Though efficient, the reaction required propargylic acetates
as substrates and, moreover, did not work well with substrates
without substitution at either end of the propargyl moiety.
We reasoned that a Mo complex such as MoO2(acac)2 could
replace the acetyl moiety in this chemistry, similar to Akai’s
case, allowing the formation of R-halo-R,ꢀ-unsaturated
carbonyl products directly from propargylic alcohols and
likely with an improved scope (Scheme 3).
Scheme 2. Akai’s Chemistry and Our Conceived Mechanism
Scheme 3. Preparation of R-Halo-R,ꢀ-unsaturated Carbonyl
Compounds from Propargylic Alcohol: Design
reaction, several features are noteworthy: mild reaction
conditions (mostly at room temperature), low catalyst load-
ings (1 mol % for both Au and Mo complexes), and a broad
substrate scope.
Although Meyer-Schuster reactions catalyzed only by
gold complexes6 have been reported, the propargylic alcohol
substrates invariably contained features capable of substan-
tially stabilizing carbon cations. The broad scope and the
ease of Akai’s chemistry calls for, in our opinion, a
mechanism similar to that of propargylic carboxylates, where
a gold-catalyzed 3,3-rearrangement1b,c occurs en route to
enone formation.3a The difference is, as in our conceived
mechanism (Scheme 2), that the oxomolybdenum moiety acts
as an equivalent of the carbonyl group. Due to the labile
nature of the RO-Mo bond, intermediate 1 was generated
in situ and the Mo complex was rendered catalytic.
We first studied the formation of R-iodo enones/enals using
MoO2(acac)2 and Ph3AuNTf2 as the catalyst combination
and anhydrous CH2Cl2 as solvent. To our delight, R-iodo
enone 3 was indeed formed from propargylic alcohol 2 at
room temperature in 3 h (Table 1, entry 1). The drawback
8
Table 1. Bimetallic Au/Mo Catalysis: Conditions Optimization
We were attracted to the synthetic advantage of this
revelation as propargylic carboxylates in a range of gold
catalysis could be replaced with their precursors (i.e.,
propargylic alcohols) and thus decided to look into applying
this approach to some of the chemistry previously developed
in our laboratory.
3
entrya
additive
yield (%)b Z/Ec 4 (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
54
72
69
6/1
36
12
28
<2
<2
9
We recently reported a preparative method of linear
R-iodo/bromo-R,ꢀ-unsaturated ketones based on gold ca-
talysis using propargylic acetate substrates.3b,d These func-
tionalized enones are versatile synthetic intermediates and
can be readily converted to a range of R-substituted enones
via transition metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.7
DMSO (5 mol %)
DMF (5 mol %)
HMPA (5 mol %)
Ph3PO (5 mol %)
Ph3PO (1 mol %)
Ph3PO (5 mol %), no gold
no gold
24/1
11/1
26/1
16/1
12:1
18/1
80
>98d
71
13e
3e
<1
Ph3PO (5 mol %), no Mo
no Mo
7e
<1
<1
(2) For selected reviews on gold catalysis, see: (a) Hashmi, A. S. K.;
Rudolph, M. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2008, 37, 1766–1775. (b) Arcadi, A. Chem.
ReV. 2008, 108, 3266–3325. (c) Li, Z.; Brouwer, C.; He, C. Chem. ReV.
2008, 108, 3239–3265. (d) Gorin, D. J.; Sherry, B. D.; Toste, F. D. Chem.
ReV. 2008, 108, 3351–3378. (e) Skouta, R.; Li, C.-J. Tetrahedron 2008,
64, 4917–4938. (f) Jimenez-Nunez, E.; Echavarren, A. M. Chem. ReV. 2008,
108, 3326–3350. (g) Patil, N. T.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. ReV. 2008, 108,
3395–3442. (h) Fu¨rstner, A.; Davis, P. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 3410–3449. (i) Zhang, L.; Sun, J.; Kozmin, S. A. AdV. Synth. Catal.
2006, 348, 2271–2296. (j) Ma, S.; Yu, S.; Gu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 200–203.
7e
a Reaction concentration was 0.05 M. Estimated by H NMR using
diethyl phthalate as internal reference. c The geometries of 3 were determined
by NOESY1D experiments. d 98% isolated yield. e The rest of the starting
material remained unreacted.
b
1
was the competitive formation of enone 4. While other metal
complexes such as VO(acac)2 and MeReO3 failed to improve
this reaction, we turned to modify MoO2(acac)2. It was
recently reported that dinuclear molybdenum complexes
Mo2O5(acac)2L2 (L ) DMF, Ph3PO, DMSO, H2O, HMPA,
etc.) could be readily prepared from MoO2(acac)2 and polar
compounds (i.e., L) in 96% ethanol.9 While our attempts to
(3) (a) Yu, M.; Li, G.; Wang, S.; Zhang, L. AdV. Synth. Catal. 2007,
349, 871–875. (b) Yu, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2147–
2150. (c) Zhao, J.; Hughes, C. O.; Toste, F. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 7436–7437. (d) Yu, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. Tetrahedron 2009, 65,
1846–1855.
(4) Egi, M.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Fujiwara, N.; Akai, S. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
1867–1870.
(5) AgOTf was used to generate Ph3PAu+ OTf- and presumably does
not participate in the catalysis.
(6) (a) Engel, D. A.; Dudley, G. B. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4027–4029. (b)
Ramo´n, R. S.; Marion, N.; Nolan, S. P. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1767–1773.
(7) For a review, see: Negishi, E. J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576, 179–
194.
(8) Mezailles, N.; Ricard, L.; Gagosz, F. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4133–4136.
(9) Pedrosa, M. R.; Escribano, J.; Aguado, R.; D´ıez, V.; Sanz, R.; Arna´iz,
F. J. Polyhedron 2007, 26, 3695–3702.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 16, 2009
3647