M. Bonesi et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 1990–1993
1993
solution of 3,4,5-trimethoxy-acetophenone and substituted benzaldehyde in
alcohol a quantity of an aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide (50% w/v) was
added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature under argon for 16 h,
diluted with dichloromethane (30 mL) and acidified to pH 1 with an aqueous
solution of hydrochloric acid 1 N. The separated aqueous layer was extracted
further with dichloromethane (3 Â 30 mL) and the combined organic fractions
dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered and evaporated in vacuo. The
residue was purified by chromatography or crystallization. This procedure
affords the desired chalcones in yields that are always high. Their physico-
chemical properties and the spectra data can be found in Supplementary data.
21. Synthesis of pyrazoles (10–18): A solution of each chalcone 1–9 and methyl-
hydrazine in tetrahydrofuran anhydrous was stirred at room temperature
under argon for 4 h. The resulting mixture was dried over anhydrous
magnesium sulfate, filtered and evaporated in vacuo, and purified by
crystallization from ethyl acetate to yield the desired product. Their physico-
chemical properties and the spectra data can be found in Supplementary data.
The compounds bearing a pyrazole linkage between the two
aromatic rings generally appeared significantly less active than
those bearing a double bound. Therefore, a more flexible linker be-
tween the two phenyl rings appears favorable to increase the ACE
potency in this series. Consequently, compounds derived from 1–9
but with a reduced olefinic linkage should be considered as inter-
esting future prospects.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Dr. Annamaria Caufin, Faculty of
Pharmacy, Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Calabria
for revision of the English version of the manuscript.
22. ACE inhibition assay: Dansylglycine and dansyl-
L-glutamine, Angiotensin I-
Converting Enzyme preparation from rabbit lung (EC 3.4.15.1) were purchased
from Sigma–Aldrich, Milan, Italy. Briefly, each compound was dissolved in
Supplementary data
HEPES assay buffer, to obtain the final concentration ranged from 330 to 50
mL. The ACE solution (25 L) was pre-incubated with a test or control solution
(25 L) for 5 min at 37 °C. The enzyme reaction was started by adding a
combined solution (25 L) of the substrate dansyltriglycine (7.86 mM), and the
internal standard, dansyl- -glutamine (0.353 mM) for a time of incubation
chosen by plotting a calibration curve. The reaction was stopped by adding a
solution of 0.1 N Na2EDTA (50 L). The dansylglycine was quantified by a HPLC
reversed phase with UV detection at 250 nm. Instrumentation: HPLC Perkin
Elmer Series 410 LC pump; Injector Perkin Elmer 20 L loop. Detector Perkin
lg/
l
Supplementary data (experimental procedures, NMR, UV, IR,
MS, and elementary analysis) associated with this article can be
l
l
L
l
References and notes
l
Elmer UV/VIS LC290 spectophotometric; solvent system: ALTECH SN 1250-99,
Part. N° 288215 BIN II 43, HYPERSIL ODS 5u Lot. N° 5002.150 mm  4.6 mm
SN:1250-99; mobile phase: isocratic system—10 mM NaH2PO4 buffer (pH 7)/
acetonitrile (88:12); flow rate 2 mL/min, run time 30 min. Linear calibration
1. Chalmers, J. Blood Press. 1999, 8, 9.
2. Odama, U.; Bakris, G. L. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2000, 2, 312.
3. Kearney, P. M.; Whelton, M.; Reynolds, K.; Whelton, P. K. Lancet 2005, 365, 217.
4. Schricker, K.; Holmer, S.; Hamann, M.; Riegger, G.; Kurtz, A. Hypertension 1994,
24, 157.
curve for dansylglycine was plotting from 0.2 to 25 lg/mL. The decreased
concentration of dansylglycine in the test reaction compared with the control
reaction was expressed as percentage inhibition and calculated from the
equation: Inhibition% = 100 À [(dansylglycine) T/(dansylglycine) C] Â 100,
where T = test reaction and C = control reaction. The therapeutic drug
captopril was used as a reference ACE inhibitor.
5. Paul, M.; Mehr, A. P.; Kreutz, R. Physiol. Rev. 2006, 86, 747.
6. Remuzzi, G.; Ruggenenti, P. Lancet 2006, 368, 555.
7. Carson, P. E. Am. Heart J. 2000, 140, 361.
8. Shlipak, M. G.; Browner, W. S.; Noguchi, H.; Massie, B.; Frances, C. D.;
McClellan, M. Am. J. Med. 2001, 110, 425.
23. Hansen, K.; Nyman, U.; Smith, U. W.; Andersen, A.; Gudiksen, L.; Rajasekharan,
S.; Pushpangadan, P. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1995, 48, 43.
9. Hebert, L. A.; Falkenhain, M. E.; Nahman, N. S., Jr.; Cosio, F. G.; O’Dorisio, T. M.
Am. J. Nephrol. 1999, 19, 1.
24. All experiments were carried out in triplicate. Data were expressed as
means SD. Differences were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA) test completed by a Bonferroni’s multicomparison test. Differences
were considered significant at **p <0.01. The inhibitory concentration 50%
(IC50) was calculated by nonlinear regression with the use of Prism Graphpad
Prism version 4.0 for Windows, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA
percentage of inhibition versus the concentrations.
25. Oh, H.; Kang, D. G.; Kwon, J. W.; Kwon, T. O.; Lee, S. Y.; Lee, D. B.; Lee, H. S. Biol.
Pharm. Bull. 2004, 27, 2035.
26. Häckl, L. P. N.; Cuttle, G.; Sanches, D. S.; Lima-Landman, M. T.; Nicolau, M.
Pharmacology 2002, 65, 182.
10. Miller, M. A.; Texter, M.; Gmerek, A.; Robbins, J.; Shurzinske, L.; Canter, D.
Cardiovasc. Drug Ther. 1994, 8, 271.
11. Sharif, N. M.; Evans, B. L.; Pylypchuk, G. B. Ann. Pharmacother. 1994, 28, 720.
12. Loizzo, M. R.; Tundis, R.; Menichini, F.; Statti, G. A.; Menichini, F. Mini-Rev. Med.
Chem. 2008, 8, 828.
13. Nijveldt, R. J.; van Nood, E.; van Hoorn, D. E.; Boelens, P. G.; van Norren, K.; van
Leeuwen, P. A. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 74, 418.
14. Li, R.; Kenyon, G. L.; Cohen, F. E.; Chen, X.; Gong, B.; Dominguez, J. N.; Davidson,
E.; Kurzban, G.; Miller, R. E.; Nuzman, E. O. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 5031.
15. Ballesteros, J. F.; Sanz, M. J.; Ubeda, A.; Miranda, M. A.; Iborra, S.; Paya, M.;
Alcaraz, M. J. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2794.
16. Yit, C. C.; Das, N. P. Cancer Lett. 1994, 82, 65.
27. Kiss, A.; Kowalski, J.; Melzig, M. F. Planta Med. 2004, 70, 919.
28. Loizzo, M. R.; Said, A.; Tundis, R.; Rashed, K.; Statti, G. A.; Hufner, A.; Menichini,
F. Phytother. Res. 2007, 21, 32.
29. Lacaille-Dubois, M. A.; Franck, U.; Wagner, H. Phytomedicine 2001, 8, 47.
30. Wagner, H.; Elbl, G.; Lotter, H.; Uinea, M. Pharm. Pharmacol. Lett. 1991, 1,
15.
17. Dinkova-Kostova, A. T.; Abeygunawardana, C.; Talalay, P. J. Med. Chem. 1998,
41, 5287.
18. Actis-Goretta, L.; Ottaviani, J. I.; Keen, C. L.; Fraga, C. G. FEBS Lett. 2003, 555,
597.
19. Khang, D. G.; Kim, Y. C.; Sohn, E. J.; Lee, Y. M.; Yin, M. H.; Lee, H. S. Biol. Pharm.
Bull. 2003, 26, 1345.
31. Wagner, H.; Elbl, G. Planta Med. 1992, 58, 297.
32. Strittmatter, S. M.; Snyder, S. H. Mol. Pharmacol. 1986, 29, 142.
33. Chen, C.; Lin, J. Y. J. Nat. Prod. 1992, 55, 691.
20. General experimental procedure for the synthesis of a series of chalcones (1–9):
Aldolic condensations of 3,4,5-trimethoxy-acetophenone with appropriately
substituted benzaldehydes were used for synthesizing
a set of chalcone
34. Parellada, J.; Suarez, G. J. Enzyme Inhib. 1998, 13, 347.
35. Gomez, H. J.; Cirillo, V. J.; Irvin, J. D. Drugs 1985, 30, 13.
derivatives with hydroxyl, nitro, amino, chloro, fluoro, and methoxy
substituents on the B-ring, using commercially available compounds. In a