30
M. Cooper et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 26–30
5. Medicinal chemistry reviews: (a) Lee, H.-K.; Choi, E. B.; Pak, C. S. Curr. Top. Med.
Chem. 2009, 9, 482; (b) Jagerovic, N.; Fernandez-Fernandez, C.; Goya, P. Curr.
Top. Med. Chem. 2008, 8, 205; (c) Muccioli, G. C.; Lambert, D. M. Curr. Med.
Chem. 2005, 12, 1361.
48 had the same potency as the halogen derivatives. Finally, com-
parison of 43 and 53 implied that the amide hydrogen is not an
essential interaction feature.
6. Scheen, A. J.; Paquot, N. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 23,
103.
7. (a) Rosenstock, J.; Hollander, P.; Chevalier, S.; Iranmanesh, A. Diabetes Care
2008, 31, 2169; (b) Després, J. P. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2009, 29, 416;
(c) Després, J. P. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 553.
8. Caraceni, P. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 23, 65.
9. (a) Moreira, F. A.; Grieb, M.; Lutz, B. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009,
23, 133; (b) Viveros, M. P.; deFonseca, F. R.; Bermudez-Silva, F. J.; McPartland, J.
M. Endocr. Metab. Immune. Disord. Drug Targets 2008, 8, 220.
10. Viveros, M. P.; Marco, E. M.; Llorente, R.; López-Gallardo, M. Neural Plast. 2007,
2007, 52908.
These compounds also act as inverse agonists, for example, the
bromo derivative 45 has an IC50 of 1.2 nM in the GTPcS assay. A
selectivity of greater than 1000-fold for CB1 over CB2 was demon-
strated, for a selection of compounds, by testing against the CB2
sub-type receptor in a GTPcS antagonist assay using CP55940 as
agonist (data not shown).
In conclusion, we have explored the CB1 antagonist SAR features
for a chemically diverse library of secondary and tertiary 4-cyano-
methyl-1,5-diphenyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamides. In general
a
11. Kunos, G.; Osei-Hyiaman, D.; Bátkai, S.; Sharkey, K. A.; Makriyannis, A. Trends
Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 1.
12. Lan, R.; Liu, O.; Fan, P.; Lin, S.; Fernando, S. R.; McCallion, D.; Pertwee, R.;
Makriyannis, A. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 769.
range of amide substitutions are tolerated, but polar and especially
charged groups in this part of the molecule reduce the CB1 antago-
nistic activity. Some very potent eastern modifications have been
identified which will form the basis of further work to identify less
lipophilic compounds that do not readily pass the blood–brain-
barrier.
13. The parallel library synthesis was conducted according to either of two
protocols (a) or (b), as follows. (a) Larger scale using 9 parallel tubes: 1-
Hydroxybenzotriazole (HOBt, 47 mg, 1.3 equiv) and 1-ethyl-3(3-dimethyl-
aminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDAC, 77 mg, 1.5 equiv) were added to a stirred
solution of acid III (100 mg, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv) in 15 ml CH2Cl2. After 20 min,
the appropriate amine (1.2 equiv) and diispropylethylamine (DIPEA, 77 mg,
1.3 equiv) were added and stirring continued overnight. Saturated NaHCO3
solution was added and the reaction mixture extracted with CH2Cl2. The
organic phase was washed with brine, dried (MgSO4) and evaporated by
vacuum centrifuge. Final purification was made using semi-preparative
reverse-phase HPLC or normal-phase column chromatography over silica; (b)
Plate chemistry using 1.4 ml tubes in 96 well format: Acid III (0.075 ml of
0.1 M CH2Cl2 solution, 1.5 equiv), PS-DCC (8.1 mg, 2 equiv), HOBt (0.085 ml of
0.1 M CH2Cl2 solution, 1.7 equiv) and PS-DIPEA (2.6 mg, 2 equiv) were mixed in
0.80 ml CH2Cl2. The plate was shaken for 25 min, the appropriate amines
(0.050 ml of 0.1 M N-methylpyrrolidone solution, 1 equiv) were added and
shaking continued for 3 days. Additional CH2Cl2 (0.15 ml) and PS-trisamine
(6.0 mg, 5 equiv) were added to each tube and shaking continued for a further
24 h. The resins were filtered and washed with CH2Cl2. Combined liquors were
evaporated and residues redissolved in DMSO (0.25 ml). Following LC–MS
analysis, the solutions were diluted with further DMSO so as to provide 10 mM
stock solutions for screening.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Rokhsana Andersen and Helle Iversen for
excellent technical assistance.
References and notes
1. Endocannabinoid reviews: (a) Di Marzo, V. Pharmacol. Res. 2009, 60, 77; (b) De
Petrocellis, L.; Di Marzo, V. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 23, 1;
(c) Di Marzo, V.; Ligresti, A.; Cristino, L. Int. J. Obesity 2009, 33, S18; (d) deKloet,
A. D.; Woods, S. C. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 2531.
2. CB1 reviews: (a) Janero, D. R.; Makriyannis, A. Expert Opin. Emerging Drugs
2009, 14, 43; (b) Di Marzo, V. Drug Discovery Today 2008, 13, 1026; (c) Akbas, F.;
Gasteyger, C.; Sjödin, A.; Astrup, A.; Larsen, T. M. Obes. Rev. 2009, 10, 58.
3. (a) Di Marzo, V. Diabetologia 2008, 51, 1356; (b) Mackie, K. Neuroendocrinology
2008, 20, 10.
14. Amengual, R.; Marsol, C.; Mayeux, E.; Sierra, M.; Wagner, P. Patent Appl. PCT
Int. Appl. WO 2006133926, 2006.
4. Ravinet Trillou, C.; Delgorge, C.; Menet, C.; Arnone, M.; Soubrie, P. Int. J. Obes.
2004, 28, 640.
15. Valko, K.; Du, C. M.; Bevan, C.; Reynolds, D. P.; Abraham, M. H. Curr. Med. Chem.
2001, 8, 1137.