K. Smolinka, B. Göber
Metabolism in human
FULL PAPER
Table 2. Results in comparison
Metabolite
Biomimetic method
Metabolism in rat
In vitro method
2
ϩ
ϩ
ϩ
ϩ
ϩ[a]
ϩ
Ϫ
ϩ
ϩ
ϩ
ϩ
ϩ[b]
ϩ
ϩ
Ϫ
ϩ
Ϫ
ϩ
3
4
10
Ϫ
13
14
Ϫ
Ϫ
Ϫ
Ϫ
Ϫ
Ϫ
15
further
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12
detected,
detected,
not identified
not found[9]
not identified[8]
[a]
[b]
Ethyl and methyl ester of 2. Ϫ No result of enzyme activity.
MS, Autospect, Micromass, magic bullet as matrix. For CI MS,
MAT Finnigan 95 ST, isobutane as reactant gas. Ϫ HPLC: Hewlett
Packard 1090, using a LiChroCart column (125 ϫ 4 mm) with pre-
column LiChroCart (4 ϫ 4 mm) containing LiChroSpher RP se-
lect-B (5 µm), Merck, diode-array detector, monitoring at 230 nm,
flow 1 mL/min, linear gradient: 60Ϫ98% or 70Ϫ98% methanol in
disodium hydrogen phosphate solution 0.002 mol/L, 0Ϫ20 min. Ϫ
TLC: Analytical TLC; HPTLC plates, silica gel 60F254, 5 ϫ 7.5 cm,
Merck, saturation time 15 min, front 6 cm. Preparative TLC; PSC
plates, silica gel 60F254, 2 mm, 20 ϫ 20 cm, Merck. Eluents used;
ethyl ester of 2 are known. They are artifacts like ethyl ben-
zilate formed by isolating procedures using methanol or
ethanol.[8] The possible primary metabolite is 2. The forma-
tion of 2 shows conformity with our biomimetic investi-
gations.
Less than 1% of the applied dose of 1-HCl could be de-
tected in metabolism studies in human.[9] Besides un-
changed 1, compounds 3 and 10 were quantified. They are
generated in chemical model systems, too. Thus, all meta-
bolites formed by oxidations and known from metabolism dichloromethane/methanol (9:1), dichloromethane/cyclohexane/
methanol/25% ammonia solution (5:3.5:1.5:0.05), cyclohexane/di-
oxane/ethyl acetate/ethanol/25% ammonia solution (1.5:1.5:4:2:1),
toluen/dioxane/glacial acetic acid (7:2.7:0.3), and toluene/ethyl
acetate (8:2). Detection reagents; concentrated sulphuric acid, Dra-
gendorff reagent by AB-DDR 87, 3-methyl-2-benzothiazolinone
hydrazone (MBTH) reagent, after saturation of plates with am-
monia vapour, coupling with MBTH solution (2% in methanol)
and following oxidation with potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) solu-
tion (8% in water).
in rat or human were found in biomimetic studies, with the
exception of 13. A comparison of quantities of different
methods was not indicated. Elaboration of validated
quantification does not seem beneficial because of the wide
product spectrum in chemical model system, no published
quantities of metabolites in rat, and the recovery of less
than 1% of applied dose in metabolism studies in human.
Total 1 is oxidized to 10Ϫ20% in the biomimetic system as
estimated from isolated derivatives.
With the incubation of the 10,000 g supernatant fraction
as an in vitro method only 3 was identified corresponding
with metabolism in rat and human, whilst 2 is not a product
of enzymatic activity. The main in vivo metabolites 10 and
13 were not found, cleavage of the ether bond was not ob-
served. Most derivatives were obtained with the described
biomimetic method. Mainly, metabolic reactions are sup-
posed to occur on the ester side chain. Aromatic oxygen-
ations are not expected due to their minor role in biomi-
metic studies. The minor role of the ether bond cleveage is
noteworthy. The importance of this fact will be seen in
further metabolism studies. The new derivatives 5, 6 could
be useful as reference substances for additional screening in
future studies on the metabolism of 1 in human.
Materials: Commercial reagents were purchased from standard
chemical suppliers and were used without further purification.
1-HCl and metabolites 2Ϫ4, and 10 were gifts from Apogepha Arz-
neimittel GmbH, Dresden (Germany). The methyl esters 8 and 9
were prepared according to ref.[8] MnTPFPPCl and FeTPFPPCl
were prepared according to ref.[6]
FeTPFPS4PCl according to ref.[10]
,
MnTPFPS4PCl and
2-(N-Formyl-N-methylamino)ethyl O-(2-Ethylbutyl)benzilate (5): 1H
NMR: δ ϭ 0.7 (6 H, CH3), 1.27 (5 H, CHϪCH2), 2.5 and 2.6 [1
H and 1 H, (Z)- and (E)-NϪCH3], 3.0 (2 H, OϪCH2), 3.3 and 3.4
(2 H and 2 H, NϪCH2), 4.19 and 4.25 (2 H and 2 H, COϪ
OϪCH2), 7.2Ϫ7.4 (10 H, aromatic H), 7.6 and 7.8 (1 H and 1 H,
CHO). Ϫ 13C NMR: δ ϭ 11.54 and 11.56, 23.84 and 23.86, 30.0
and 35.6, 42.1, 43.6 and 48.5, 62.0 and 63.2, 86.5, 128.19, 128.29,
128.41, 128.80, 128.83, 141.2 and 141.5, 163.0 and 163.1, 172.1. Ϫ
EI MS; m/z (%): 297 (< 1), 267 (17), 183 (100), 165 (17), 105 (77),
86 (23), 77 (22), 72 (8). Ϫ FAB MS; m/z: 420 [Mϩ ϩ Na]. Ϫ ESI
MS; m/z: 398 [Mϩ ϩ H], 420 [Mϩ ϩ Na].
2-[2-(2-Ethylbutoxy)-2,2-diphenylacetoxy]acetic Acid (6): 1H NMR:
δ ϭ 0.8 (6 H, CH3), 1.2 (5 H, CHϪCH2), 3.1 (2 H, OϪCH2), 4.2
(2 H, COϪOϪCH2), 7.1Ϫ7.4 (10 H, aromatic H). Ϫ 13C NMR:
δ ϭ 11.0, 23.1, 41.2, 64.9, 65.2, 85.2, 127.42, 127.46, 128.4, 142.1,
168.9, 170.9. Ϫ EI MS; m/z (%): 267 (24), 183 (100), 165 (23), 105
(75), 77 (25). Ϫ FAB MS; m/z: 393 [Mϩ ϩ Na], 357 [Mϩ ϩ H Ϫ
H2O]. Ϫ CI MS; m/z: 357 [Mϩ ϩ H Ϫ H2O].
Now, the application of such biomimetic systems to the
evaluation of analytical procedures in order to isolate and
elucidate derivatives of new drug substances for metabolism
studies is in progress.
Experimental Section
Equipment: NMR: Bruker DPX 300 (300 MHz and 75 MHz, for
1H and 13C, respectively), CDCl3 as solvent, TMS as internal stand-
ard. Ϫ MS: Hewlett Packard 5995 A (EIMS), 70 eV. For ESI MS,
Triple-Quadrupol-MS TSQ 700, Finnigan MAT Bremen. For FAB
2-(Dimethylamino)ethyl O-(2-Ethylbutyl)-2-hydroxybenzilate (12):
EI MS; m/z (%): 299 (1), 283 (< 1), 199 (16), 181 (4), 121 (9), 105
682
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 679Ϫ683