mediated chemistry. To date, only a few examples of
complete alkyl to aryl palladium rearrangement via intramo-
lecular C-H activation have been reported by Larock and
others without using norbornene, and all reactions occurred
on the aromatic site.7 Moreover, regioselective attack at either
the aromatic or alkyl site of palladacycle 2 remains a
challenging task. Herein, we report for the first time that
five-membered palladacycle 2 could be regioselectively
trapped by Heck, as well as Suzuki cross-coupling or
cyanation to give migration “off” product 3 (path a) or
migration “on” product 4 (path b) by manipulating the
reaction conditions (Scheme 1). Also of note is that these
product, was obtained in 42% yield.10 This unexpected result
promted us to obtain a clear picture of how various reaction
variables affect the C-H activation. A wide variety of
reaction conditions (bases, additives, solvents, and temper-
atures) were examined, and some of the representative results
are shown in Table 1. Interestingly, when 18-crown-6 was
Table 1. Optimization of Pd-Catalyzed Domino Reaction of 1a
and K4[Fe(CN)6]·3H2Oa
Scheme 1. Condition-Controlled Pd-Catalyzed Domino
entry temp (°C)
solvent
additive product (yield, %)b
Reactions from Iodobenzene Derivatives
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
120
120
120
120
90
DMF
DMF
DMF/H2O (95:5)
DMF
DMF
DMF
4a (42)
3a (49)
3a (52)
3a (29), 4a (52)
3a (22), 4a (62)
4a (78)
18-C-6
TBAC
TBAC
TBAC
60
60
DMF/H2O (95:5) TBAC
3a (60)
a General reaction conditions: concentration 0.04 M in solvent, 0.05
equiv of Pd(OAc)2, 1.0 equiv of 1a, 0.22 equiv of K4[Fe(CN)6]·3H2O, 1.0
equiv of Na2CO3, and 1.0 equiv of additive. b Isolated yield.
Pd-catalyzed domino reactions involving intramolecular
C-H activation could be achieved under normal Heck
reaction conditions without ligands. Another advantage of
this method is that a diverse range of carbo- or heterocycles
can be prepared starting from the same substrate, which is
consistent with atom- and step-economy.8
In connection with a total synthesis project using the Heck-
cyanation cascade reaction as key step, compound 1a was
employed as a model.9 To our surprise, compound 4a, an
intramolecular C-H activation via 1,4-palladium migration
added as an additive, only the normal Heck-cyanation product
3a was obtained in 49% yield (entry 2). These results
indicated clearly that the regioselectivity of the palladacycle
could be controlled by manipulating the reaction conditions.
When DMF/H2O (95:5) was used as solvent the sole product
3a was obtained in 52% yield (entry 3).11 We have found
that upon the addition of tert-butylammonium chloride
(TBAC) described by Jeffery,12 the yield of 4a was increased
to 52% (entry 4), along with 29% of 3a. To our delight,
simply lowering the reaction temperature to 60 °C led to an
improvement and gave 4a as an exclusive product in 78%
yield (entry 6). Most interesting, the sole compound 3a was
obtained in 60% yield by using DMF/H2O (95:5) as solvent
(entry 7). Thus, the regioselectiVity of palladacycle could
be controlled in the presence/absence of water.7c,11 It is
noteworthy that TBAC is not essential to the C-H activation,
but its presence could shorten the reaction time and minimize
side reactions.
Having established the optimal reaction conditions, the
scope of the palladium migration “on” process was first
examined. Aryl halides 1b-e, representing different
heterocyclic skeleton types, were smoothly transformed
to the desired products (4b-e) in good to excellent yields
(Figure 1).
An interesting question is whether the arylpalladium
intermediates can be trapped by other traditional palladium-
catalyzed chemistry which could broaden the scope and
(5) (a) Faccini, F.; Motti, E.; Catellani, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 78. (b) Catellani, M.; Mealli, C.; Motti, E.; Paoli, P.; Perez-Carren˜o,
E.; Pregosin, P. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 4336.
(6) Ca´mpora, J.; Gutie´rrez-Puebla, E.; Lo´pez, J. A.; Monge, A.; Palma,
P.; Del R´ıo, D.; Carmona, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3641.
(7) (a) Huang, Q.; Fazio, A.; Dai, G.; Campo, M. A.; Larock, R. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7460. (b) Wang, L.; Pan, Y.; Jiang, X.; Hu,
H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 725. (c) Ca´mpora, J.; Lo´pez, J. A.; Palma,
P.; Valerga, P.; Spillner, E.; Carmona, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
147. (d) Heck, R. F. J. Organomet. Chem. 1972, 37, 389.
(8) (a) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471. (b) Wender, P. A.; Handy,
S. T.; Wright, D. L. Chem. Ind. 1997, 765. (c) Schreiber, S. L. Science
2000, 287, 1964. (d) Burns, N. Z.; Baran, P. S.; Hoffmann, R. W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2854.
(9) (a) Pinto, A.; Jia, Y.; Neuville, L.; Zhu, J. Chem.sEur. J. 2007, 13,
961. (b) Sundermeier, M.; Zapf, A.; Mutyala, S.; Baumann, W.; Sans, J.;
Weiss, S.; Beller, M. Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 1828.
(10) For leading reviews, see: (a) Ma, S.; Gu, Z. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 7512. For recent examples, see: (b) Karig, G.; Moon, M.-T.;
Thasana, N.; Gallagher, T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3115. (c) Campo, M. A.;
Larock, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14326. (d) Campo, M. A.;
Huang, Q.; Yao, T.; Tian, Q.; Larock, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
11506. (e) Zhao, J.; Campo, M.; Larock, R. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 1873. (f) Campo, M. A.; Larock, R. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007,
129, 6298. (h) Kesharwani, T.; Larock, R. C. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 6090.
(i) Barder, T. E.; Walker, S. D.; Martinelli, J. R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4685. (g) Chaumontet, M.; Piccardi, R.; Audic, N.;
Hitce, J.; Peglion, J.-L.; Clot, E.; Baudoin, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 15157.
(11) (a) Chai, D. I.; Lautens, M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3054. (b)
Fors, B. P.; Krattiger, P.; Strieter, E.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
3505.
(12) Jeffery, T. Chem. Commun. 1984, 1287.
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 3, 2010
481