S. Routier et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 43 (2002) 589–591
591
After hydrolysis, tert-butanol, CO2 and HF are effec-
tively produced. Another possibility was b-elimination12
(b), which gives the amide, isobutene, CO2 and HF
under the acidic cleavage conditions. In both cases, HF
was neutralised by the released amide.
At first sight, mechamism (a) seems more appropriate
to explain the inertness of tert-butyl ester derivatives.
Scheme 2. Reaction performed with a bis-N-Boc indolic com-
pound containing a maleimide group.
Several N-Boc protected aromatic compounds are eas-
ily deprotected by Bu4NF. This method is compatible
with several acidic and basic sensitive groups, like
esters, aldehydes or maleimides. Selective deprotection
could be achieved with substrates containing both aro-
matic and aliphatic N-Boc groups. Studies are in pro-
gress to trap the intermediates with electrophiles and to
provide more insight into this reaction.
10a and 10b were isolated in 82 and 10% yield, respec-
tively. When increasing the quantity of Bu4NF (10
equiv.), compound 10 was converted to 10a and 10b in
22 and 74% yield, respectively. A further reaction could
be performed with the isolated compound 10a to afford
10b in 94% yield. All reactions were performed in 8 h.
Silyl derivatives are often utilized to protect hydroxy
groups or free indolic nitrogen atoms. A common mode
of deprotection consists of the use of a fluorinated
References
1. Jarowinski, K.; Kocienski, P. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 2001, 2109–2135.
2. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 1999; pp. 518–525 and 617–618.
agent. For 2-OTBDMS-N-Boc-aniline,
a selective
deprotection of oxygen atoms was realized using 1.1
equiv. of reagent at room temperature. The 2 hydroxy-
N-Boc aniline was obtained in 91% yield.
3. Buon, C.; Chacun-Lefe`vre, L.; Rabot, R.; Bouyssou, P.;
Coudert, G. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 605–614.
4. Marcantoni, E.; Massaccesi, M.; Torregiani, E.; Bartoli,
G.; Bosco, M.; Sambri, L. J Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 4430–
4432.
5. Jackson, R. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5163–5165.
6. Strazzolini, P.; Melloni, T.; Giumanini, A. G. Tetra-
hedron 2001, 57, 9033–9043.
7. Yasuhara, A.; Sakamoto, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
595–596.
8. Standard procedure: N-Boc-indole 1 (200 mg, 0.92 mmol)
was dissolved under argon in 6 mL of dry THF. A 1 M
solution of Bu4NF (4.6 mL, 4.6 mmol) in THF was then
added and the reaction mixture was refluxed for 8 h.
After cooling to room temperature, water (20 mL) was
added. After extraction with AcOEt (2×20 mL), the
organic layers were washed with brine (10 mL), dried
with Na2SO4, filtered and the solvent was removed under
reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by flash
chromatography (petroleum ether/AcOEt 98/2) to afford
indole 1a (98 mg, 91%).
In the case of aminoalkyl compounds, deprotection was
not so easy; 10 equiv. of reagent were needed to afford
the free amine 11a in only 54% yield with recovery of
the starting material 11 (44% yield). Selectivity between
indole and amino alkyl deprotection was studied using
compound 12 which bears both aliphatic and indolic
N-Boc protection. Only the indolic deprotection was
observed in all cases. 5 equiv. of reagent afforded only
12% of mono indolic deprotected product 12a whereas
10 equiv. of reagent afforded 67% of 12a. This reaction
was achieved in 8 h with 15 equiv. of TBAF. Com-
pound 12a was directly extracted and could be used
without further purification.
Several proposals could explain the mechanism of this
reaction (Scheme 3). First, fluorine may be assimilated
as a nucleophile9,10 (a) which directly added to the
carbonyl group. The aminated residue could be consid-
ered as a leaving group and Boc-F was produced.11
9. Soon, H. W.; Parker, M. H.; Ploypradith, P.; Northrop,
J.; Posner, G. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 1533–1536.
10. Moughamir, K.; Atmani, A.; Mestdagh, H.; Rolando, C.;
Francesch, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7305–7306.
11. Dang, V. A.; Olofson, R. A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55,
1851–1854.
12. Coutant, C.; Jacquinet, J.-C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1995, 1573–1581.
Scheme 3. Postulated mechanism.