Carbonyl (Trimethylsilyl)allylation
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 2. Proposed Catalytic Mechanism and Stereochemical Model for Carbonyl (Trimethylsilyl)allylation from the Alcohol or Aldehyde
Oxidation Level
(trimethylsilyl)allylation product 4a was formed along with
substantial quantities of Peterson olefination product. After
various inorganic bases were screened, it was found that
Peterson olefination is suppressed using K3PO4 (1.0 equiv) in
the presence of water (5.0 equiv) for reactions conducted at 70
°C. Under these conditions, R-(trimethylsilyl)allyl acetate 1a
was coupled to a structurally diverse set of aldehydes 2a-i
(Table 1). In each case, good isolated yields were accompanied
by exceptional levels of diastereo- and enantioselectivity. In the
absence of 2-propanol, but under otherwise identical conditions,
(trimethylsilyl)allylation occurs directly from the alcohol oxida-
tion level to furnish an identical set of adducts 4a-i (Table 2).
Again, good isolated yields were accompanied by exceptional
levels of diastereo- and enantioselectivity. Thus, unlike corre-
sponding protocols involving allylmetal reagents,7-11 carbonyl
(trimethylsilyl)allylation occured with equal facility from the
alcohol or aldehyde oxidation level.
The mechanism for catalytic carbonyl (trimethylsilyl)allyla-
tion is analogous to that previously proposed for related
crotylations.2c However, complete levels of anti-diastereose-
lectivity are observed in nearly all cases, suggesting that
carbonyl addition occurs exclusively from the (E)-σ-allyl
through a chairlike transition structure. Notably, although the
catalyst dehydrogenates primary alcohols 3a-i, the reaction
products 4a-i, which are homoallylic alcohols, are not oxidized
under the coupling conditions and, hence, do not experience
any erosion of enantiomeric purity by way of redox equilibra-
tion. This result is remarkable, as 2-propanol, a secondary
alcohol, is oxidized under the coupling conditions when
aldehydes 2a-i are employed as reactants. As indicated in the
proposed catalytic mechanism (Scheme 2), coordination of
iridium to the homoallylic olefin of reaction products 4a-i
provides a hexacoordinate, 18-electron complex that cannot
engage in ꢀ-hydride elimination due to the absence of an open
coordination site.
(7) For examples of carbonyl additions employing 1,3-bimetallic allyl
transfer agents where M1 ) M2 ) Si, see: (a) Corriu, R.; Escudie, N.;
Guerin, C. J. Organomet. Chem. 1984, 264, 207. (b) Restorp, P.;
Fischer, A.; Somfai, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12646. (c)
Restorp, P.; Dressel, M.; Somfai, P. Synthesis 2007, 1576. (d) Tuzina,
P.; Somfai, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 6882.
(8) For examples of carbonyl additions employing 1,3-bimetallic allyl
transfer agents where M1 ) B, M2 ) Si, see: (a) Yatagai, H.;
Yamamoto, Y.; Maruyama, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4548.
(b) Tsai, D. J. S.; Matteson, D. S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 2751.
(c) Yamamoto, Y.; Yatagai, H.; Maruyama, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1981, 103, 3229. (d) Tsai, D. J. S.; Matteson, D. S. Organometallics
1983, 2, 236. (e) Hoffmann, R. W.; Brinkmann, H.; Frenking, G. Chem.
Ber. 1990, 123, 2387. (f) Roush, W. R.; Grover, P. T.; Lin, X.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7563. (g) Roush, W. R.; Grover, P. T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 7567. (h) Barrett, A. G. M.; Malecha,
J. W. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 5243. (i) Roush, W. R.; Grover, P. T.
Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 1981. (j) Hunt, J. A.; Roush, W. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 501. (k) Marron, T. G.; Roush, W. R. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1995, 36, 1581. (l) Hunt, J. A.; Roush, W. R. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 1112. (m) Micalizio, G. C.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2000,
2, 461. (n) Roush, W. R.; Pinchuk, A. N.; Micalizio, G. C. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2000, 41, 9413. (o) Shimizu, M.; Kitagawa, H.; Kurahashi, T.;
Hiyama, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4283. (p) Micalizio,
G. C.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1949. (q) Tinsely, J. M.;
Roush, W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10818. (r) Va, P.; Roush,
W. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15960. (s) Lira, R.; Roush, W. R.
Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4315. (t) Huh, C. W.; Roush, W. R. Org. Lett.
2008, 10, 3371.
To evaluate the utility of the coupling products 4a-i, adducts
4a, 4f, 4g, and 4i were subjected to DMDO-mediated oxidative
elimination.8h,i The 1,4-ene-diols 5a, 5f, 5g, and 5i were
produced in excellent yield with high levels of (E:Z)-selectivity
(Scheme 3). Proto-desilylation was attempted next. Under nearly
all conditions assayed, exclusive formation of Peterson olefi-
nation products was observed. However, upon exposure of
adduct 4g to TiCl4 in the presence of exogenous aldehyde, the
product of proto-desilylation 6g was generated in 73% yield
with complete (E:Z)-selectivity (Scheme 4). In the absence of
aldehyde, Peterson olefination was again the exclusive reaction
product, suggesting that exogenous aldehyde protects the
hydroxyl moiety of 4g through formation of a titanium-bound
hemiacetal. Notably, compound 6g was previously prepared in
seven steps from malic acid.12 Thus far, the proto-desilylation
is most efficient for the benzyl ether-containing adduct 4g
(Scheme 4).
(9) For examples of carbonyl additions employing 1,3-bimetallic allyl
transfer agents where M1 ) Si, M2 ) Ti, see: (a) Sato, F.; Suzuki, Y.;
Sato, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 4589. (b) Reetz, M. T.;
Wenderoth, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 5259. (c) Reetz, M. T.;
Steinbach, R.; Westerman, J.; Peter, R.; Wenderoth, B. Chem. Ber.
1985, 118, 1441. (d) Ikeda, Y.; Yamamoto, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1986, 59, 657. (e) Ducray, R.; Ciufolini, M. A. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 4688. (f) de Fays, L.; Adam, J.-M.; Ghosez, L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 7197.
(10) For examples of carbonyl additions employing 1,3-bimetallic allyl
transfer agents where M1 ) Si, M2 ) Cr, see: (a) Hodgson, D. M.;
Wells, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4761. (b) Paterson, I.; Schlap-
bach, A. Synlett 1995, 498.
(11) For examples of carbonyl additions employing 1,3-bimetallic allyl
transfer agents where M1 ) Si, M2 ) Sn, see: (a) Lautens, M.; Ben,
R. N.; Delanghe, P. H. M. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 7221.
(12) Austad, B. C.; Hart, A. C.; Burke, S. D. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2011,
and references cited therein.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 132, NO. 26, 2010 9155