4868
A. Kamal et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4865–4869
G0
G1
S
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
G2/M
Figure 4. Effect of chalcone linked imidazolones (TMAC, CA-4, 6 and 8) on the
expression of apoptotic proteins (ProCaspase-7) and cleavage PARP. Here MCF7
cells treated with 30 M concentration of compounds. CA-4 was used as positive
l
control. Cell lysates were collected and western blot analysis was carried out with
the above mentioned antibodies and b-actin was used as loading control.
24 h cell lysates were extracted and subjected to Western blot
analysis using antibodies procaspase-7 and cleavage specific PARP.
It was observed that there is a decrease in the level of procaspase-7
and cleaved PARP (87 kDa) in compounds 6 and 8, and there is no
significant difference in case of CA-4 and TMAC. Thus indicating
that in compounds 6 and 8 apoptotic cell death takes place in a cas-
pase dependent pathway as shown in Figure 4.
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
Compounds
Figure 3a. Histogram depicting the different phases of cell cycle in MCF-7 cells
In conclusion, in the present study, a series of novel chalcone
linked imidazolones were prepared and evaluated for their anti-
cancer activity against a panel of 53 human tumour cell lines de-
rived from nine different cancer types. Some of these hybrids like
6 and 8 showed good anti-cancer activity with GI50 values ranging
exposed to chalcone imidazolone hybrid compounds (6 and 8) at 10
indicated are mean of three experiments).
l
M (values
G0
G1
S
from 1.26 to 10.5 lM. The FACS analysis data clearly showed that
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
these compounds (6 and 8) arrest the cell cycle at G2/M phase.
Some of the compounds like 6 and 8 from this series have shown
promising activity and useful in the design and development of
new molecules based on these leads.
G2/M
Acknowledgements
We thank the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, for anti-can-
cer assay in human cell lines. The authors (G.R.K., P.R. and A.V.)
thank to CSIR and UGC, New Delhi for financial assistance.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
0
References and notes
1
2
3
4
5
6
8
1. Petitt, G. R.; Gragg, G. M.; Herald, D. L.; Schmidt, J. M.; Lohavanijaya, P. Can. J.
Chem. 1982, 60, 1374.
2. Mc Gown, A. T.; Fox, B. W. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1990, 26, 79.
3. Young, S. L.; Chaplin, D. J. Expert Opin. Invest. Drugs 2004, 13, 1171.
4. Petitt, G. R.; Temple, C., Jr.; Narayanan, V. L.; Varma, R.; Simpson, M. J. Anti-
cancer Drug Des. 1995, 10, 299.
5. (a) Petitt, G. R.; Rhodes, M. R.; Herald, D. L.; Chaplin, D. J.; Stratford, M. R. L.;
Hamel, E.; Petitt, R. K.; Chapuis, J.; Oliva, D. Anti-cancer Drug Des. 1998, 13, 981;
(b) Nam, N. H.; Kim, Y.; You, Y.-J.; Hong, D.-H.; Ki, H.-M.; Ahn, B.-Z. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 3073.
Compounds
Figure 3b. Histogram depicting the different phases of cell cycle in MCF-7 cells
exposed to chalcone imidazolone hybrid compounds (6 and 8) at 30 M concen-
tration. CA-4 was used as a positive control. TMAC was the starting material for the
chalcone imidazolone compounds (values indicated are mean of three
experiments).
l
6. Won, S. J.; Liu, C.-T.; Tsao, L.-T.; Weng, J.-R.; Ko, H.-H.; Wang, J.-P.; Lin, C.-N. Eur.
J. Med. Chem. 2005, 40, 103.
7. Hsieh, H.-K.; Tsao, L.-T.; Wang, J.-P.; Lin, C.-N. J. Pharm. Pharm. 2000, 52, 163.
8. Mukerjee, S.; Kumar, V.; Prasad, A. K.; Raj, H. G.; Bracke, M. E.; Olsen, C. E.; Jain,
S. C.; Parmar, V. S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2001, 9, 337.
9. Parmar, V. S.; Jain, S. C.; Bisht, K. S.; Sharma, N. K.; Himanshu Gupta, S.; Prasad,
A. K.; Jha, A.; Poonam Malhotra, S.; Sharma, S. K.; Brache, M. E.; Errington, W.;
Olsen, C. E.; Wengel, J. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1998, 37, 628.
10. Nielsen, S. F.; Boesen, T.; Larsen, M.; Schonnig, K.; Kromann, H. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2004, 12, 3047.
11. Ducki, S.; Forrest, R.; Hadfield, J. A.; Kendall, A.; Lawrence, N. J.; Mc Gown, A. T.;
Rennison, D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1998, 8, 1051.
12. Lawrence, N. J.; Mc Gown, A. T.; Ducki, S.; Hadfield, J. A. Anti-cancer Drug Des.
2000, 15, 135.
13. Siamaki, A. R.; Black, D. A.; Arndtsen, B. A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1135.
14. Fang, L.; He, Q.; Hu, Y.; Yang, B. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2007, 59, 397.
from these studies clearly revealed the G2/M arrest caused by
these compounds. The concentration of 10 lM concentration was
found to be optimum by our in vitro cytotoxic studies.
Previous studies by Twiddy et al. have discovered that caspase-
7 and PARP play an important role in causing apoptosis in human
breast cancer cells.21 Mooney and coworkers have also reported
that activation of the caspase cascade leads to cleavage of DNA re-
pair enzyme poly-ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) in Staurosporine
induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells.22 Therefore, in the present
investigation human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were treated with
30 lM concentration of compounds CA-4, 6, 8 and TMAC. After