O’Brien et al.
JOCArticle
Introduction
to help advance the fields of functional materials and
molecular machinery,9 short-term goals include investiga-
tions of the types of structural features and supramolecular
architectures that facilitate fast motion in the solid state and
the development of analytical tools to aid the study of such
phenomena.
Among the new venues of artificial molecular machinery,1
studies have centered recently on the potential of molecular,2
coordination,3 and extended solids,4 built with structures
that form a static lattice linked to elements that experience
rapid conformational motions.5 With components at the two
ends of the dynamic spectrum, we proposed the term
“amphidynamic solids” to describe the contrasting proper-
ties of these materials.2 Studies in our group have been
primarily centered on molecular rotors6 based on 1,4-bis-
(triarylpropynyl)benzene7 and related structures2,8 with the
expectation that the two axially disposed and relatively bulky
triarylpropynyl groups acting as a stator6 will provide a low
density “pocket”, where the central phenylene moiety can
play the role of the rotator.6 With structural similarities to
macroscopic gyroscopes, these molecular rotors exhibit
Brownian rotation in the solid state with ambient tempe-
rature exchange frequencies that range from static to
One of the most powerful techniques for the study and
characterization of internal motions in the solid state is 13C
NMR obtained under cross-polarization and magic angle
spinning (CPMAS).10 The technique allows the acquisition
of high-resolution spectra with polycrystalline powder
samples, which under favorable circumstances can be used
to characterize the molecular motions reported by nuclei
experiencing dynamic exchange between magnetically non-
equivalent sites.11 The CPMAS experiment has three key
components that improve the sensitivity and resolution of
the spectrum. The cross-polarization (CP) part is responsible
for signal enhancement by transferring the magnetization
1
from the abundant and sensitive H nuclei to the far less
ca. 109 s-1 2,7,8
While the long-term goal of these studies is
.
abundant and insensitive 13C nuclei. Rapid sample spinning
(e.g., 10 kHz) at the “magic” angle (54.74° relative to the
external magnetic field) removes the line-broadening that
arises from chemical shift anisotropy. The third component
is a strong broadband decoupling RF field that helps remove
the dipolar interactions between the 13C and 1H nuclei.
The intensity of the 13C signals in the CPMAS experiment
is a time-dependent function of cross-polarization and
(1) (a) Michl, Josef; Sykes, E.; Charles, H. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 1042–1048.
(b) Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 431–432. (c) Garcia-Garibay,
M. A. Angew Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8945–8947.
(2) (a) Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102,
~
10793. (b) Khuong, T.-A.; Nunez, J.; Godinez, C.; Garcia-Garibay, M. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 413–422. (c) Karlen, S. D.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Top.
Curr. Chem. 2006, 262, 179–228. (d) Harada, J.; Ogawa, K. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2009, 38, 2244–2252. (e) Nakai, H.; Nonaka, T.; Miyano, Y.; Mizuno, M.;
Ozawa, Y.; Toriumi, K.; Koga, N.; Nishioka, T.; Irie, M.; Isobe, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17836–17845.
1
depends on the strength of the H-13C dipolar coupling.
The intensity of a given signal will depend on the number and
distance of nearby hydrogen atoms and on the “contact
time” allowed for cross-polarization. In a previous commu-
nication we showed that the dependence of signal intensity to
the presence of nearby hydrogen atoms may be used to
highlight signals of interest among many interfering ones
by selectively substituting the latter with 2H nuclei.12 Using
samples of 1,4-bis(3,3,3-tri-d5-phenylpropynyl)benzene 1
with a perdeuterated bis(trityl)-stator and a natural abun-
dance 1,4-phenylene rotator, we were able to carry out a
detailed variable-temperature (VT) analysis of the exchange
dynamics of the central phenylene in desolvated crystals of 1.
In this article, we explore the generality of the method with a
set of structures that includes 4,40-biphenylene (2), 9,10-
anthrylidene (3), 1,4-naphthylidene (4), and 4,40-(1,1-bina-
phthylidene) (5) playing the roles of potential rotators
(Figure 1). While the bulk of the central aromatics in com-
pounds 3-5 and the modest shielding of unsubstituted trityl
groups suggest that rotation in the solid state is unlikely, we
selected them as valuable test systems because they have well-
characterized chromophores that we plan to use in the future
with a set of bulkier, more shielding stators. We expected and
confirmed that the biphenyl rotator of 2 experiences rela-
tively fast rotational dynamics in the solid state. After
showing that the rate of exchange in the case of 2 is too large
to be measured with confidence within the temperature limits
of our spectrometer by CPMAS 13C NMR (T g 200 K), we
carried out its dynamic characterization by quadrupolar
(3) (a) Akutagawa, T.; Shitagami, K.; Nishihara, S.; Takeda, S.;
HasegawaT.; Nakamura, T.; Hosokoshi, Y.; Inoue, K.; Ikeuchi, S.; Miyazaki,
Y.; Saito, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4397–4402. (b) Akutagawa, T.;
Endo, D.; Kudo, F.; Noro, S.-I.; Takeda, S.; Cronin, L.; Nakamura, T. Crys.
Growth Des. 2008, 8, 812–816. (c) Akutagawa, T.; Sato, D.; Koshinaka, H.;
Aonuma, M.; Noro, S.-I.; Takeda, S.; Nakamura, T. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47,
5951–5962. (d) Akutagawa, T.; Nakamura, T. Dalton Trans. 2008, 45, 6335–
6345. (e) Kitagawa, H.; Kobori, Y.; Yamanaka, M.; Yoza, K.; Kobayashi, K.
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 10444–10448.
(4) (a) Gould, S. L.; Tranchemontagne, D.; Yaghi, O. M.;
Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3246–3247. (b)
Winston, E. B.; Lowell, P. J.; Vacek, J.; Chocholousova, J.; Michl, J.; Price,
J. C. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 5188–5191. (c) Bracco, S.; Comotti,
A.; Valsesia, P.; Chmelka, B. F.; Sozzani, P. Chem. Commun. 2008, 39, 4798–
4800. (d) Loeb, S. J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 226–235. (e) Loeb, S. J. In
Organic Nanostructures; Atwood, J. L., Steed, J. W., Eds.; Wiley-VCH:
Weinheim, 2008; pp 33-61.
(5) Alternatives based on crystalline materials that take advantage of
phase transitions have also been suggested: Sokolov, A. N.; Swenson, D. C.;
MacGillivray, L. R. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105, 1794–1797.
(6) We have adopted here the terminology suggested by Kottas et al.
While the term “molecular rotor” is used to describe the entire molecular
assembly, the term “rotator” refers to the component whose rotational
motion is being considered, and the term “stator” to the component that
provides a frame of reference to the describe the motion of the former:
Kottas, G. S.; Clarke, L. I.; Horinek, D.; Michl, J. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105,
1281–1376.
(7) (a) Dominguez, Z.; Dang, H.; Strouse, M. J.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2398–2399. (b) Dominguez, Z.; Dang, H.;
Strouse, J. M.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7719–
7727. (c) Dominguez, Z.; Khuong, T. A. V.; Sanrame, C. N.; Dang, H.;
~
Nunez, J. E.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 8827–
8837. (d) Khuong, T. A. V.; Zepeda, G.; Ruiz, R.; Kahn, S. I.;
Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Cryst. Growth Des. 2004, 4, 15–18. (e) Karlen,
S. D.; Ortiz, R.; Chapman, O. L.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
~
Soc. 2005, 127, 6554–6555. (f) Nunez, J. E.; Khuong, T.-A. V.; Campos,
L. M.; Farfan, N.; Dang, H.; Karlen, S. D.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Cryst.
Growth Des. 2006, 6, 866–873.
(8) (a) Godinez, C. E.; Zepeda, G.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 4701–4707. (b) Godinez, C. E.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Cryst.
Growth Des. 2009, 9, 3124–3128.
(10) Pines, A.; Gibby, M. G.; Waugh, J. S. J. Chem. Phys. 1973, 59, 569–
(9) (a) Leigh, D. A.; Zerbetto, F.; Kay, E. R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007,
46, 72–191. (b) Saha, S.; Stoddart, J. F. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 77–92. (c)
Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Venturi, M. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2008, 9, 202–220. (d)
Vicario, J.; Katsonis, N.; Ramon, B. S.; Bastiaansen, C. W. M.; Broer, D. J.;
Feringa, B. L. Nature 2006, 440, 163.
590.
(11) (a) Braga, D.; Chierotti, M. R.; Garino, N.; Gobetto, R.; Grepioni,
F.; Polito, M.; Viale, A. Organometallics 2007, 26, 2266–2271.
(12) Karlen, S. D.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. Chem. Commun. 2005, 189–
191.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 8, 2010 2483