Journal of the American Chemical Society
COMMUNICATION
Scheme 4
Figure 1. ORTEP plot of 25 (the counterion has been omitted for
clarity). The part of the structure to the left of H1 is disordered. Selected
bond lengths (Å) and angles (deg): B1ÀN1, 1.58; N1ÀC1, 1.48;
N1ÀC2, 1.48; N1ÀC3, 1.48; B1ÀN1ÀC1, 112; B1ÀN1ÀC2, 106;
B1ÀN1ÀC3, 112.
examples in Scheme 3, insertion into methyl CÀH bond is
strongly favored over insertion into the methylene CÀH
bond. Further experimental and computational investigations
of this unusual transformation are ongoing and will be reported
separately.
may be limited by slow regeneration of the H-bridged inter-
mediate 2 (Scheme 2), corresponding to the reaction of bor-
enium salt 4 with amine borane 1 in the stoichiometric reaction.
However, when a solution of 4 in C6D5Br was treated with 2
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
equiv of Me3N BH3 at room temperature, the symmetrical
3
H-bridged cation 2511 was detected by NMR assay among other
S
Supporting Information. Experimental procedures, X-ray
b
products. This observation provides evidence of facile intermo-
crystallography data (CIF), NMR spectra and computational
results. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
lecular hydride transfer from Me3N BH3 to 4, and by analogy
3
from 1 to 4, and suggests that other steps in the catalytic process
control the rate of catalyst turnover (see the discussion of
Scheme 4 below).
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
To confirm the assignment, 25 was prepared independently by
treating Me3N BH3 with 0.5 equiv of Tr[B(C6F5)4] in dry
3
Corresponding Author
benzene (eq 1), and the structure was established by X-ray
crystallography (Figure 1).19 Prior studies have proposed related
structures based on NMR evidence or theoretical considera-
tions.11,20,21
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported by the National Institute of General
Medical Sciences of the NIH (GM067146). The authors thank
Dr. J. W. Kampf for the X-ray structure determination of 25.
In response to review, hypothetical catalytic cycles are drawn
in Scheme 4. The activation and quenching steps are well-
defined, and regeneration of the activated precatalyst ii via
hydride transfer from the starting amine borane i to the initial
product v is plausible. However, it would be too early to propose
a rate-determining step. The borocations mentioned within the
black box include borenium salts or their hydride-bridged
equivalents, but several other cations are conceivable in view of
the rich chemistry of amine boranes. The high temperature
required for the catalytic method suggests that activated species
other than 7 are present,22 in contrast to the stoichiometric
reaction, but a role for 7 is not excluded.
In summary, we have shown the feasibility of N-directed CÀH
borylation via borocations derived from hindered amine BH3
complexes using either stoichiometric or catalytic activation by
strong electrophiles. When performed using stoichiometric
Tr[B(C6F5)4], cyclization of 1 proceeds at ambient temperature,
generating the unique unstabilized BÀH borenium salt 4 and
hydrogen. This observation demonstrates that the inherent
barrier for CÀH insertion is quite low. Although the correspond-
ing catalytic process using Tf2NH activation requires temperatures
above 120 °C for catalyst turnover on a practical time scale, the
borylation products are formed cleanly. According to several
’ REFERENCES
(1) Hurd, D. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 2053.
(2) (a) Winternitz, P. F.; Carotti, A. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960,
82, 2430. (b) Logan, T. J.; Flautt, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 3446.
(c) Brown, H. C.; Murray, K. J.; M€uller, H.; Zweifel, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1966, 88, 1443. (d) Abruscato, G. J.; Tidwell, T. T. J. Org. Chem. 1972,
37, 4151. (e) Varela, J. A.; Pe~na, D.; Goldfuss, B.; Denisenko, D.;
Kulhanek, J.; Polborn, K.; Knochel, P. Chem.—Eur. J. 2004, 10, 4252 and
references therein.
(3) (a) K€oster, R.; Reinert, K. Angew. Chem. 1959, 71, 521.
(b) K€oster, R.; Larbig, W.; Rotermund, G. W. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1965, 682, 21. (c) K€oster, R.; Benedikt, G.; Fenzl, W.; Reinert, K. Justus
Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1967, 702, 197.
(4) De Vries, T. S.; Prokofjevs, A.; Harvey, J. N.; Vedejs, E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 14679 and references therein.
(5) Goldfuss, B.; Knochel, P.; Bromm, L. O.; Knapp, K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4136.
(6) (a) Goldfuss, B. Chem.—Eur. J. 2009, 15, 12856. (b) Swinnen,
S.; Nguyen, V. S.; Sakai, S.; Nguyen, M. T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009,
11, 9703.
(7) DePuy, C. H.; Gareyev, R.; Hankin, J.; Davico, G. E.; Krempp,
M.; Damrauer, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5086.
(8) Cho, J.-Y.; Iverson, C. N.; Smith, M. R., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 12868.
20058
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja208093c |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 20056–20059