propargyl alcohol.10 Using either benzyldimethylsilyl- or
triethoxysilyl-substituted allyl carbonates provided the allyl-
ated product 3 in high yield along with high levels of
enantioselectivity (entries 6 and 7).
Next, we investigated the effects of solvent on the reaction
(Table 2). Enantioselectivities were improved with the use
desilylated product and typically led to substrate decompo-
sition.11 Likewise, the use of acidic conditions, like TFA,
failed to deliver the desired olefin 3a. Fortunately, using
silver fluoride in a mixture of THF, methanol, DMSO, and
water provided the olefin 3a in 96% yield.12 The high
chemoselectivity of this process led us to develop a one-pot
allylation-protodesilylation protocol, which would enhance
the operational simplicity of the synthesis and afford olefin
3a directly from the amidomalonate 4. To our delight, when
amidomalonate 4 was treated under the optimized allylation
conditions (Table 2, entry 3) followed by addition of silver
fluoride upon completion of the allylation, the desired olefin
3a was obtained in 69% yield and 84% ee.
Table 2. Selected Solvent Optimization Studiesa
Next, chemoselective cleavage of the terminal methylene
fragment of olefin 3a to the corresponding carboxylic acid was
investigated. This transformation turned out to be more difficult
than we anticipated, as the pyrrole functionality was prone to
decomposition in the presence of oxidants. Having surveyed a
variety of different conditions,13 we found that a combination
of RuCl3, NaIO4, and K2CO3 facilitated the oxidative cleavage
to the desired carboxylic acid. Use of other oxidative conditions
including ozonolysis, and OsO4 led either to decomposition of
3a or mixtures of oxidation products.14
,
,
entry
solvent
% yieldb c
% eec d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
PhMe
PhHe
C6F6
90 (51)
76
90 (56)
64
88
91
76 (>99)
69
84 (>99)
54
PhCF3
THF
60
56
40
Dioxaned
DCE
Without further purification, the crude acid 2 was converted
to the acyl chloride by treatment with thionyl chloride in THF,
followed by treatment with ammonium hydroxide to afford
amide 12 in 59% yield from olefin 3a (Scheme 4). At this stage,
82
a All reactions were performed with 1 equiv of 4 and 1.1 equiv 5g at 4
°C. b Isolated yield. c Parentheses indicate yield or ee after recrystallization.
d ee determined by chiral HPLC. e Performed at rt.
of aromatic solvents while polar solvents like THF and
dioxane resulted in lower selectivities. Hexafluorobenzene
proved to be the optimal solvent for this transformation,
providing the allylated product 3g in 90% yield and 84% ee
(entry 3). Recrystallization of 3g in pentane provided 3g as
a single enantiomer in 51-56% yield from malonate 4.
With enantiopure vinyl silane 3g in hand, protodesilylation
of the triethoxysilyl group was examined (Scheme 3). The
Scheme 4
Scheme 3
amide 12 was conveniently cyclized to form the A-ring by
treatment with LiHMDS in THF providing ranirestat (1) in
(11) (a) Trost, B. M.; Ball, Z. T.; Thomas, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 7922–7923. (b) Giraud, A.; Provot, O.; Hamze, A.; Brion, J.-D.; Alami,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1107–1110. (c) Chakrapani, H.; Liu, C.;
Widenhoefer, R. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 157–159.
(12) (a) Fu¨rstner, A.; Radkowski, K. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2182–2183.
(b) Trost, B. M.; Sieber, J. D.; Qian, W.; Dhawan, R.; Ball, Z. T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5478–5481.
(13) (a) Miyamoto, K.; Sei, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Ochiai, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 1382–1383. (b) Travis, B. R.; Narayan, R. S.; Borhan, B.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3824–3825. (c) Yu, W.; Mei, Y.; Hua, Z.;
Jin, Z. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3217–3219. (d) Travis, B. R.; Narayan, R. S.;
Bothan, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 3824–3825. (e) Criegee, R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1975, 14, 745–752.
choice of fluoride source proved crucial to this transforma-
tion. TBAF, TBAT, and HF·pyr failed to furnish the proto-
(10) (a) Trost, B. M.; Ball, Z. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12726–
12727. (b) Trost, B. M.; Ball, Z. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17644–
17655.
(14) Carlsen, P. H. J.; Katsuki, T.; Martin, V. S.; Sharpless, K. B. J.
Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3936.
1278
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 6, 2010