versatility of bent-sandwich compounds in catalysis and
the enhanced reactivity demonstrated here, [PhB(C5H4)-
(OxMe )2]ZrX2-type compounds may offer new possibilities in
2
catalytic chemistry.
We thank the U.S. DOE Office of Basic Energy Science
(DE-AC02-07CH11358) and the ACS Green Chemistry
Institute-Petroleum Research Fund for financial support.
Dr Andreja Bakac is thanked for many helpful discussions.
Notes and references
1 A. Togni and R. L. Halterman, Metallocenes: synthesis, reactivity,
applications, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998.
2 J. W. Lauher and R. Hoffmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98,
1729–1742.
Scheme 1
3 H. Lee, P. J. Desrosiers, I. Guzei, A. L. Rheingold and G. Parkin,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 3255–3256.
product shows the poorest conversion. Two experiments were
performed to support this idea: (1) the reaction rate is slowed
by addition of product, and (2) addition of more substrate
results in further conversion. A plot of kobs vs. [2] (ranging
from 6.8 to 40 mM) reveals a linear dependence on [2],
providing the empirical rate law: ꢀd[5]/dt = k0[5][2] (k0 =
2.0(3) ꢂ 10ꢀ3 Mꢀ1 sꢀ1). A large primary kinetic isotope effect
(kH/kD = 5.4) is determined by comparison of k0 obtained
from 5 and 5-d2 substrates. Interestingly, the rate constant for
cyclization of the less hindered substrate 6 is almost three
4 (a) P. J. Shapiro, E. Bunel, W. P. Schaefer and J. E. Bercaw,
Organometallics, 1990, 9, 867–869; (b) A. L. McKnight and
R. M. Waymouth, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 2587–2598.
5 (a) M. Bochmann, S. J. Lancaster and O. B. Robinson, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 2081–2082; (b) P. J. Shapiro, Eur. J.
Inorg. Chem., 2001, 321–326.
6 D. V. Gribkov and K. C. Hultzsch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004,
43, 5542–5546.
7 B. D. Stubbert and T. J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129,
6149–6167.
8 P. J. Walsh, A. M. Baranger and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1992, 114, 1708–1719.
times larger (k0 = 5.67(5) ꢂ 10ꢀ3 Mꢀ1
s
ꢀ1) than the rate
9 (a) M. C. Wood, D. C. Leitch, C. S. Yeung, J. A. Kozak and
L. L. Schafer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 354–358;
(b) D. A. Watson, M. Chiu and R. G. Bergman, Organometallics,
2006, 25, 4731–4733; (c) H. Kim, P. H. Lee and T. Livinghouse,
Chem. Commun., 2005, 5205–5207.
constant for 5. This difference is not reflected in the ‘turnover
rate’ since the product from 6 shows greater catalyst inhibition
than the product from 5.
Two mechanisms are consistent with the experimental rate
law. The first (Scheme 1a) involves rapid intramolecular
insertion followed by turnover-limiting protonolysis. This
overall sequence is similar to the well-established insertion
mechanism for hydroamination/cyclization,21 with the important
distinction that the relative rate constants for the insertion and
protonolysis steps in the classic mechanism are reversed in our
mechanism. This turnover-limiting protonolysis mechanism is
also consistent with a large kinetic isotope effect and rapid
catalyst initiation. However, facile alkene insertion into a
Zr–N bond is unusual, as is the requirement that protonolysis
be slower than alkene insertion.
10 A. L. Gott, A. J. Clarke, G. J. Clarkson and P. Scott, Chem.
Commun., 2008, 1422–1424.
11 T. E. Muller, K. C. Hultzsch, M. Yus, F. Foubelo and M. Tada,
¨
Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3795–3892.
12 L. Ackermann, R. G. Bergman and R. N. Loy, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2003, 125, 11956–11963.
13 J. F. Dunne, K. Manna, J. Wiench, M. Pruski and A. D. Sadow,
Dalton Trans., DOI: 10.1039/b911851a.
14 A. I. Meyers and E. W. Collington, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 92,
6676–6678.
15 J. F. Dunne, J. C. Su, A. Ellern and A. D. Sadow, Organometallics,
2008, 27, 2399–2401.
16 I. Lopes, G. Y. Lin, A. Domingos, R. McDonald, N. Marques and
J. Takats, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 8110–8111.
17 Y. Shi, C. Hall, J. T. Ciszewski, C. Cao and A. L. Odom, Chem.
Commun., 2003, 586–587.
18 (a) A. Otero, J. Fernandez-Baeza, A. Antinolo, J. Tejeda, A.
Lara-Sanchez, L. Sanchez-Barba, A. M. Rodriguez and
M. A. Maestro, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 1330–1331;
(b) A. Otero, J. Fernandez-Baeza, A. Lara-Sanchez, A. Antinolo,
J. Tejeda, E. Martinez-Caballero, I. Marquez-Segovia, I.
Lopez-Solera, L. F. Sanchez-Barba and C. Alonso-Moreno, Inorg.
Chem., 2008, 47, 4996–5005.
19 Crystal data for C29H45BN4O3Zr (4), M = 599.72, monoclinic,
P21/n, a = 12.7494(5), b = 17.2023(7), c = 13.5397(5) A,
b = 93.952(1)1, V = 2962.5(2) A3, T = 123(2) K, Z = 4, 31 553
reflections collected, 6824 independent reflections (Rint = 0.0382),
R = 0.0274, wR2 = 0.681 [I 4 2s(I)], R = 0.0357, wR2 = 0.0732
(all reflections).
A second mechanism involves reversible substrate coordination,
turnover-limiting a-abstraction to form a zirconium imido
intermediate, and subsequent rapid [2p+2p] cycloaddition
for C–N bond formation (Scheme 1b).9,10 The large isotope
effect is consistent with this mechanism, as a-NH abstraction
reactions have significant isotope effects.22 This mechanism is
also consistent with the observation that a secondary amine
substrate does not undergo cyclization.
Attempts to isolate or trap a zirconium imido in this system
have not yet been successful. However, the lack of reactivity of
the secondary amine 9 is unlikely to be due to steric hindrance.
In addition, related four-legged piano-stool zirconium compounds
are proposed to catalyze hydroamination/cyclization through
an imido pathway.10 For these reasons, we favor the imido
mechanism of Scheme 1b. These catalytic reactions show that
this zwitterionic zirconium compound is activated toward
hydroamination/cyclization of aminoalkenes. Given the general
20 (a) J. H. Espenson, Chemical kinetics and reaction mechanisms,
McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995; (b) K. J. Laidler, Chemical
Kinetics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.
21 M. R. Gagne, C. L. Stern and T. J. Marks, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1992, 114, 275–294.
22 C. P. Schaller, C. C. Cummins and P. T. Wolczanski, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1996, 118, 591–611.
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 339–341 | 341