8172
B. P. Bandgar et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 17 (2009) 8168–8173
3H), 7.37–7.35 (m, 3H), 7.10 (d, 1H, J = 16.1 Hz), 6.59 (dd, 1H,
J = 2 Hz, 2 Hz), 6.50 (d, 1H, J = 2 Hz), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s, 3H) ; m/
z = 429 (M+1).
Stock solutions of different compounds (1 mM) were mixed
with DPPH methanol solution (0.5 mL, 0.3 mM) in 3 mL of total
reaction mixture and allowed to react at room temperature. After
30 min, absorbance values were measured at 520 nm and con-
verted to % antioxidant activity. For a comparative study the Butyl-
ated hydroxyl anisole (BHA) was used as the standard. The
percentage inhibition activity was calculated by using a formula.
The data are summarized in Table 3.
4.2.7. 3-[3-(3-Chloro-phenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-1-
(2,4-dimethoxy-phenyl)-propenone (3g)
Light yellow solid, mp: 127 °C, IR (KBr):
mmax: 3060, 2941, 1674,
1608, 1430, 1212, 825 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.19 (s,
.
1H), 7.77–7.75 (m, 4H), 7.65 (d, 1H, J = 16.4 Hz), 7.59–7.57 (m,
2H), 7.45–7.40 (m, 1H), 7.35 (m, 3H), 7.2 (d, 1H, J = 16.4 Hz), 6.49
(dd, 1H, J = 2 Hz, 2 Hz), 6.40 (d, 1H, J = 2 Hz), 3.81 (s, 3H), 3.80 (s,
3H) ; m/z = 445 (M+), 447 (M+2).
% antioxidant activity
¼ ½1 ꢀ OD of test compound=OD of control compoundꢁ ꢂ 100
4.5. Antimicrobial activity (agar diffusion method)
4.2.8. 3-[3-(2-Chloro-phenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-1-
(2,4-dimethoxy-phenyl)-propenone (3h)
Antimicrobial activity of all synthesized compounds was deter-
mined by agar diffusion method.27,28 All human pathogenic bacte-
ria viz. Bacillus megaterium (MTCC 1684), Bacillus subtilis (MTCC
1789), Klebsiella pneumoniae (NCIM 2957), Staphylococcus aureus
(MTCC 96), Proteus vulgaris (MTCC 1771), Escherichia coli (MTCC
1650) and fungi viz. Trichoderma viridae (MTCC 167), Aspergillus fla-
vus (MTCC 2501) and Aspergillus niger (MTCC 1781) were procured
from the Institute of Microbial Technology (IMTech), Chandigarh,
India and the National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms
(NCIM), Pune, India. Stock solutions of compounds were diluted
in dimethyl sulfoxide (1% DMSO) to give a final concentration rang-
Light yellow solid, mp: 121 °C, IR (KBr):
mmax: 3062, 2943, 1679,
1610, 1431, 1214, 832 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.43 (s,
.
1H), 7.79–7.77 (m, 4H), 7.65 (d, 1H, J = 16.4 Hz), 7.58–7.56 (m,
3H), 7.41–7.39 (m, 1H), 7.35 (m, 3H), 7.1 (d, 1H, J = 15.7 Hz), 6.43
(dd, 1H, J = 2 Hz, 2 Hz), 6.39(d, 1H, J = 2 Hz), 3.85 (s, 3H), 3.84 (s,
3H) ; 445 (M+).
4.2.9. 3-[3-(2,4-Dichloro-phenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-1-
(2,4-dimethoxy-phenyl)-propenone (3i)
Yellow solid, mp: 162 °C, IR (KBr):
mmax: 3061, 2957, 1680, 1632,
1427, 1212, 830 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.22 (s, 1H),
.
ing from 50 to 500 lg/mL for determining the MIC value. Minimum
7.79–7.76 (m, 3H), 7.59 (d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz), 7.58–7.57 (m, 2H),
7.44–7.41 (m, 1H), 7.35 (m, 3H), 7.19 (d, 1H, J = 16.0 Hz), 6.59
(dd, 1H, J = 2 Hz, 2 Hz), 6.44 (d, 1H, J = 2 Hz), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.81 (s,
3H) ; m/z = 479 (M+).
inhibitory concentration (MIC) was defined as the lowest concen-
tration of compound required for a complete inhibition of the fun-
gal and bacterial growth after incubation time. For antifungal
activity, different fungal spore suspensions in sterile distilled water
were adjusted to give a final concentration of 106 cfu/mL. An inoc-
ulum of 0.1 mL spore suspension of each fungus was spread on
Sabouraud’s Dextrose agar plates (HiMedia). For antibacterial
activity Muller Hinton agar was used (HiMedia) seeded with
0.1 mL of the respective bacterial culture strains suspension pre-
pared in a sterile saline (0.85%) of 105 cfu/mL dilution. The wells
of 6 mm diameter were filled with 0.1 mL of each compound dilu-
tion separately for each test of fungi and bacterial strain. The
DMSO (1%) alone was used as a control. The antibiotic nystatin
4.2.10. 1-(2,4-Dimethoxy-phenyl)-3-[3-(2,4-dimethoxy-
phenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl]-propenone (3j)
Yellow solid, mp: 110 °C, IR (KBr):
mmax: 3096, 2935, 1680, 1619,
1428, 1240, 838 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 8.22 (s, 1H),
.
7.76 (d, 1H), 7.75–7.73 (m, 3H), 7.64 (d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz), 7.48–
7.47 (m, 3H), 7.30–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.21 (d, 1H, J = 16.2 Hz), 6.59
(dd, 1H, J = 2 Hz, 2 Hz), 6.45 (d, 1H, J = 2 Hz), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.85 (s,
3H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 3.83 (s, 3H) ; m/z = 471 (M+1).
(30 lg/mL) and tetracycline (10 lg/mL) are used as reference anti-
4.3. Anti-inflammatory and cytotoxicity assay
fungal and antibacterial agents, respectively, for comparison. Inoc-
ulated plates in duplicate were then incubated at 37 0.5 °C for
antibacterial activity for 24 h and 48 h at 28 0.2 °C for antifungal
activity. After incubation the antimicrobial activity was measured
in terms of the zone of inhibition in mm as shown in Table 4.
Proinflammatory cytokine production by lipopolysaccharide
(LPS) in THP-1 cells was measured according to the method de-
scribed by Hwang et al. During assay, THP-1 cells were cultured in
RPMI 1640 culture medium (Gibco BRL, Pasley, UK) containing
100 U/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin containing 10%
fetal bovine serum (FBS, JRH). Cells were differentiated with phorbol
myristate acetate (PMA, Sigma). Following cell plating, the test com-
pounds in 0.5% DMSO were added to each well and the plate was
incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Finally, LPS (Escherichia coli 0127:B8,
Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) was added, at a final concentra-
4.6. In silico pharmacological property and SAR study
The pharmacological properties of the compounds, such as
molecular weight, c Log P and quantum chemical descriptors such
as EHOMO (Energy of highest occupied molecular orbital) and ELUMO
(Energy of lowest unoccupied molecular orbital) of the synthesized
compounds were calculated using a BioMed CaChe 6.1 (FujiSuit
Ltd), a computer aided molecular design modeling tool for win-
dows ME 9820000 and XP operating system. Other parameters
such as HBA, HBD, molecular PSA, drug score and drug likeness
of the compounds were also studied using online Osiris property
explorer for drug bioavailability of chemical compounds. Since
compounds are considered for oral delivery, they were also as-
sessed for toxicity using in silico ADME prediction methods.23,24
tion of 1
for 24 h in 5% CO2. After incubation, supernatants were harvested,
and assayed for TNF- and IL-6 by ELISA as described by the manu-
lg/mL in each well. Plates were further incubated at 37 °C
a
facturer (BD Biosciences). The cells were simultaneously evaluated
for cytotoxicity using CCK-8 from Dojindo Laboratories. Percent
inhibition of cytokine release compared to the control was calcu-
lated.25 The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) values were calcu-
lated by a nonlinear regression method as shown in Table 2.
4.4. In vitro antioxidant activity (DPPH method)
Acknowledgements
The compounds (3a–j) were evaluated for their in vitro free rad-
ical scavenging activity by the 2,20diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl
(DPPH) radical scavenging method.26
The authors are thankful to Dr. Somesh Sharma, Piramal Life
Sciences, Mumbai, for anti-inflammatory activity and to the