catalyst Ph-SBA-15-PPh3-Pd was collected, washed with water,
ethanol and dichloromethane, then dried in a vacuum and
reused.
a D/Max-2400 diffractometer using Cu-Ka-ray radiation (l =
1.5405 A) operating at 40 kV and 100 mA. The scanning electron
˚
microscopy (SEM) images were obtained using a JSM-5600LV
microscope and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with
a Tecnai 20 microscope. The amount of Pd was obtained by
inductively coupled plasma (ICP) atomic emission spectrometry
(Optima 2000 DV). 1H, 13C, and 31P NMR spectra were recorded
in CDCl3 or ethyl acetate solution on a Varian Inova-400
Three-phase test
Silica gel supported aryl bromide was prepared according
to the literature procedure.7d A solution of 3-aminopropyl
triethoxysilane (5.1 mL, 22.0 mmol) in dry THF (10 mL) was
added dropwise to a solution of 4-bromobenzoyl chloride (4.83
g, 22.0 mmol) and triethyl amine (3.2 mL, 22.0 mmol) in
dry THF (50 mL) at -15 ◦C under nitrogen atmosphere. The
resulting mixture was warmed to room temperature, and stirred
for 2 h. Then the solid was removed via filtration and the solvent
was removed under vacuum at room temperature, giving 8.5 g of
the desired product, 4-bromobenzamide 3-propyltriethoxysilane
as a beige solid.
1
spectrometer (400 MHz for H, 100 MHz for 13C, 161 MHz
for 31P). The chemical shifts are reported in ppm downfield (d)
from Me4Si. High resolution mass spectra were recorded on a Q-
TOF mass spectrometry (Micromass, England) equipped with
Z-spray ionization source.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation
of China (20603005) for financial support. This work was
partly supported by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and
Innovative Research Teams in Universities (IRT0711).
A mixture of 4-bromobenzamide 3-propyltriethoxysilane (8.5
g, 21.9 mmol) thus obtained and pyridine (2.3 mL, 29.4 mmol)
was added dropwise to a suspension of silica (2.0 g) in dry toluene
(50 mL) under nitrogen atmosphere. The resulting mixture was
refluxed for 24 h. And then the suspension was filtered and
Soxhlet extracted with dichloromethane for 24 h. The resulting
solid was dried under vacuum at room temperature, giving 2.4 g
of white powder, and the content of aryl bromide was 1.64 mmol
g-1 determined by elemental analysis.
A mixture of 4-bromoacetophenone (0.25 mmol), phenyl-
boronic acid (0.38 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), K3PO4·3H2O (0.38 mmol,
1.5 equiv), silica gel supported aryl bromide (192 mg), catalyst
Ph-SBA-15-PPh3-Pd (0.8 mol% Pd), and carbon dioxide (15◦g)
in a 25 mL stainless steel pressure vessel was treated at 90 C
for 48 h. And then the mixture was allowed to cool to room
temperature. 15 mL of ethyl acetate was added into the vessel to
dissolve the coupling product, 4-phenylacetophenone, derived
from the soluble 4-bromoacetophenone substrate. The resulting
mixture was filtered, and the filtrate was evaporated to remove
solvent under reduced pressure. Pure 4-phenylacetophenone was
obtained in 74% isolated yield by a chromatography on silica gel
column [petroleum ether (60–90 ◦C)/ethyl acetate = 20 : 1]. The
separated solid was washed with ethanol, and further extracted
with dichloromethane, and was then hydrolyzed with 2 M KOH
in ethanol–water (1.68 g, 10 mL of EtOH, 5 mL of H2O) at 90 ◦C
for 3 days. The resulting solution was neutralized with aqueous
HCl (10 wt%), extracted with dichloromethane followed by ethyl
acetate, concentrated, and the resulting mixture was analyzed by
1H NMR.
Notes and references
1 For recent reviews on Suzuki cross-coupling reactions, see: (a) H.
Doucet, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2008, 2013; (b) A. Suzuki, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 38, 4759; (c) A. Suzuki, Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser.
B, Phys. Biol. Sci., 2004, 80, 359; (d) S. Kotha, K. Lahiri and D.
Kashinath, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 9633; (e) N. Miyaura, Top. Curr.
Chem., 2002, 219, 11.
2 Suzuki reaction was carried out in water. For recent reviews, see:
(a) A. Chanda and V. V. Fokin, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 725; (b) F.
Alonso, I. P. Beletskaya and M. Yus, Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 3047 For
selected recent references, see: (c) D. Saha, K. Chattopadhyay and B.
C. Ranu, Tetrahedron Lett., 2009, 50, 1003; (d) M. J. Jin, A. Taher,
H. J. Kang, M. Choi and R. Ryoo, Green Chem., 2009, 11, 309; (e) B.
Ine´s, R. SanMartin, M. J. Moure and E. Dom´ınguez, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2009, 351, 2124; (f) H. Tu¨rkmen, R. Can and B. C¸ etinkaya,
Dalton Trans., 2009, 7039; (g) B. Karimi and P. F. Akhavan, Chem.
Commun., 2009, 3750; (h) J. F. Wei, J. Jiao, J. J. Feng, J. Lv, X. R.
Zhang, X. Y. Shi and Z. G. Chen, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74, 6283; (i) Y.
Uozumi, Y. Matsuura, T. Arakawa and Y. M. A. Yamada, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2708; (j) J. Han, Y. Liu and R. Guo, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 2060; (k) B. H. Lipshutz and A. R. Abela, Org.
Lett., 2008, 10, 5329; (l) J. Zhang, W. Zhang, Y. Wang and M. Zhang,
Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 2065; (m) G. W. Wei, W. Q. Zhang, F.
Wen, Y. Wang and M. C. Zhang, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2008, 112, 10827;
(n) S. Q. Bai and T. S. A. Hor, Chem. Commun., 2008, 3172; (o) D.
H. Lee, Y. H. Lee, D. I. Kim, Y. Kim, W. T. Lim, J. M. Harrowfield,
P. Th u´ery, M. J. Jin, Y. C. Park and I. M. Lee, Tetrahedron, 2008,
64, 7178; (p) B. H. Lipshutz, T. B. Petersen and A. R. Abela, Org.
Lett., 2008, 10, 1333; (q) C. Fleckenstein, S. Roy, S. Leutha¨uber and
H. Plenio, Chem. Commun., 2007, 2870.
3 Suzuki reaction was carried out in ionic liquid. (a) For a review, see
ref. 2b; See also; (b) M. Lombardo, M. Chiarucci and C. Trombini,
Green Chem., 2009, 11, 574; (c) J. Durand, E. Teuma, F. Malbosc, Y.
Kihn and M. Go´mez, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 273; (d) F. Ferna´ndez,
B. Cordero, J. Durand, G. Muller, F. Malbosc, Y. Kihn, E. Teuma
and M. Go´mez, Dalton Trans., 2007, 5572.
4 Suzuki reaction was carried out in supercritical carbon dioxide.
(a) For a review, see ref. 2b; See also; (b) G. A. Leeke, R. C. D.
Santos, B. Al-Duri, J. P. K. Seville, C. J. Smith, C. K. Y. Lee, A. B.
Holmes and I. F. McConvey, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2007, 11, 144
and references therein.
5 Suzuki reaction was carried out under solvent-free conditions. See:
(a) P. Nun, J. Martinez and F. Lamaty, Synlett, 2009, 1761; (b) W.
Chang, J. Shin, Y. Oh and B. J. Ahn, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2008, 14,
423; (c) G. W. Kabalka, L. Wang, R. M. Pagni, C. M. Hair and V.
Namboodiri, Synthesis, 2003, 217.
General characterization
UV-vis absorption spectrum was performed on the HP 8453
ultraviolet and visible spectrophotometry. N2 physical adsorp-
tion was carried out on a Micrometrics ASAP2020 volumetric
adsorption analyzer (before the measurements, samples were
degassed at 433 k for 6 h). The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) surface area was evaluated from data in the relative
pressure range from 0.05 to 0.25. The total pore volume of
each sample was estimated from the amount adsorbed at the
highest P/P0 (above 0.99). Pore diameters were determined from
the adsorption branch using Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH)
method. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured on
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Green Chem., 2010, 12, 1758–1766 | 1765
©