C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
and excitation mode. As a consequence of the opposite temperature
dependence of the de, oppositely signed ∆∆Hq and ∆∆Sq values
were obtained for the direct and CT excitations. It should be noted
that the positive de, or the preferred formation of (1′S,2S)-3, is an
incidental phenomenon only in the temperature range employed
and that the epimeric product should be obtained at lower and higher
temperatures upon direct and CT excitation, respectively.
in the exciplex, where the interaction occurs at the carbonyl (to
give oxetane). The diastereoselectivities at low temperatures, where
the enthalpy dominates the steric consequence of the peripheral
modification (from 1a to 1b, Table 2), and the substantial solvent
effect (Figure S4) jointly support this conclusion. The stereoselec-
tivities in acetonitrile were low for both excitation modes, presum-
ably because of dissociation of the radical ionic species, keeping
distinctly different linear correlations.
In this study, we have demonstrated for the first time that the
conventional exciplex and the excited CT complex are independent,
noninterconvertible excited species that possess distinctly different
structures and reactivities, occasionally leading to opposite stere-
ochemistries. The magnitude of ∆∆Sq is appreciably larger for the
direct excitation than for the CT excitation. This seems reasonable,
as the exciplex is relatively flexible and susceptible to environmental
variants such as temperature, while the CT complex is better stacked
to each other in the ground state and seems to be less flexible in
the excited state, giving the significantly smaller differential
activation parameters.
Table 1. Temperature Effects on the Diastereoselective
Paterno´-Bu¨chi Reaction of 1a or 1b with 2 upon Direct and CT
Excitationa
% de of 3a
direct
% de of 3b
direct
temperature (°C)
CT
CT
50
25
0
-25
-50
77
64
63
43
34
3
4
3
24
26
74
71
-
18
22
-
41
44
-
68
a Using a methylcyclohexane solution of 1 (0.2 M) and 2 (1.0 M)
irradiated at 290 nm for direct excitation (3 h for 3a or 5 h for 3b) and
at 330 nm for CT-band excitation (10 h for 3a or 13 h for 3b).
Acknowledgment. This work is dedicated to the memory of
Professor Jay Kazuo Kochi. The support of this work by a Grant-
in-Aid for Scientific Research, JSPS (T.M. and Y.I.), the Mitsubishi
Chemical Corporation Fund (T.M.), and the Sumitomo Foundation
(T.M.) are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Prof. S. Grimme
for the fruitful discussion of theoretical aspects.
Table 2. Activation Parameters for the Formation of
Diastereomeric Oxetanes 3a and 3b in the Paterno´-Bu¨chi
Reaction of 1a or 1b with 2 upon Direct and CT Excitationa
substrate
excitation mode
∆∆Hq (kJ mol-1
)
∆∆Sq (J mol-1 K-1
)
1a
direct
CT
direct
CT
+6.4
-3.3
+1.6
-3.8
+39
-10
+21
-9
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
theoretical calculations, spectroscopic data, and a CIF file. This material
1b
a See Figure S2 in the Supporting Information for the Eyring plots.
References
The magnitudes of ∆∆Hq and ∆∆Sq also depend on the mode
of excitation, i.e., the activation parameters are significantly larger
for direct excitation than for CT excitation, except for the ∆∆Hq
for 1b. In this Paterno´-Bu¨chi reaction occurring in the singlet
manifold, the photocyclization likely proceeds through a concerted
mechanism or a short-lived singlet 1,4-biradical, and hence, the
diastereofacial-differentiating complexation of chiral cyanobenzoate
1 with alkene 2 plays a decisive role in determining the product’s
de (unless the efficiency of the subsequent cycloaddition consider-
ably differs between the diastereomeric complexes). If this is the
case, the activation parameters gained upon direct and CT excitation
directly reflect the enthalpic and entropic contributions to the
exciplex and CT complex formation, respectively. The first excited
singlet state of cyanobenzoates is mostly π-π* in nature but
borrows some intensity from the n-π* state, as indicated by the
theoretical calculations (Figure S3). When such an excited state of
cyanobenzoate interacts with an electron-rich alkene to form an
exciplex, the interaction is expected to occur near the carbonyl
group. The larger ∆∆Sq values for the direct excitation may be
related to the relatively flexible structure of the exciplex thus
formed. On the other hand, the CT complexation is achieved in
general by maximizing the π overlap between the donor and
acceptor to give a conformationally rigid structure,15 which is also
supported by the dispersion-corrected DFT calculations16 (Figure
1, right). Because of the strong π-π stacking, the excited CT
complex is not be able to gain conformational freedom upon
excitation, and the entropic difference between the members of the
diastereomeric pair should be much smaller than that for the
exciplex pair, in nice agreement with the experimental results (Table
2). The lower selectivities upon CT excitation may be attributed to
the fact that the chiral auxiliary is located at a more distant position
from the point of interaction (arene-arene) in the CT complex than
(1) (a) Wang, M.; Cornett, B.; Nettles, J.; Liotta, D. C.; Snyder, J. P. J. Org.
Chem. 2000, 65, 1059. (b) Wuitschik, G.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Mu¨ller, K.;
Fischer, H.; Wagner, B.; Schuler, F.; Polonchuk, L.; Carrieira, E. M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7736.
(2) (a) Griesbeck, A. G.; Fiege, M. In Molecular and Supramolecular
Photochemistry; Ramamurthy, V., Schanze, K. S., Eds.; Marcel Dekker:
New York, 2000; Vol. 6, p 33. (b) Fleming, S. A.; Bradford, C. L.; Gao,
J. J. In Molecular and Supramolecular Photochemistry; Ramamurthy, V.,
Schanze, K. S., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1997; Vol. 1, p 187.
(3) (a) Bach, T.; Jo¨dicke, K.; Kather, K.; Fro¨hlich, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 2437. (b) Bach, T.; Jo¨dicke, K.; Kather, K.; Hecht, J. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 2271.
(4) (a) Griesbeck, A. G.; Bondock, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6191. (b)
Adam, W.; Peters, K.; Peters, E. M.; Stegmann, V. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 2958. (c) Bach, T.; Bergmann, H.; Harms, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1999, 121, 10650.
(5) (a) Freilich, S. C.; Peters, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3819. (b)
Freilich, S. C.; Peters, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 6255.
(6) Lhiaubet-Vallet, V.; Encinas, S.; Miranda, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 12774.
(7) Buschmann, H.; Scharf, H.-D.; Hoffmannn, N.; Esser, P. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 477.
(8) (a) Abe, M.; Kawakami, T.; Ohata, S.; Nozaki, K.; Nojima, M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2838. (b) Adam, W.; Stegmann, V. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 3600. (c) Adam, W.; Stegmann, V. R.; Weikno¨tz, S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2452.
(9) (a) Griesbeck, A. G.; Fiege, M.; Bondock, S.; Gudipati, M. S. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 3623. (b) Griesbeck, A. G.; Bondock, S.; Cygon, P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 9016.
(10) (a) Saito, H.; Mori, T.; Wada, T.; Inoue, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
1900. (b) Saito, H.; Mori, T.; Wada, T.; Inoue, Y. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1909.
(11) (a) Nicolet, O.; Banerji, N.; Page`s, S.; Vauthey, E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005,
109, 8236. (b) Levy, D.; Arnold, B. R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 2113.
(12) Shigemitsu, Y.; Katsuhara, Y.; Odaira, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 12, 2887.
(13) We chose 330 and 290 nm for CT and direct excitation, respectively.
Although the irradiation at 290 nm may excite a hidden CT band, its effect
seems to be small, as the de was distinctly different or even opposite in
sign.
(14) Eyring, H. J. Chem. Phys. 1935, 3, 107.
(15) (a) Rosokha, S. V.; Kochi, J. K. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 1727. Also
see: (b) Kobayashi, T.; Yoshihara, K.; Nagakura, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1971, 44, 2603.
(16) Grimme, S.; Antony, J.; Schwabe, T.; Mu¨uck-Lichtenfeld, C. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2007, 5, 741.
JA907156J
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 131, NO. 47, 2009 17077