1090 John E. T. Corrie et al.
kept overnight at room temperature and analyzed as above by HPLC,
which showed that the earlier eluted peak had almost totally
disappeared, while the slower peak was enhanced, consistent with
hydrolysis of the carboxylate ester 11. The solution was diluted to
70 mL, adjusted to pH 7.2 and quantified by UV spectroscopy
(583 lmol). The solution was diluted to 1 mS cm)1 conductivity and
desalted by anion-exchange chromatography, using a linear gradient
formed from 10 and 140 mM LiCl (each 1000 mL). Fractions contain-
ing the product were analyzed as above by HPLC (single peak, tR
1.8 min) and quantified by UV spectroscopy (452 lmol). The com-
bined fractions were concentrated under vacuum to ꢀ9.5 mL (bath
temperature <30ꢁC), diluted with EtOH-acetone (3:7 vol ⁄ vol; 95 mL)
and allowed to stand at 4ꢁC overnight. Further processing, as
described above for 4, gave pure 5 (197 lmol; 2.7 mL, 73 mM); 1H
NMR: d 8.27 (m, 2H, 3,5-H), 7.71 (m, 2H, 2,6-H), 5.44 (d, JH,P 8.7,
1H, CH), 3.42 (d, JH,P 10.9, 3H, Me); LRMS (negative ion ES): calcd
for (C9H8NO8P + H)): 290; found: 290.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General. 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Unityplus 500
instrument for solutions in D2O with an acetone internal reference.
J values are given in Hz. Analytical anion-exchange chromatography
was performed on a Whatman Partisphere SAX column (Cat. No.
4621-0505) with mobile phase flow rates of 1.5 mL min)1 and
detection at 254 nm. Preparative anion-exchange chromatography
was performed on
a column of DEAE-cellulose (2.5 · 40 cm).
Triethylammonium bicarbonate (TEAB) buffer was prepared by
bubbling CO2 into an ice-cold 1 M solution of redistilled triethylamine
in water until the pH stabilized at ꢀ7.4. When TEAB buffer was used,
pooled column fractions were evaporated at ꢀ1 mmHg and freed from
residual triethylamine by repeated evaporation from methanol. Lith-
ium chloride gradients for elution of preparative anion-exchange
columns were prepared from aqueous solutions of LiCl, without
adjustment of the ambient pH. Preparative reverse-phase chromatog-
raphy was performed on a 7.8 · 300 mm column packed with Waters
C18 Bulk Packing Material (Cat. No. 20594) at a flow rate of
2 mL min)1. Mobile phases for HPLC are specified at relevant
positions in the text. Aqueous solutions of 4 and 5 were quantified
using the spectrum of 4-nitromandelic acid in aqueous solution at pH
4-Nitrobenzyl methyl phosphate, 13. An aqueous solution of
4-nitrobenzyl phosphate 12 (see General) as its Et3NH+ salt
(0.33 mmol in 16.5 mL) was adjusted to pH 4.5 with 1 M HCl, cooled
in ice and stirred vigorously with an ethereal solution of diazomethane
(ꢀ0.3 M, total volume 40 mL), which was added in two aliquots. After
30 min, anion-exchange HPLC (mobile phase 20 mM Na phosphate,
pH 6.0-MeOH 100:13 [vol ⁄ vol]) of the aqueous phase indicated >90%
conversion of the starting material (tR 1.6 and 5.9 min for 13 and 12,
respectively). The aqueous layer was washed with Et2O and the pH
adjusted to 5.5. The solution was pumped onto the preparative reverse-
phase HPLC column, previously equilibrated in 10 mM sodium phos-
phate, pH 5.5, and the column was eluted with the same buffer for
ꢀ1.5 h. The mobile phase was changed to water for 1.5 h and then to
H2O-MeCN (3:2 vol ⁄ vol) for 1.5 h to elute the product. Fractions
containing 13 were concentrated under vacuum to remove MeCN,
adjusted to pH 7.2 and applied to the preparative DEAE-cellulose
column, that was eluted with a linear gradient formed from 10 and
150 mM TEAB (each 1000 mL). Fractions containing the product were
)1
7, kmax = 285 nm (e = 10 100 M cm)1) as the reference chromo-
phore. 4-Nitrobenzyl phosphate 12 was prepared from 4-nitrobenzyl
alcohol via its di-t-butyl ester and subsequent trifluoroacetic acid
treatment, as described for synthesis of other phosphates (1). Its 1H
NMR spectrum was comparable to published data (4,5). 1-(2-
Nitrophenyl)ethyl phosphate 18 was available from previous work (6).
a-Carboxy-4-nitrobenzyl phosphate, 4. A solution of ethyl a-diazo-4-
nitrophenylacetate 10 (0.235 g, 1 mmol) in anhydrous dioxan (20 mL)
was treated with concentrated phosphoric acid (2.0 mL) and the
solution was kept in the dark at room temperature for 4.5 days. The
solution was diluted with water (140 mL), adjusted to pH 5.5 with 1 M
NaOH and extracted with ether (3 · 75 mL). The aqueous solution
was lyophilized to about half its volume and loaded onto the
preparative reverse-phase HPLC column that had been equilibrated
in 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5 and the column was eluted with the
same buffer for ca 1.5 h. The mobile phase was changed to water for
2 h, then to a mixture of water-acetonitrile (9:1 vol ⁄ vol). The fractions
eluted in the latter solvent were analyzed by anion-exchange HPLC
(mobile phase 100 mM Na phosphate, pH 6-MeOH [100:13 vol ⁄ vol])
and those containing the ester 11 (tR 2.6 min) were concentrated under
reduced pressure to remove acetonitrile and adjusted to pH 13 with
1 M KOH. The solution was left overnight at room temperature and
adjusted to pH 7.2 by dropwise addition of 1 M HCl to the rapidly
stirred solution. The acid was added carefully to avoid local regions of
low pH that could have promoted decarboxylation. Analysis of the
solution by anion-exchange HPLC as above showed a single peak
corresponding to 4 (tR 4.7 min). The solution was diluted with water to
1 mS cm)1 conductivity and desalted by anion-exchange chromatog-
raphy using a linear gradient formed from 10 and 200 mM LiCl (each
1000 mL). Fractions containing the product were analyzed by HPLC
(as above), quantified by UV spectroscopy (369 lmol) and concen-
trated under vacuum to a volume of ꢀ8 mL, keeping the bath
temperature below 30ꢁC. This solution was diluted with EtOH-acetone
(3:7 vol ⁄ vol; 80 mL) and allowed to stand at 4ꢁC overnight. The fine
precipitate was collected by centrifugation (1000 g) and the pellet was
washed by resuspension in ice-cold EtOH-acetone (3:7 vol ⁄ vol; 65 mL)
and further centrifugation. After decanting the supernatant, the pellet
was dried under vacuum and dissolved in water (7.0 mL). The
concentration of 4, determined by UV spectroscopy, was 51.2 mM
(36% yield); 1H NMR: d 8.25 (m, 2H, 3,5-H), 7.72 (m, 2H, 2,6-H), 5.44
(d, JH,P 9.0, 1H, CH); LRMS (negative ion ES): calcd for
(C8H5NO8P + H + Li)): 282; found: 282.
)1
quantified by UV analysis at 280 nm (e = 10100 M cm)1). The
solution of 13 (227 lmol) was evaporated in vacuo, re-evaporated three
times from methanol and the residue was dissolved in water (20 mL).
The pH was adjusted to 7.0 and the solution was freeze-dried, then
redissolved in a small volume of water and converted to the sodium salt
(Dowex 50, Na form). The material was concentrated and stored at
)20ꢁC (3 mL, 75 mM); 1H NMR: d 8.25–8.27 (m, 2H, 3,5-H), 7.64–7.66
(m, 2H, 2,6-H), 5.04 (d, 2H, JH,P 7.9, CH2), 3.55 (d, 3H, JH,P 10.8, OMe);
LRMS (negative ion ES): calcd for C8H9NO6P): 246; found: 246.
Time-resolved UV–visible measurements. Absorption transients at
406 nm were triggered by a 30 ns, 308 nm pulse from a LambdaPhysik
LPX105 XeCl excimer laser directed into
a quartz cell with
10 · 10 mm path lengths, that was located in a thermostatted (20ꢁC)
sample holder positioned in a Luzchem LFP-111 transient recorder
(Luzchem Research, Quebec, Canada). Solutions contained the rele-
vant compound (0.5 mM) in 25 mM MOPS (pH 7.0) with 150 mM
NaCl. Data were collected using the Luzchem software and analyzed
in Microsoft ExcelTM. Typically, data from four repeat traces were
averaged before analysis.
Infrared spectroscopic measurements. Infrared difference spectra of
photolysis were recorded as described previously (1), in buffer made by
adjusting a 200 mM aqueous solution of MOPS with 3 M NaOH to pH
7. Samples in [18O]water were prepared by evaporation of the test
compound and buffer (both in H2O solution) on one of the CaF2
IR cell windows and reconstituting the dried spots in isotopic water.
Quantitative and isotopic measurements of inorganic phosphate. A
solution of 4 (0.91 mM) in 20 mM PIPES buffer, pH 7.0 was irradiated
for 45 s (Rayonet RPR-100 photochemical reactor; 16 · 350 nm
lamps) and the irradiated solution and nonirradiated control were
analyzed by anion-exchange HPLC as described above. The extent of
photolysis, determined by comparison of peak heights in the control
and irradiated solutions, was 52%. The control and irradiated
solutions were also assayed for inorganic phosphate, using the
fluorogenic assay based on the coumarin-labeled phosphate binding
protein described elsewhere (7,8). The measured concentrations of
inorganic phosphate in the control and irradiated samples were 0.02
and 0.46 mM, respectively, i.e. net phosphate in the irradiated sample
was 0.44 mM. As the concentration of 4 converted by photolysis was
0.47 mM, this corresponds to an inorganic phosphate yield of ꢀ94%.
a-Carboxy-4-nitrobenzyl methyl phosphate, 5. An aqueous solution
of 4 (619 lmol; 24 mL) was adjusted to pH 4.5 with 1 M HCl, cooled in
ice and stirred vigorously with an ethereal solution of diazomethane
(42.5 mL, ꢀ400 mM). After 30 min the diazomethane was completely
consumed, and anion-exchange HPLC analysis of the aqueous layer
(mobile phase 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6-MeOH [100:13
vol ⁄ vol]) gave two peaks, tR 1.2 and 1.8 min. The starting material 4
had tR 5.4 min in this mobile phase. The ether layer was separated and
washed with water (2 · 5 mL) and the aqueous layers were combined
(ꢀ35 mL) and adjusted to pH 13 with 1 M KOH. The solution was