Stensrud et al.
JOCArticle
or glycine in order to investigate neuronal processes in cell-
signaling, kinetic, and mechanistic studies of the central
nervous system.4
Only a very weak fluorescence is observed with this chromo-
phore.14d
Since our discovery that the p-hydroxyphenacyl (pHP)
chromophore will serve as a photoremovable protecting
group,5 several biologically relevant substrates such as phos-
phates (ATP5 and GTP6), thiols (Protein Kinase A7 and
glutathione8), and carboxylates (GABA9 and Glu10), includ-
ing the C terminus of the oligopeptide (bradykinin11,12
)
and examples of functional group protection in synthesis2,
have been reported. This has prompted us to investigate the
mechanistic features and substituent effects on the reaction.
Interestingly, the reaction results in a significant and useful13
blue shift because of the rearrangement of the chromo-
phore to (p-hydroxyphenyl)acetic acid (6) as a primary
product (eq 1). The reaction mechanism has been studied
in detail, predominantly by Phillips and co-workers14 and
by us.15 We have shown that the reaction of p-hydro-
xyphenacyl diethyl phosphate proceeds via a very short-lived
triplet state T1 (3τ = 60 ps in wholly aqueous solution)
and that the substrate is released concomitantly with the
decay of T1. Questions remain regarding the nature and
significance of competing pathways and the effect of sub-
stitution of the chromophore on the release of substrates.
In particular, the quantum yields for substrate release
are often substantially less than unity, suggesting that che-
mically nonproductive pathways may contribute to the
normal photophysical decay of the excited chromophore.
In previous studies, it was demonstrated that the intro-
duction of electron-donating groups such as OCH3 (4 and 5)
shifts the π,π* absorption of the chromophore to longer
wavelengths (λmax>300 nm), whereas electron-withdrawing
meta substituents (CO2Me or CONH2) have little influence
on λmax.
1,9 None of these substituents significantly affected
the lifetime of the triplet state in contrast to their effects on
the quantum yields.1,16 Electron-withdrawing groups im-
prove the quantum yields for the photo-Favorskii rearrange-
ꢀ
ment, whereas electron donors are lower vis-a-vis the parent
pHP derivatives.
To combine the advantages of the red shift by m-methoxy
substitution and the improved quantum yields from elec-
tron-withdrawing groups, we introduced trifluoromethyl
and trifluoromethoxy groups and compared the photochem-
istry and biological efficacy with those of the methoxy and
the unsubstituted pHP GABA analogues. Among the factors
that are attendant with introducing a trifluoromethyl sub-
stituent are the significant increase in polarity due to the
pronounced electron-withdrawing inductive contribution
of F,17 the relatively modest increase in steric size, and the
potential improvement in biocompatibility.18 Although the
trifluoromethyl group has rarely been exploited as a sub-
stituent on phototriggers,19 we reasoned that it would
modify the reactivity without greatly disturbing the π system
of the chromophore. We report here the synthesis and photo-
chemistry of three trifluoromethyl modifications, CF3O-
pHP GABA (2), CF3-pHP GABA (3), and CF3-pHP Glu
(8), to test this hypothesis. We have also probed the differ-
ences between 2 and 3 upon GABA release at the GABAA
receptor using whole-cell patch clamp monitoring of neurons
in cortical slices and compared these derivatives with those of
our previous study employing unsubstituted pHP GABA (1)
and m-CH3O-pHP GABA (4).9
(4) (a) Hess, G. P. Reference 1, pp 205-231. (b) Callaway, E. M.; Yuste,
R. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 12, 587–592. (c) Pettit, D. L.; Augustine, G. J.
Ion Channel Localization 2001, 349–370.
(5) (a) Park, C.-H.; Givens, R. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2453–
2463. (b) Geibel, S.; Barth, A.; Amslinger, S.; Jung, A. H.; Burzik, C.; Clarke,
R. J.; Givens, R. S.; Fendler, K. Biophys. J. 2000, 79, 1346–1357.
€
(6) (a) Kotting, C.; Kallenbach, A.; Suveyzdis, Y.; Wittinghofer, A.;
Gerwert, K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105, 6260–6265. (b) Warscheid, B.;
€
Brucker, S.; Kallenbach, A.; Meyer, H. M.; Gerwert, K.; Kotting, C. Vib.
Spectrosc. 2008, 48, 28–36. (c) Du, X.; Frei, H.; Kim, S.-H. J. Biol. Chem.
2000, 275, 8492–8500.
(7) Zou, K.; Cheley, S.; Givens, R. S.; Bayley, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 8220–8229. Zou, K.; Miller, W. T.; Givens, R. S.; Bayley, H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3049–3051.
(8) Specht, A.; Loudwig, S.; Peng, L.; Goeldner, M. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 8947–8950.
(9) Conrad, P. G. II; Givens, R. S.; Weber, J. F. W.; Kandler, K. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 1545–1547.
(10) Givens, R. S.; Jung, A. H.; Park, C.-H.; Weber, J. F. W.; Bartlett, W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 8369–8370.
(11) Givens, R. S.; Weber, J. F. W.; Conrad, P. G.; Orosz, G.; Donahue,
S. L.; Thayer, S. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2687–2697.
(12) Sul, J.-Y.; Orosz, G.; Givens, R. S.; Haydon, P. G. Neuroglia Biol.
2004, 1, 3–11.
Results and Discussion
Synthetic Studies. The synthetic sequence for 3 shown
in Scheme 1 is the general route used for all three of the
new derivatives. Benzyl protection of commercially available
4-bromo-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenol (9) with BnBr/K2CO3/
CH3CN, followed by acetylation with a Stille protocol20
using Pd(PPh3)4/tributyl(1-ethoxyvinyl)stannane in toluene,
and hydrolysis of the resulting enol ether gave the fluorinated
(13) The blue shift of the chromophore of the product (p-hydroxyphenyl)-
acetic acid to below 300 nm avoids competitive absorption with pHP and
thus permits 100% conversion of pHP derivatives at incident wavelengths
>300 nm. The “photo-Favorskii rearrangement” was first reported by
Anderson and Reese: Anderson, J. C.; Reese, C. B. Tetrahedron Lett.
1962, 1–4.
(14) (a) Chen, X.; Ma, C.; Kwok, W. M.; Guan, X.; Du, V.; Phillips, D. L.
J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 12406–12413. (b) Chen, X.; Ma, C.; Kwok, W.
M.; Guan, X.; Du, V.; Phillips, D. L. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 11832–
11842. (c) Ma, C.; Kwok, W. M.; Chan, W. S.; Du, Y.; Kan, J. T. W.; Toy, P.
H.; Phillips, D. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2558–2570. (d) Ma, C.;
Kwok, W. M.; Chan, W. S.; Zou, P.; Kan, J. T. W.; Toy, P. H.; Phillips, D. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1463–1472. (e) Ma, C.; Zou, P.; Kwok, W. M.;
Chan, W. S.; Kan, J. T. W.; Toy, P. H.; Phillips, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
6641–6657. (f) Ma, C.; Kwok, W. M.; Chan, W. S.; Zou, P.; Phillips, D. L. J.
Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 9264–9276.
(16) (a) Givens, R. S.; Conrad, P. G., II; Yousef, A. L.; Lee, J.-I.
Photoremovable protecting groups. CRC Handbook of Organic Photochem-
istry and Photobiology, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2004; pp 69/1-69/
46. (b) Givens, R. S.; Weber, J. F. W.; Jung, A. H.; Park, C.-H. New photo-
protecting groups: desyl and p-hydroxyphenacyl phosphate and carboxylate
esters. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 291 (Caged Compounds), 1-29.
(17) Pauling, L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond; Cornell University
Press: Ithaca, NY, 1960.
(15) Givens, R. S.; Heger, D.; Hellrung, B.; Kamdzhilov, Y.; Mac, M.;
Conrad, P. G.; Cope, E.; Lee, J. I.; Mata-Segreda, J. F.; Schowen, R. L.;
Wirz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3307–3309.
(18) Ojima, I. ChemBiolChem 2004, 5, 628–635.
(19) Specht, A.; Goeldner, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2008–2012.
(20) Stille, J. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1986, 25, 508–524.
5220 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 74, No. 15, 2009