Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of ent-2
Table 1. Screening of Conditions for the Reductive Coupling of
6 and 7a
entry
solvent
zinc source
yieldb (%)
dr (syn/anti)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
toluened
THF
Et2Zn
Me2Zn
ZnBr2
Et2Zn
Et2Zn
ZnBr2
Et2Zn
78
78
55
62
20
n.r.
n.d
>20:1
>20:1
1:1
>20:1
>1:20
THF
Et2Oc
>1:20
a To a suspension of Cp2Zr(H)Cl (2 mmol) in the appropriate solvent
at 0 °C under Ar was added 7 (2 mmol). After the suspension had dissolved,
the reaction was cooled to -40 °C and R2Zn (2 mmol) or ZnBr2 (1 mmol)
was added followed by 6 (1 mmol). The reaction was allowed to warm to
0 °C and stirred until completion. b Isolated yields after chromatography.
of a diastereoselective dihydroxylation of 5. We envisioned
that the highly functionalized key intermediate 5 could be
obtained by reductive coupling of Garner’s aldehyde 6 and
protected propargyl alcohol 7, both of which are com-
mercially available. Compounds 6 and 7 can also be
synthesized from readily available starting materials L-serine
and propargyl alcohol, respectively.
c
Determined by H NMR analysis. d The zirconium species was pregen-
1
erated in CH2Cl2; the solvent was evaporated and replaced by the listed
one.
tions as summarized in Table 1. The best results were
obtained using methylene chloride as solvent and either
Me2Zn or Et2Zn as the zinc source (entries 1 and 2). The
alkyne failed to react with zirconocene hydrochloride in
toluene. Instead, the vinylzirconium species had to be
pregenerated in CH2Cl2, followed by solvent evaporation and
redissolution in toluene (entry 4). THF (entry 5) impressively
reversed the stereochemical outcome, although yields were
low and numerous side products were evident. The vinylzir-
conium species was not soluble in Et2O (entry 7), which
accounted for the poor (less than 10%) conversion. Interest-
ingly, changing the zinc source to ZnBr2 produced a 1:1
mixture of diastereomers in dichloromethane (entry 3), while
in THF no reaction took place (entry 6).
With the optimal conditions in hand, the synthesis was
set into motion as outlined in Scheme 2. Treating 7 with
zirconocene hydrochloride in methylene chloride furnished
the vinylzirconium intermediate which was then transmeta-
lated to the corresponding zinc species by treating it with
diethylzinc. Addition of Garner’s aldehyde 6 to the solution
delivered the desired allylic alcohol 5 in good yield
(73-78%) with virtually complete diastereocontrol.11a We
were not able to isolate or detect the anti-congener. The
stereochemistry was assigned by mechanistic considerations
and later confirmed through analysis of ent-2. Similar results
regarding the diastereoselectivity have been published by
Murakami et al.11b Higher yields (78%) were obtained when
the Schwartz reagent was generated in situ using the
Negishi’s protocol.12 Benzyl protection (with in situ genera-
tion of BnI)13 of the free alcohol followed by dihydroxylation
under Upjohn conditions14 delivered diol 4 in an acceptable
61% yield over two steps. Diastereoselectivity was excellent
Several methodologies for synthesis of allylic amino
alcohols such as 5 have been previously investigated in our
group. Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons-type olefination8 fol-
lowed by Lu¨che reduction of the resulting R,ꢀ-unsaturated
ketone delivers amino alcohols in up to 3:1 syn/anti ratio.9
Unfortunately, the enantiomeric purity is eroded in the
process, which is unacceptable. Direct addition of lithium
nucleophiles to Garner’s aldehyde (6) produces the anti
diastereomers in high dr (17:1) as exemplified in our
synthesis of pachastrissamine.10 In the search for a comple-
mentary method for producing the syn diastereomers we
turned to vinylzinc nucleophiles. Vinylzinc species have been
reported to add to R-chiral aldehydes with high syn
selectivity.11b The nucleophile is generated conveniently from
an alkyne such as 7 by a hydrozirconation-transmetalation
sequence pioneered by Peter Wipf.11 Herein we further show
the utility of this reaction and prove for the first time that
these conditions are nonepimerizing.
We first tackled the reductive coupling of 6 and 7. Several
solvents and zinc sources were screened for optimal condi-
(7) For reviews of synthetic methods, see: (a) Pearson, M. S. M.; Mathe-
Allainmat, M.; Fargeas, V.; Lebreton, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2159–
2191. (b) Afarinkia, K.; Bahar, A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1239–
1287. (c) Stu¨tz, A. Iminosugars as Glycosidase Inhibitors: Nojirimycin and
Beyond; Wiley-VCH: New York, 1999. For more recent syntheses of
members of the deoxynojirimycin family, see: (d) Palyam, N.; Majewski,
M. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4390–4392. (e) Bagal, S. K.; Davies, S. G.;
Lee, J. A.; Roberts, P. M.; Russell, A. J.; Scott, P. M.; Thomson, J. E. Org.
Lett. 2009, 12, 136–139. (f) Remgasamy, R.; Curtis-Long, M. J.; Ryu, H. W.;
Oh, K. Y.; Park, K. H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2009, 30, 1531–1534.
(8) Koskinen, A. M. P.; Koskinen, P. M. Synlett 1993, 501–502.
(9) Koskinen, A. M. P.; Koskinen, P. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
6765–6768.
(10) Passiniemi, M.; Koskinen, A. M. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49,
980–983.
(11) (a) Wipf, P.; Xu, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5197–5200. (b)
For an application in total synthesis, see: Murakami, T.; Furusawa, K.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9257–9263.
(12) Huang, Z.; Negishi, E. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3675–3678.
(13) Czernecki, S.; Georgoulis, C.; Provelenghiou, C. Tetrahedron Lett.
1976, 3535–3536.
1146
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 6, 2010