coefficients of the dimeric catalyst, Bis-HQN-SQA (4b), did
not show any appreciable dependence on the concentration
(DD = À0.04 Â 10À10 m2 sÀ1), in contrast to the monomeric
catalyst 5a. On the basis of the experimental (Fig. 2) and
DOSY (Table 2) results, it is now clear that the self-association
phenomenon is negligible in the case of the dimeric catalyst
Bis-HQN-SQA (4b).
allowing their repeated recycling without any loss of turnover time
or enantioselectivity (experimental details, see ESIw) (Scheme 3).
In summary, we developed self-association-free, bifunctional,
squaramide-based dimeric cinchona alkaloid organocatalysts
which showed unprecedented catalytic activity and the highest
levels of enantioselectivity reported to date in the dynamic
kinetic resolution (DKR) reaction of a broad range of racemic
azlactones, affording a variety of natural and non-natural
a-amino acid derivatives. We also showed that our DKR
protocol can be applied to the stereoinversion of chiral
a-amino acids. Moreover, the robust nature of these catalysts
toward chemicals allowed for a convenient ‘‘one-pot’’ process
starting from the racemic N-protected a-amino acids. Further-
more, the poor solubility of these catalysts in organic solvents
enabled their easy recovery by a simple precipitation method,
allowing their repeated recycling without any loss of turnover
time or enantioselectivity.
Having established Bis-HQN-SQA (4b) and Bis-HQD-SQA
(4e) as the highly enantioselective and self-association free
catalysts for the preparation of both enantiomers of a-amino
acids via the DKR process, we undertook to explore the scope
of the substrate and nucleophile (R3OH) (Table S-3 in ESIw).
All reactions were carried out in one-pot starting from the
N-protected racemic amino acids 2, derived from valine,
leucine, tert-leucine, 2-aminobutyric acid, 2-amino-4-pentenoic
acid, cyclohexylalanine, alanine, phenylalanine, DOPA, tyrosine
and phenylglycine in the presence of the catalyst 4b or 4e in
CH2Cl2 (0.5 M) at rt or À20 1C (for experimental details,
see ESIw). As shown in Table S-3, in all cases (entries 1–15 of
Table S-3) except phenylglycine, the squaramide-based
dimeric catalyst, Bis-HQN-SQA (4b), was insensitive to the
substituents (R1 and R2) of 2 as well as the nucleophiles
R3OH, thus allowing the DKR reaction to proceed with nearly
quantitative yields and unprecedentedly high levels of
enantioselectivity. Highly enantioenriched (R)-configured
amino esters (up to 92% ee) could also be obtained using
the hydroquinidine derived catalyst Bis-HQD-SQA (4e)
(entries 17–20 of Table S-3). It should also be noted that our
DKR protocol can be applied to the stereoinversion of chiral
a-amino acids. For example, the optically pure N-benzoyl-(R)-
valine ((R)-2a) gave the N-benzoyl-(S)-valine allyl ester
((S)-3a) with 96% ee after alcoholytic DKR with catalyst
Bis-HQN-SQA (4b) (entry 22 of Table S-3). The corresponding
R-isomer was also obtained in 91% ee with the catalyst
Bis-HQD-SQA (4e) from N-benzoyl-(S)-valine ((S)-2a)
(entry 21 of Table S-3). Our DKR products, N-protected amino
esters, was also successfully transformed into more valuable
N-protected amino acids without racemization by hydrolysis
with LiOH, showing the utility of the DKR products.
We gratefully acknowledge the KRF-2008-005-J00701
(MOEHRD), NRF-20090063002 (SRC program) and
R31-2008-000-10029-0 (WCU program) for financial support.
Notes and references
1 (a) K. Faber, Chem.–Eur. J., 2001, 7, 5004–5010; (b) H. Pellissier,
Tetrahedron, 2003, 59, 8291–8327; (c) N. J. Turner, Curr. Opin.
Chem. Biol., 2004, 8, 114–119.
2 J. De Jersey and B. Zerner, Biochemistry, 1969, 8, 1967–1974.
3 S. A. Brown, M.-C. Parker and N. J. Turner, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry,
2000, 11, 1687–1690 and references therein.
4 K. Gottwald and D. Seebach, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 723–738.
5 L. Xie, W. Hua, A. S. C. Chan and Y.-C. Leung, Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry, 1999, 10, 4715–4728.
6 J. Liang, J. C. Ruble and G. C. Fu, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
3154–3155.
7 (a) A. Berkessel, F. Cleemann, S. Mukherjee, T. N. Muller and
¨
J. Lex, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 807–811; (b) A. Berkessel,
S. Mukherjee, F. Cleemann, T. N. Muller and J. Lex, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 1898–1900.
¨
8 A. Peschiulli, C. Quigley, S. Tallon, Y. K. Gun’ko and
S. J. Connon, J. Org. Chem., 2008, 73, 6409–6412.
9 H. S. Rho, S. H. Oh, J. W. Lee, J. Y. Lee, J. Chin and C. E. Song,
Chem. Commun., 2008, 1208–1210.
´ ´ ´ ´
10 G. Tarkanyi, P. Kiraly, S. Varga, B. Vakulya and T. Soos,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 6078–6086.
11 (a) S. J. Connon, Chem. Commun., 2008, 2499–2510; (b) X. Yu and
W. Wang, Chem.–Asian J., 2008, 3, 516–532.
´ ´
12 B. Vakulya, S. Varga, A. Csampai and T. Soos, Org. Lett., 2005, 7,
Finally, the recyclability of the catalysts was also examined.
The squaramide-based dimeric cinchona alkaloid catalysts
4a–e are poorly soluble in all organic solvents,14 and
thus could readily be recovered using a simple precipitation
method. Upon the completion of the reaction, the addition of
hexane induced the complete precipitation of the catalysts,
1967–1969.
13 The monomeric hydroquinine squaramide 5a was prepared according
to the reported procedure for cinchonine analogue; J. P. Malerich,
K. Hagihara and V. H. Rawal, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130,
14416–14417.
14 Although the squaramide-based dimeric catalysts are poorly
soluble in all organic solvents, to our delight, they dissolved into
the clear solution during the reaction.
15 (a) C. S. Johnson Jr, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 1999, 34,
203–256; (b) Magn. Reson. Chem., ed. G. Morris, 2002, 20, S2
(special issue on ‘NMR and diffusion’).
16 Diffusion coefficient value (D) was corrected by employing TMS as
an internal standard. See also; E. J. Cabrita and S. Berger,
Magn. Reson. Chem., 2001, 39, S142–S148.
17 Due to the poor solubility of squaramide catalysts in organic
solvents, we were not able to determine the diffusion coefficients
at higher concentrated conditions.
Scheme 3 Catalyst recycling experiments.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2009
7226 | Chem. Commun., 2009, 7224–7226