6596
B. Liu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 20 (2010) 6592–6596
Table 5
compound 14. It was suggested that the binding of this series
Rat pharmacokineticsa
of compounds can be better explained by the amide tautomer of
the 1,3,5-triazin-2-ol (the structure shown in Fig. 3). The carbonyl
oxygen and NH of the triazine ring form two hydrogen bonds with
the Lys101 backbone NH and carbonyl, respectively, which is con-
sistent with the SAR. The B ring of the biaryl moiety sits in the
pocket formed by Leu100, Leu234, and Trp229. The benzofuran
moiety of compound 14 sits between the lipophilic pocket formed
by Trp229, Tyr188, Tyr181, Phe227, and Val106. The ligand also
Parameter
14
17
Cmax
AUC (
t1/2 (h)
Vdss (L/kg)
Cl (L/h/kg)
F (%)
(
lM)
3.8
6.1
lM h)
12.5
1.45
0.35
0.31
38
15.6
1.40
0.32
0.27
44
a
PO dose: 4 mg/kg. IV dose: 2 mg/kg.
forms favorable
p p interaction with Tyr181 and Trp229. This pro-
À
posed binding mode is different from the binding mode of the
DATA class of NNRTIs,15 presumably due to the substituents on
the current 1,3,5-triazin-2-ol core which are bulkier than those
in the DATA series.
Trp229
Tyr188
In summary, a series of 4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazin-2-ol com-
pounds was discovered as novel NNRTIs, and the preliminary SAR
of this series of compounds was established. This study led to
the identification of inhibitors with single digit nanomolar potency
both in enzymatic and cellular assays. Preliminary in vivo rat PK
study showed that this class of compounds possesses favorable
PK properties suitable for oral administration. Molecular modeling
studies were employed to understand the binding mode between
these inhibitors and the wild-type HIV reverse transcriptase. The
current results indicate that this series of compounds could serve
as potential leads to further develop novel and potent NNRTIs.
Phe227
Tyr181
Leu234
Val106
Leu100
Val179
Lys103
Acknowledgments
O
H
N
N
N
O
We thank Mr. Brandon Campbell and Dr. Robert Schiksnis for
their analytical assistance.
N
NH
F
Lys101
References and notes
Figure 3. Proposed binding mode of compound 14 with wild-type RT.
1. De Clercq, E. Med. Chem. Res. 2004, 13, 439.
2. Balzarini, J. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 921.
evaluated (Table 4). Both compounds showed similar activity and
trends as Nevirapine (NVP) and Efavirenz (EFZ).
In a pharmacokinetic study (Table 5), both compounds 14 and
17 are well absorbed when administered orally in rats (4 mg/kg),
3. Sahlberg, C.; Zhou, X. Anti-Infect. Agents Med. Chem. 2008, 7, 101.
4. Zhou, Z.; Madrid, M.; Evanseck, J.; Madura, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17253.
5. Ren, J.; Stammers, D. K. Virus Res. 2008, 134, 157.
6. Andries, K.; Azijn, H.; Thielemans, T.; Ludovici, D.; Kukla, M.; Heeres, J.; Janssen,
P.; De Corte, B.; Vingerhoets, J.; Pauwels, R.; de Bethune, M. P. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 4680.
7. Ludovici, D. W.; Kavash, R. W.; Kukla, M. J.; Ho, C. Y.; Ye, H. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
Lett. 2001, 11, 2229.
8. Le Van, K.; Cauvin, C.; de Walque, S.; Georges, B.; Boland, S.; Martinelli, V.;
Demonté, D.; Durant, F.; Hevesi, L.; Van Lint, C. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 3636.
9. In this mechanism of action study, compound 1 showed the following EC50’s:
with a Cmax of 3.8 lM and 6.1 lM, respectively. Following intrave-
nous dosing (2 mg/kg), both compounds showed reasonable half-
life (ꢀ1.4 h), and the apparent bioavailability was determined to
be around 40% for both compounds.
A computational modeling study was carried out to understand
the possible binding mode of this series of compounds and interac-
tions with the reverse transcriptase. Briefly, the prediction of the
binding mode was performed with a pharmacophore search fol-
lowed by an energy minimization within the protein. The protein
structure was obtained from the Protein Brookhaven Database
(PDB code 1SUQ). A four point pharmacophore was defined based
on 1SUQ ligand, which contains three aromatic features and one
hydrogen bond donor interaction with Lys101 backbone carbonyl
group. The shape of the binding site is defined with 190 exclusive
volume points based on the 1SUQ protein structure. Ligand confor-
mations were generated with a systematic search. The binding
modes of the compounds were selected by visual inspection of
the poses.14 Figure 3 shows the predicted binding mode of
Fusion inhibition >25 lM; Integrase >1000 lM; Protease >100 lM.
10. Baindur, N.; Chadha, N.; Brandt, B.; Asgari, D.; Patch, R.; Schalk-HiHi, C.; Carver,
T.; Petrounia, I.; Baumann, C.; Ott, H.; Manthey, C.; Springer, B.; Player, M. J.
Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1717.
11. Liu, B.; Moffet, K.; Joseph, R.; Dorsey, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1779.
12. Kaval, N.; Van der Eycken, J.; Dehaen, W.; Strohmeier, G.; Kappe, C.; Van der
Eycken, E. J. Comb. Chem. 2003, 5, 560.
13. Compound 14 was also screened against other anti-HIV targets and showed the
following EC50’s: Fusion inhibition = 20
M.
lM; Integrase >100 lM; Protease >100
l
14. Pharmacophore generation and searching, generation of ligand conformation
and energy minimization were performed with MOEÒ (Chemical Computing
Group).
15. Das, K.; Clark, D., Jr.; Lewi, P.; Heeres, J.; De Jonge, M.; Koymans, L.; Vinkers, H.;
Daeyaert, F.; Ludovici, D.; Kukla, M.; De Corte, B.; Kavash, R.; Ho, C.; Ye, H.;
Lichtenstein, M.; Andries, K.; Pauwels, R.; De Bethune, M.; Boyer, P.; Clark, P.;
Hughes, S.; Janssen, P.; Arnold, E. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2550.