Please do not adjust margins
MedChemComm
Page 7 of 9
DOI: 10.1039/C6MD00360E
Journal Name
ARTICLE
6.
7.
R. Cao, Q. Chen, X. Hou, H. Chen, H. Guan, Y. Ma, W. Peng
and A. Xu, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2004, 12, 4613-4623.
Q. Chen, R. H. Chao, H. S. Chen, X. R. Hou, H. F. Yan, S. F.
Anti-angiogenic activity in vivo of bivalent β-carbolines
The most potent compound 8z was selected to evaluate the
angiogenetic activity by CAM assay. The inhibitory effects of
Zhou, W. L. Peng and A. L. Xu, Int. J. Cancer, 2005, 114
,
compound 8z on angiogenesis of CAM are shown in Fig.4A
.
675-682.
The anti-angiogenetic activities of compounds 8z was
semiquantitatively analyzed using Graph Pad Prism 5.0 (shown
in Fig.4B). The result showed that compound 8z (p < 0.05)
could inhibit the angiogenesis of CAM. The anti-angiogenetic
activity of compound 8z was comparable to Endostar in vivo
CAM assay at the same dose (30 μM).
8.
M. Zhao, L. R. Bi, W. Wang, C. Wang, M. Baudy-Floc'h, J. F.
Ju and S. Q. Peng, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2006, 14, 6998-
7010.
Q. F. Wu, R. H. Cao, M. X. Feng, X. D. Guan, C. M. Ma, J. B.
Liu, H. C. Song and W. L. Peng, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2009,
44, 533-540.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Z. Y. Chen, R. H. Cao, B. X. Shi, W. Yi, L. A. Yu, H. C. Song, Z.
H. Ren and W. L. Peng, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2010, 20
,
3876-3879.
Conclusions
M. L. Yang, P. C. Kuo, T. L. Hwang, W. F. Chiou, K. Qian, C.
Y. Lai, K. H. Lee and T. S. Wu, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2011,
19, 1674-1682.
R. H. Cao, W. X. Fan, L. Guo, Q. Ma, G. X. Zhang, J. R. Li, X.
M. Chen, Z. H. Ren and L. Q. Qiu, Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2013,
60, 135-143.
In this work, a series of novel alkyl diamine linked bivalent β-
carbolines with linkers of different lengths and incorporating
various substituents into position-1 and 9 was synthesized and
evaluated as angiogenesis inhibitors. Some bivalent β-
carbolines exhibited significant anti-proliferative effects
against EA.HY926 cell lines, and compound 8z was found to be
the most potent inhibitory agent with IC50 value of 1.10 μM
against EA.HY926 cell lines. Structure-activity relationships
analysis revealed that (1) the introduction substituent into
position-9 of β-carboline nucleus facilitated their anti-
proliferative effects, and the short alkyl substituent was the
optimal group giving rise to potent anti-proliferative agents,
13.
14.
G. Duportail, Journal, 1981, 3, 188-193.
Z. K. Taira, S.; Dohara, C.; Ishida, S.; Matsumoto, M.;
Sakiya, Y. , Jpn. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, 1997, 43, 9.
A. M. E. Sobhani, S. A.;Mahmoudian, M. , J. Pharm.
15.
16.
Pharmaceut. Sci., 2002, 5, 19-23.
R. H. Cao, W. L. Peng, H. S. Chen, Y. Ma, X. D. Liu, X. R.
Hou, H. J. Guan and A. L. Xu, Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun., 2005, 338, 1557-1563.
(2) the length of the spacer affected anti-proliferative effects 17.
and five methylene units might be more favorable. Preliminary
investigations on mechanisms of action revealed that
Y. Song, J. Wang, S. F. Teng, D. Kesuma, Y. Deng, J. Duan, J.
H. Wang, R. Z. Qi and M. M. Sim, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2002, 12, 1129-1132.
18.
Y. Song, D. Kesuma, J. Wang, Y. Deng, J. Duan, J. H. Wang
compound 8z could dramatically inhibit EA.HY926 cells
and R. Z. Qi, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2004, 317
,
migration and tube formation in a dose-dependent manner. In
128-132.
addition, compound 8z exhibited significant angiogenesis
19.
Y. Li, F. Liang, W. Jiang, F. Yu, R. Cao, Q. Ma, X. Dai, J.
Jiang, Y. Wang and S. Si, Cancer Biol. Ther., 2007, 6, 1193-
1199.
J. I. Trujillo, M. J. Meyers, D. R. Anderson, S. Hegde, M. W.
Mahoney, W. F. Vernier, I. P. Buchler, K. K. Wu, S. Yang, S.
J. Hartmann and D. B. Reitz, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
2007, 17, 4657-4663.
inhibitory effects in CAM assay, and the anti-angiogenetic
potency was comparable with the reference drug Endostar.
These results indicated that bivalent β-carbolines represented
20.
a new class of angiogenesis inhibitors. Obviously, further
investigations to elucidate the pharmacological mechanisms in
finer detail and confirm the antitumor efficacy in animal
21.
22.
23.
J. Zhang, Y. Li, L. Guo, R. Cao, P. Zhao, W. Jiang, Q. Ma, H.
Yi, Z. Li, J. Jiang, J. Wu, Y. Wang and S. Si, Cancer Biol.
Ther., 2009, 8, 2374-2383.
P. A. Barsanti, W. Wang, Z. J. Ni, D. Duhl, N. Brammeier, E.
Martin, D. Bussiere and A. O. Walter, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett., 2010, 20, 157-160.
A. C. Castro, L. C. Dang, F. Soucy, L. Grenier, H.
Mazdiyasni, M. Hottelet, L. Parent, C. Pien, V. Palombella
and J. Adams, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2003, 13, 2419-
2422.
models of this class of compounds are needed.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (21342010) and the Guangdong Natural
Science Foundation (s2013010012138 and 2016A030313349)
and Xinjiang Huashidan Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
24.
25.
26.
N. Capelle, J. Barbet, P. Dessen, S. Blanquet, B. P. Roques
and J. B. Le Pecq, Biochemistry, 1979, 18, 3354-3362.
B. Gaugain, J. Barbet, N. Capelle, B. P. Roques and J. B. Le
Pecq, Biochemistry, 1978, 17, 5078-5088.
J. B. Chaires, F. Leng, T. Przewloka, I. Fokt, Y. H. Ling, R.
Perez-Soler and W. Priebe, J. Med. Chem., 1997, 40, 261-
266.
G. G. Hu, X. Shui, F. Leng, W. Priebe, J. B. Chaires and L. D.
Williams, Biochemistry, 1997, 36, 5940-5946.
D. R. Phillips, R. T. Brownlee, J. A. Reiss and P. A.
Scourides, Invest. New drugs, 1992, 10, 79-88.
Notes and references
1.
2.
3.
M. E. Maragoudakis, Gen. pharmacol., 2000, 35, 225-226.
N. Ferrara and R. S. Kerbel, Nature, 2005, 438, 967-974.
H. Buning and U. T. Hacker, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 2016,
917, 261-285.
4.
5.
R. H. Cao, W. L. Peng, Z. H. Wang and A. L. Xu, Curr. Med.
Chem. 2007, 14, 479-500.
J. Ishida, H. K. Wang, K. F. Bastow, C. Q. Hu and K. H. Lee,
27.
28.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1999, 9, 3319-3324.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 7
Please do not adjust margins