R. J. Gleave et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 4951–4954
4953
Table 2
Table 4
P2X7 inhibition at human and rat receptors together with metabolic stability for
Solubility profile of compounds 1 and 10 (lg/mL, 1 h)
compounds 10–16
Aqueous media
pH
Solubility
F
1
10
N
Water
110
100
120
410
920
900
370
F
O
Fed state simulated intestinal fluid (FeSSIF)
Fasted state simulated intestinal fluid (FaSSIF)
Simulated gastric fluid
5
6.5
1.2
N
R3
R2
>1000
R2
R3
Human (rat)
P2X7 pIC50
Human (rat) Clib
(mL/min/g liver)
c log Pc
a
The hydrochloride salt of compound 10 was selected for further
evaluation of its developability profile since it showed the best
overall combination of potency and metabolic stability in both spe-
cies. The compound showed a moderate level of protein binding
(HSA 91% bound) and was not a potent competitive inhibitor of
Cl
Cl
N
H
10
11
Me
Et
7.4 (6.5)
7.0 (6.8)
3.0 (3.4)
20 (13)
4.0
F
CYP1A2, 2C9, 2C19, 2D6 and 3A4 with an IC50 of 5.5
lM at 3A4
N
H
4.6
and >10
l
M at each of the other isoforms.12 Solubility was assessed
F
in water and a number of simulated physiological fluids (Table
4).13 The data showed an improved profile compared with the pyr-
azole lead with high solubility in water, gastric fluid and simulated
fed state fluid. The compound showed moderate solubility in the
fasted state fluid, which may be a reflection of the fluid having a
pH value close to the measured pKa of compound 10 (6.47).
Compound 10 was also tested against 35 other ion channels,
receptors and enzymes. No significant off-target activity was ob-
served. Following on from this positive data the in vivo pharmaco-
kinetics of 10 were assessed in the rat. The compound was
administered orally at 3 mg/kg.14 Promisingly, oral exposure was
Cl
N
H
12
13
Me
Et
7.5 (6.2)
7.4 (6.4)
16 (16)
—
4.3
4.9
Cl
N
H
N
H
14
15
16
Et
7.3 (6.2)
7.2 (<5)
6.9 (6.0)
>50 (>50)
4.9
3.5
4.0
Cl
F
F
observed with
a Cmax of 0.43 lM ( 0.04), AUC (0–6 h)/dose
F
F
N
H
Me
Et
—
6.8 min kg/L ( 0.5) and a Tmax of 0.5 h indicating rapid absorption.
In summary, a combination of homologation and cyclisation
synthetic steps proved to be a versatile route to a number of tet-
ra-substituted imidazoles. This enabled a range of analogues to
be prepared for SAR studies. Replacement of the central core of
the pyrazole screening hit 1 with an imidazole was well tolerated.
Potency was successfully retained across a range of analogues at
both the human and rat receptor, whilst aqueous solubility was in-
creased. Several strategies were employed to block potential sites
of metabolism and to increase the in vitro metabolic stability.
Compound 10 was identified with an encouraging combination
of P2X7 inhibition and rat oral exposure and therefore with a suit-
able profile to take forward into in vivo PD studies.
F
F
N
H
18 (3.6)
a–c
See footnotes to Table 1 for details.
Table 3
P2X7 inhibition at human and rat receptors together with metabolic stability for
compounds 17–19
F
N
F
O
References and notes
N
R2
R3
1. Colomar, A.; Marty, V.; Médina, C.; Combe, C.; Parnet, P.; Amédée, T. J. Biol.
Chem. 2005, 278, 30732.
2. Hughes, J. P.; Hatcher, J. P.; Chessell, I. P. Purinergic Signalling 2007, 3, 163.
3. Collo, G.; Neidhart, S.; Kawashhima, E.; Kosco-Vilbois, M.; North, R. A.; Buell, G.
Neuropharmacology 1997, 36, 1277.
R2
R3
Human (rat)
P2X7 pIC50
Human (rat) Clib
(mL/min/g liver)
c log Pc
a
Cl
Cl
4. Chessell, I. P.; Hatcher, J. P.; Bountra, C.; Michel, A. D.; Hughes, J. P.; Green, P.;
Egerton, J.; Murfin, M.; Richardson, J.; Peck, W. L.; Grahames, C. B. A.; Casula, M.
A.; Yiangou, Y.; Birch, R.; Anand, P.; Buell, G. N. Pain 2005, 114, 386.
5. Labasi, J. M.; Petrushova, N.; Donovan, C.; McCurdy, S.; Lira, P.; Payette, M. M.;
Brissette, W.; Wicks, J. R.; Audoly, L.; Gabel, C. A. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 6436.
6. Romagnoli, R.; Baraldi, P. G.; Cruz-Lopez, O.; Lopez-Cara, C.; Preti, D.; Borea, P.
A.; Gessi, S. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2008, 12, 647.
7. Chambers, L. J.; Stevens, A. J.; Moses, A. P.; Michel, A. D.; Walter, D. S.; Davies, D.
J.; Livermore, D. G.; Fonfria, E.; Demont, E. H.; Vimal, M.; Theobald, P. J.;
Beswick, P. J.; Gleave, R. J.; Roman, S. A.; Senger, S. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010.
N
H
17
Me
6.7 (6.6)
2.7 (6.7)
3.8
F
N
H
18
19
Et
6.3 (6.4)
7.2 (6.2)
—
4.3
4.1
F
Cl
N
H
Me
10 (18)
8. c log D7.4 (ACD) compound 1 = 3.4, compound 2 = 2.2.
9. Gordon, T. D.; Singh, J.; Hansen, P. E.; Morgan, B. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
1901.
a–c
See footnotes to Table 1 for details.
10. Ethidium bromide assay format described in patent application WO 2007
141267 A1. Briefly, the assay is carried out in HEK293 cells expressing
recombinant P2X7 receptors. ATP activation of the channel leads to an opening
of in cell wall and accumulation of ethidium bromide within the cell, levels of
which are determined using measurement of fluorescence. Inhibition of the
ATP response by a novel compound may be measured across a range of
when 2-methyl-3-chlorobenzyl is introduced (19) potency is main-
tained, indicating further evaluation of SAR may be warranted. The
R1 substituent seems unlikely to be a site of metabolism as its re-
moval has little effect on microsomal stability.
concentrations to generate an IC50
.
11. Clarke, S. E.; Jeffrey, P. Xenobiotica 2001, 31, 591.