H. Yin et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 1265–1270
1269
under the optimized reaction conditions were tested. Selecting
ethanolamine as the model amine, the corresponding N-arylation
products were obtained in high yields (Table 2, entries 6–9). When
2-aminobutanol was chosen, significant electronic effects were ob-
served for the electron-poor and electron-rich substituted aryl ha-
lides (Table 2, entries 10–11). Electron-donating substituents
showed lower reactivity than electron-withdrawing substituents.
In addition, we found that more complicated aryl iodides worked
well, affording the amination product in an excellent yield (Table
2, entry 12).
In view of these interesting results, we further investigated the
scope of the reaction using various substrates. When ethylene gly-
col or morpholine was used, no product was observed (Table 2,
entries 13–14). However, when ethylenediamine was used, the de-
sired amination products were obtained in an 82% yield at room
temperature, and a yield of 98% was obtained when the reaction
was performed at 0 °C (Table 3, entry 1).22 Diamines are a special
class of amines that are capable of forming stable chelates with a
metal atom, whereas their use as substrates in reactions normally
fails because the formation of chelates may hinder the catalytic
process. Guilard and co-workers reported a selective, convenient
palladium-catalyzed introduction of aryl moieties into diamines
without using any protecting group.23
With the optimized reaction conditions identified for ethylene-
diamine, the other diamines were examined. A high yield was
observed for 1,3-propanediamine (Table 3, entry 2), and a moder-
ate yield was observed for 1,2-propanediamine (Table 3, entry 3).
1,4-Butanediamine gave a poor yield (Table 3, entry 4). We then
evaluated a variety of aryl halides, in which both electron-with-
drawing and -donating groups were tolerated (Table 3, entries
5–7).
Furthermore, we investigated the coupling reaction of aryl
bromides with amino alcohols and diamines. Almost no desired
product was attained at room temperature, but when the reaction
temperature was increased to 90 °C, bromobenzene and ethanol-
amine gave a 99% yield of the product (Table 4, entry 1). The effi-
cacy of the system for various bromides with ethanolamine was
further evaluated. Both electron-withdrawing and electron-donat-
ing groups worked well (Table 4, entries 2–4). Other amino alco-
hols were then used as substrates, and all of them afforded
moderate to good yields (Table 4, entries 5–7). However, a lower
yield was observed for 2-aminobutanol, even at temperatures as
high as 110 °C (Table 4, entry 8). In addition, chlorides failed to un-
dergo this transformation under the standard reaction conditions,
and the coupling reaction of aryl bromides with diamines afforded
much lower yields even with an extended reaction time of 24 h
(Table 4, entry 9).
reaction of amine substrates with CuCl produced a five- or six-
membered chelator I, and subsequent oxidative addition of the
chelator I with an aryl halide led to the formation of intermediate
II. Treatment of the amine substrates with II in the presence of
KOH provided complex III, and then reductive elimination of III
gave the N-arylation product and the chelator I. The mechanism
not only explains the reactivity order of aryl halides, ArI > Ar-
Br > ArCl, but also the lower reactivity of steric amines. This mech-
anism can also rationalize the failure of morpholine as the
substrate, because it must be in boat conformation in order to form
chelator I with Cu, which however, is disfavored. In addition, rela-
tive lower yield of 4-aminobutanol can be explained with the more
difficulty in the formation of seven-membered chelator I with Cu,
compared to five- or six-membered ring.
In summary, we have developed a simple and facile method for
the C–N cross-coupling of amino alcohols and diamines with aryl
halides using CuCl under ligand-free and solvent-free conditions.
This method is convenient, cost effective, environmentally friendly,
and the work-up is easy. The reactions are efficient, affording the
cross-coupled products in short reaction times with high yields.
Currently, we are exploring substrate scope and the application
of the Cu-catalyzed N-arylation under ligand-free and solvent-free
conditions with regard to the synthesis of pharmaceutical
molecules.
Acknowledgments
We thank to the National Natural Science Foundation of China
for supporting this research (Grant No. 20942006, Grant No.
21072095) and the research grants provided by the open fund of
key laboratory of Synthetic Chemistry of Natural Substance, Shang-
hai Institute of Organic Chemistry, CAS.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. (a) Beccalli, E. M.; Broggini, G.; Martinelli, M.; Sottocornola, S. Chem. Rev. 2007,
107, 5318–5365; (b) Corbert, J. P.; Mignani, G. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 2651–
2710; (c) Ley, S. V.; Thomas, A. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5400–5449.
2. (a) Ullmann, F. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1903, 36, 2382–2384; (b) Hassan, J.;
Sevignon, M.; Gozzi, C.; Schulz, C.; Lemaire, M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1359–
1469.
3. (a) Klapars, A.; Antilla, J. C.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 7727–7729; (b) Altman, R. A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2779–
2782; (c) Strieter, E. R.; Bhayana, B.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
78–88.
On the basis of the presented results, we propose a possible
mechanism for the reactions (Fig. 1). The mechanism of the reac-
tion may be similar to amino acid promoted copper catalysis. The
4. (a) Gujadhur, R.; Venkataraman, D.; Kintigh, J. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42,
4791–4793; (b) Gujadhur, R. K.; Bates, C. G.; Venkataraman, D. Org. Lett. 2001,
3, 4315–4317.
5. (a) Kiyomori, A.; Marcoux, J. F.; Buchwald, S. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2657–
2660; (b) Liu, L.; Frohn, M.; Xi, N.; Do. minguez, C.; Hungate, R.; Reider, P. J. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 10135–10138.
R
R
1
2
R
R
1
2
ArX
6. (a) Antilla, J. C.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 11684–
11688; (b) Klapars, A.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
7421–7428.
HN
Ar
N(OH)
X
HN
N(OH)
Cu
Cu
oxidative addition
I
7. Kwong, F. Y.; Klapars, A.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 581–584.
8. Chen, Y. J.; Chen, H. H. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 5609–5612.
9. Jiang, D.; Fu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 672–674.
10. Kwong, F. Y.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 793–796.
11. (a) Shafir, A.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8742–8743; (b) Xi, Z.;
Liu, F. Y.; Zhou, C. W. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4254–4259.
12. Lv, X.; Bao, W. L. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3863–3867.
13. Cristau, H. J.; Cellier, P. P.; Spindler, J. F.; Taillefer, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10,
5607–5622.
14. Zhang, H.; Cai, Q.; Ma, D. W. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 5164–5173.
15. Rao, H.; Fu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 8107–8109.
16. Yang, M.; Liu, F. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8969–8971.
17. (a) Chang, J. W. W.; Xu, X. H.; Chan, P. W. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 245–
248; (b) Huang, Y. Z.; Miao, H.; Zhang, Q. H.; Chen, C.; Xu, J. Catal Lett. 2008,
II
R
1
R
2
+
KOH
H N
2
NH(OH)
ArNu
(NuH)
R
R
1
2
-
X
HN
Ar
N(OH)
Nu
Cu
III
Figure 1. Proposed Mechanism.