H. Nagase et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 121–124
123
tent than morphine).3a,b These results support our working
hypothesis that the position of the amide side chain in KNT-63
Table 1
Binding affinity of KNT-62 (1b), KNT-63 (1a), TRK-820, and naltrexone for opioid
receptorsa
(1a) would play an important role for
j agonist activity and selec-
b
c
Compound
Ki (
l
)
(nM)
Ki (j)
(nM)
Ki (d)d (nM)
tivity. The pharmacological effects of KNT-63 (1a) support our
hypothesis that the C-ring in an active TRK-820 conformation
may be in the boat form with an interaction between the 14-OH
and the amide nitrogen.
KNT-62 (1b)
KNT-63 (1a)
TRK-820
0.205
0.212
0.582
0.335
0.152
0.111
0.225
0.373
3.23
2.73
96.5
20.7
Naltrexone
The location of the amide side chain in KNT-63 (1a), a bit upper
a
Binding assay was carried out in duplicate using homogenate of guinea-pig
than that of NS22, would lead to more
j selectivity and more
brain (j: cerebellum, l and d: forebrain).
potent analgesic activity for KNT-63 (1a). Detailed SARs of KNT-
63 (1a) derivatives are now under investigation.
b
[3H]DAMGO was used.
[3H]U-69,593 was used.
[3H]NTI was used.
c
d
We also reported that putative
the bicyclo[2.2.2]octene skeleton showed no
antinociceptive effect induced by TAN-821 was not antagonized
by either nor-BNI, antagonist b-FNA, or NTI. Only b-endorphin
[1–27], which is a prototypical putative antagonist, antagonized
the analgesia produced by TAN-821, which means TAN-821 would
be a putative agonist not a , and d agonist. Other TAN-821
derivatives having the bicyclo[2.2.2]octene skeleton also showed
putative selectivity. The structures of KNT-63 (1a) and TAN-821
e
agonist TAN-821 (Fig. 1) with
j
selectivity.5 The
(Table 1). KNT-63 (1a) showed more
(Ki = 0.111 nM for and Ki = 0.212 nM for
(1b) (Ki = 0.152 nM for
ated the antinociceptive effect induced by sc-administered KNT-63
(1a) using the acetic acid writhing test (AAW test). A sc-adminis-
tration of KNT-63 (1a) produced a strong antinociceptive effect
(ED50 = 0.0063 mg/kg) in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). This
j
l
selective affinity
l
j
) than did KNT-62
e
j
and Ki = 0.205 nM for l). We then evalu-
e
j, l
e
differ by the type of the atom at the 8 position, that is, O in
analgesia was antagonized by
antagonist naloxone (NLX) and d antagonist NTI (Fig. 5B). NS22
showed the same affinity for (Ki = 0.134 nM) and receptors
(Ki = 0.135 nM) and antinociceptive effect (ED50 = 0.1 mg/kg)
through
receptor.3c As a result, KNT-63 (1a) showed slightly
higher selectivity for the receptor and a 16-fold improved anal-
gesic activity in comparison to NS22.
The analgesic activity of KNT-63 (1a) was almost the same as
that of TRK-820 (ED50 = 0.0033 mg/kg) in AAW test (100-fold po-
j antagonist nor-BNI, but not by l
KNT-63 (1a) and C in TAN-821. The 14-OH in TRK-820 also played
an important role for
effect of the atom (C, O, or N) at the 8 position on
j
selectivity.3b,c We are now investigating the
l
j
j
selectivity.
In conclusion, a novel 4,5-epoxymorphinan derivative with an
oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octane skeleton, KNT-63 (1a) was designed and
synthesized on the basis of an active TRK-820 conformation, the
boat conformation, with interaction between the 14-OH and the
amide nitrogen. The designed KNT-63 (1a) showed stronger anal-
j
j
gesia than that of the previously reported
j agonist NS22 whose
amide side chain was positioned a bit lower than that of KNT-63
(1a). The antinociceptive effect of KNT-63 (1a) (ED50 = 0.0063
mg/kg) was almost as potent as that of TRK-820.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial supports from Shorai Foundation
for Science and the Uehara Memorial Foundation. We also
acknowledge the Institute of Instrumental Analysis of Kitasato Uni-
versity, School of Pharmacy for its facilities.
References and notes
1. Dhawan, B. N.; Cesselin, F.; Raghubir, R.; Reisine, T.; Bradley, P. B.; Portoghese,
P. S.; Hamon, M. Pharmacol. Rev. 1996, 48, 567.
2. Fujii, H.; Nagase, H. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13, 1109. and references cited
therein.
3.
j Agonists: (a) Nagase, H.; Hayakawa, J.; Kawamura, K.; Kawai, K.; Takezawa,
Y.; Matsuura, H.; Tajima, C.; Endo, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1998, 46, 366; (b)
Kawai, K.; Hayakawa, J.; Miyamoto, T.; Imamura, Y.; Yamane, S.; Wakita, H.;
Fujii, H.; Kawamura, K.; Matsuura, H.; Izumimoto, N.; Kobayashi, R.; Endo, T.;
Nagase, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 9188; (c) Nemoto, T.; Fujii, H.; Narita,
M.; Miyoshi, K.; Nakamura, A.; Suzuki, T.; Nagase, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2008, 18, 6398.
4. d Agonists: (a) Nagase, H.; Kawai, K.; Hayakawa, J.; Wakita, H.; Mizusuna, A.;
Matsuura, H.; Tajima, C.; Takezawa, Y.; Endoh, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1998, 46,
1695; (b) Nagase, H.; Yajima, Y.; Fujii, H.; Kawamura, K.; Narita, M.; Kamei, J.;
Suzuki, T. Life Sci. 2001, 68, 2227; (c) Nagase, H.; Osa, Y.; Nemoto, T.; Fujii, H.;
Imai, M.; Nakamura, T.; Kanemasa, T.; Kato, A.; Gouda, H.; Hirono, S. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 2792.
5. A putative
e agonist: Fujii, H.; Narita, M.; Mizoguchi, H.; Murachi, M.; Tanaka,
T.; Kawai, K.; Tseng, L. F.; Nagase, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 4133.
6. (a) Lahti, R. A.; Von Voigtlander, P. F.; Barsuhn, C. Life Sci. 1982, 31, 2257; (b)
Szmuszkovicz, J.; Von Voigtlander, P. F. J. Med. Chem. 1982, 25, 1125; (c) Von
Voigtlander, P. F.; Lahti, R. A.; Ludens, J. H. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1983, 224, 7.
7. Lahti, R. A.; Mickelson, M. M.; McCall, J. M.; Von Voigtlander, P. F. Eur. J.
Pharmacol. 1985, 109, 281.
8. (a) Millan, M. J. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1990, 11, 70. and references cited therein;
(b) Porreca, F.; Bilsky, E. J.; Lai, J. In The Pharmacology of Opioid Peptides; Tseng,
L. F., Ed.; Harwood Academic: Singapore, 1995; pp 219–248. and references
cited therein.
Figure 5. (A) Antinociceptive effect induced by KNT-63 (1a) in the acetic acid
*
**
writhing (AAW) assay. : p <0.05 versus vehicle, : p <0.01 versus vehicle. (B)
Effects of opioid receptor antagonists on the antinociception induced by KNT-63
9. Funada, M.; Suzuki, T.; Narita, M.; Misawa, M.; Nagase, H. Neuropharmacology
1993, 32, 1315.
**
(1a) in AAW test. : p <0.01 versus vehicle/vehicle, ##: p <0.01 versus vehicle/KNT-
63 (1a).