), reflux
34-52%
THF, rt
44-77%
R2
improved potency (12d, IC50 = 0.78
lM) compared to compound
R1
R1
1a (IC50 = 7.9
l
M) in reducing LPS-stimulated TNF production
a
13
14
from THP-1 cells. As is clearly evident from literature,7–12 there
are few known potent MK-2 inhibitors shown to possess submi-
cromolar cellular potency. These thioureas, therefore, represent a
novel class of highly potent MK-2 inhibitors.
NH2
S
NH2
N
R3-NCS, or
R3-NH2, TCI
R3
H2N
N
N
H
N
H
Compounds 12b, 12d, and 12f were selected for further study in
vivo. In an acute mouse inflammation model (mouse LPS model),16
all three compounds were found to be highly active (10 mg/kg, iv),
N
N
R2
R2
DIEA, CH2Cl2, rt
15-99%
R1
R1
with 62%, 70%, and 75% inhibition of TNFa production, respectively
15
for 12b, 12d, and 12f, one and half hours after LPS challenge.17
In summary, we have discovered a novel series of MK-2 inhibi-
tors based on 1-(2-aminopyrazin-3-yl)methyl-2-thiourea. Exten-
sive SAR studies were carried out on both the left-hand phenyl
moiety and the right hand aminopyrazine moiety of initial HTS
lead compound 1a, which resulted in the identification of potent
inhibitors with IC50 values as low as 15 nM. These compounds sup-
1a, 3 - 12
Scheme 1. Synthesis of compounds 1a, 3–12. See Table 2 for R1 and R2.
NH2
N
O
NH2
N
Ph-NCO
press the expression of TNFa in THP-1 cells and in vivo in an acute
H2N
N
N
inflammation model in mice.18
H
H
N
DIEA, CH2Cl2, rt
98%
N
Cl
Cl
References and notes
15a
1b
1. Camussi, G.; Lupia, E. Drugs 1998, 55, 613.
2. (a) Richard-Miceli, C.; Dougados, M. Bio. Drugs 2001, 15, 251; (b) Braun, J.;
Sieper, J. Bio. Drugs 2003, 17, 187; (c) Olson, N. J.; Stein, C. M. N. Eng. J. Med.
2004, 350, 2167; (d) Mousa, S. A.; Goncharuk, O.; Miller, D. Exp. Opin. Biol. Ther.
2007, 7, 617.
3. (a) Chen, Z.; Gibson, T. B.; Robinson, F.; Slicvestro, L.; Pearson, G.; Xu, B.;
Wright, A.; Vanderbilt, C.; Cobb, M. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 2449; (b) Pargellis, C.;
Regan, J. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2003, 4, 566.
S
NCS
H2N
R
N
N
R
DIEA, CH2Cl2, rt
4-96%
H
H
16
2a-l
4. (a) Haddad, J. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2001, 2, 1070; (b) Lee, M. R.; Dominguez,
C. Curr. Med. Chem. 2005, 12, 2979; (c) Ding, C. Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2006, 7,
1020. and references cited therein.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of compound 1b and 2. See Figure 2 for R.
5. (a) Kotlyarov, A.; Neininger, A.; Schubert, C.; Eckert, R.; Birchmeier, C.; Volk, H.
Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1, 94; (b) Neininger, A.; Kontoyiannis, D.; Kotlyarov, A.;
Winzen, R.; Eckert, R.; Volk, H. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 3065.
6. Hegen, M.; Gaestel, M.; Nickerson-Nutter, C. L.; Lin, L.-L.; Telliez, J.-B. J.
Immunol. 2006, 177, 1913.
7. Anderson, D. R.; Hegde, S.; Reinhard, E.; Gomez, L.; Vernier, W. F.; Lee, L.; Liu, S.;
Sambandam, A.; Snider, P. A.; Masih, L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 1587.
8. Anderson, D. R.; Meyers, M. J.; Vernier, W. F.; Mahoney, M. W.; Kurumbail, R.
G.; Caspers, N.; Poda, G. I.; Schindler, J. F.; Reitz, D. B.; Mourey, R. J. J. Med. Chem.
2007, 50, 2647.
9. (a) Trujillo, J. I.; Meyers, M. J.; Anderson, D. R.; Hegde, S.; Mahoney, M. W.;
Vernier, W. F.; Buchler, I. P.; Wu, K. K.; Yang, S.; Hartmann, S. J.; Reitz, D. B.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4657; (b) Wu, J.-P.; Wang, J.; Abeywardane,
A.; Andersen, D.; Emmanuel, M.; Gautschi, E.; Goldberg, D. R.; Kashem, M. A.;
Lukas, S.; Mao, W.; Martin, L.; Morwick, T.; Moss, N.; Pargellis, C.; Patel, U. R.;
Patnaude, L.; Peet, G. W.; Skow, D.; Snow, R. J.; Ward, Y.; Werneburg, B.; White,
A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4664.
10. (a) Goldberg, D. R.; Choi, Y.; Cogan, D.; Corson, M.; DeLeon, R.; Gao, A.;
Gruenbaum, L.; Hao, M. H.; Joseph, D.; Kashem, M. A.; Miller, C.; Moss, N.;
Netherton, M. R.; Pargellis, C. P.; Pelletier, J.; Sellati, R.; Skow, D.; Torcellini, C.;
Tseng, Y.-C.; Wang, J.; Wasti, R.; Werneburg, B.; Wu, J. P.; Xiong, Z. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 938; (b) Xiong, Z.; Gao, D. A.; Cogan, D. A.; Goldberg, D. R.;
Hao, M.-H.; Moss, N.; Pack, E.; Pargellis, C.; Skow, D.; Trieselmann, T.;
Werneburg, B.; White, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 1994.
11. Schlapbach, A.; Feifel, R.; Hawtin, S.; Heng, R.; Koch, G.; Moebitz, H.; Revesz, L.;
Scheufler, C.; Velcicky, J.; Waelchli, R.; Huppertz, C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2008, 18, 6142.
To follow up with the 4-carbamate SAR of compound 5q, a series
of 4-amino derivatives was synthesized and evaluated for their
inhibitory activity against MK-2, utilizing both 5-Cl and 5-Me
right-hand side (Table 4). Alkyl and aryl carbamates were first ex-
plored, and all compounds prepared in this series exhibit improved
potency over compound 1a (9a–e and 10a–b, IC50 = 0.15–0.94
tert-Butyl (9e and 10a, IC50 = 0.19 and 0.21 M, respectively) and
iso-butyl carbamates (9d, IC50 = 0.15 M) were identified to be
lM).
l
l
the most potent moieties. Replacement of the carbamate moiety
with a urea moiety was found well-tolerated with only slight com-
promise in activity (9g and 9h, IC50 = 1.7 and 0.70 lM, respectively).
However, the free NH is found to be necessary to keep the high
potency for the carbamate series, as substituting it with a phenyl
group (9f) or a methyl group (10c), or replacing it with an oxygen
(10d) resulted in significant loss of potency. Replacing the carba-
mate with an amide moiety was also investigated. As observed ear-
lier with compound 5o (Table 3), the aliphatic amides do not have
much influence on activity (10e–h, Table 5). Aromatic amides, that
is, benzamide (10i, IC50 = 0.58
lM) and 2-furanyl amide (10j,
IC50 = 0.61 M), however, do improve the activity markedly com-
l
12. a Anderson, D. R.; Meyers, M. J.; Kurumbail, R. G.; Caspers, N.; Poda, G. I.; Long,
S. A.; Pierce, B. S.; Mahoney, M. W.; Mourey, R. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009,
G.; Caspers, N.; Poda, G. I.; Long, S. A.; Pierce, B. S.; Mahoney, M. W.; Mourey, R.
pared to compounds 4b and 1a.
As a further extension of the SAR on the 4-amino series, we also
synthesized several compounds where 3- and 4-substituents are
joined to form a ring (Table 5). Very intriguingly, none of these
compounds show good potency against MK-2 in the in vitro en-
zyme assay, except cyclic carbamate compound 11a. Compound
13. Protocol of the MK-2 enzyme assay: The assay is started by mixing 12.5
0.5 nM MK-2 with 12.5 of biotinylated HSP27 72-90 (biotin-LC
AYSRALSRQLSSGVSEIRH) and 1.0 M ATP/30
Ci/mL 33P-ATP with or without
L of compound titration in kinase assay buffer (KB), which includes 50 mM
lL of
lL
4
l
lM
-
l
11a exhibits an IC50 of 0.21
lM, which is over 70-fold better than
1 l
Hepes (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl, 1 mM DTT, and 1 mg/mL BSA. The reaction was
incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The reaction was quenched by
addition of 125 lL of quench solution (PBS, pH 7.5, 50 mM EDTA, and 0.1%
Triton-100) containing 800 pmol/mL SPA bead to the above reaction mixture.
The plate was spun at 2000 rpm for 5 min, and counted at top counter (Packard).
that of other closely related compounds.
Having identified potent moieties on both the left-hand side
and the right-hand side of compound 1a, we then incorporated
these moieties onto the same molecules. Selected compounds were