Table 1. Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties of Compounds 9-16 in Solutions and in Thin Films
d
compd λonset, λmax abs.a [nm] (logε) λmax emis.b [nm] λmax abs.c [nm] λmax emis.c [nm] Ered [V] EHOMO [eV] ELUMO [eV] Eg(opt) [eV]
9
450, 403 (4.57)
460, 413 (4.62)
429, 393 (4.69)
466, 404 (4.53)
475, 408 (4.53)
433, 403 (4.53)
488, 413 (4.48)
500, 410 (4.52)
469
484
457
510
517
438
545
553
408
421
398
410
416
405
413
412
488
508
476
520
525
495
523
571
-1.27
-1.11
-1.05
-1.00
-0.88
-0.89
-0.73
-0.63
-6.00
-6.11
-6.38
-6.06
-6.22
-6.48
-6.29
-6.36
-3.16
-3.32
-3.38
-3.43
-3.55
-3.54
-3.70
-3.80
2.84
2.79
3.00
2.73
2.67
2.94
2.59
2.56
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
a λonset (left) and λmax (right) in dichloromethane solution (5 × 10-5 M). b In dichloromethane solution (5 × 10-5 M). c In thin films. d Reference electrode:
Ag/AgCl. Onsets in dichloromethane solution (1 × 10-3 M).
photophysical data in solutions and in thin films are sum-
marized in Table 1. Figure S1 (Supporting Information)
illustrates the absorption features of these eight imides in
CH2Cl2 solutions and in thin films. As shown in Figure S1,
For 9, 11, 12, and 15 with an octyl group in their structures,
relative to 9, the onset of the absorption for 11 blue-shifted
from 450 to 429 nm, and absorption maximum λmax also blue-
shifted almost 10 nm, which was due to the introduction of
the ethoxycarbonyl group; while for 12 and 15, their
absorption maximum λmax exhibited the successive red-shift,
which was in agreement with the increase of the electron-
withdrawing ability thus effecting increase of the conjugation
length. Compared to 9, the onset and absorption maximum
λmax of the pentafluorophenyl-substituted derivative 10
showed 10 nm red-shift because the pentafluorophenyl group
is located at the node of the molecule which has little
contribution to the photophysical properties of the com-
pounds. For the pentafluorophenyl-substituted derivatives,
they have the same wavelength-shift tendency with the octyl-
substituted derivatives as shown in Table 1.12 Compared to
the solution state, the absorption wavelengths of all the
compounds have a little red-shift in the thin film as shown
in Table 1 and Figure S1 (Supporting Information), because
of the aggregation of the compounds in the solid state.
The fluorescence spectra of these compounds were also
investigated as shown in Figure S2 (Supporting Information).
Compared to 9, the emission maximum λmax exhibited blue-
shift from 469 to 457 nm for 11; however for 12 and 15,
they exhibited the successive red-shift from 469 to 510 nm
and 545 nm; while for 10, it changed a little, the emission
maximum λmax red-shifted from 469 to 484 nm. The results
are consistent with the wavelength-shift tendency of their
absorption spectra and can be explained with the same
reasons mentioned above.
Figure 1. CV curves of the double-site modified fluoranthene
derivatives in CH2Cl2.
the absorption of 9 revealed a strong absorption band at 304
nm, a weaker one at 338 nm and a broad one at 403 nm.
(5) (a) Katz, H. E.; Lovinger, A. J.; Johnson, J.; Kloc, C.; Siegrist, T.;
Li, W.; Lin, Y.-Y.; Dodabalapur, A. Nature 2000, 404, 478–481. (b) Yan,
H.; Chen, Z. H.; Zheng, Y.; Newman, C.; Quinn, J. R.; Do¨tz, F.; Kastler,
M.; Facchetti, A. Nature 2009, 457, 679–687. (c) Jones, B. A.; Ahrens,
M. J.; Yoon, M. H.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J.; Wasielewski, M. R. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6363–6366. (d) Jones, B. A.; Facchetti, A.;
Wasielewski, M. R.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15259–
15278. (e) Wen, Y. G.; Liu, Y. L.; Di, C. A.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X. N.; Guo,
Y. L.; Zheng, J.; Wu, W. P.; Ye, S. H.; Yu, G. AdV. Mater. 2009, 21, 1631–
1635.
All these eight imides were investigated by cyclic
voltammetry in CH2Cl2. Two reduction bands were
observed for these compounds. The first reduction band
can be attributed to the monoanion and the second band
can be attributed to dianion formation of the conjugated
fluoranthene-fused imide chromophore.13 From the CV
curve, the reduction band shifted gradually by introducing
(6) (a) Facchetti, A.; Deng, Y.; Wang, A.; Koide, Y.; Sirringhaus, H.;
Marks, T. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 4547–4551. (b) Handa, S.;
Miyazaki, E.; Takimiya, K.; Kunugi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
11684–11685. (c) Gao, X. K.; Di, C. A.; Hu, Y. B.; Yang, X. D.; Fan,
H. Y.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Y. Q.; Li, H. X.; Zhu, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 3697–3699.
(7) Yan, Q. F.; Zhou, Y.; Ni, B. B.; Ma, Y. G.; Wang, J.; Pei, J.; Cao,
Y. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5328–5339.
(10) Rieke, L. I.; Milligan, S. N.; Rieke, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48,
2949–2953.
(8) Schmidt, R.; Oh, J. H.; Sun, Y.-S.; Deppisch, M.; Krause, A.-M.;
Radacki, K.; Braunschweig, H.; Ko¨nemann, M.; Erk, P.; Bao, Z. N.;
Wu¨rthner, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6215–6228.
(11) Bhandari, S.; Ray, S. Synth. Commun. 1998, 28, 765–771.
(12) Wilson, J. N.; Bunz, U. H. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4124–
4125.
(9) Tesmer, M.; Vahrenkamp, H. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 1183–
1188.
(13) You, C. C.; Dobrawa, R.; Saha-Mo¨ller, C. R.; Wu¨rthner, F. Top.
Curr. Chem. 2005, 258, 39–82.
5524
Org. Lett., Vol. 12, No. 23, 2010