Righi et al.
JOCNote
these disappointing results, we still believed that hydro-
€
silanes in the presence of a strong Bronsted acid such as TFA
should be effective for our purposes.12 Indeed, when triethylsi-
lane (2.5 equiv) was added to a solution containing 3-methoxy-
N-phenylaniline (2a) (1.0 equiv) and N-(2,2-dimethoxy-
ethyl)acetamide (3a) (1.4 equiv) in CH2Cl/TFA (2:1), the
desired tertiary amine UCM765 (4a) was formed smoothly.13
In 2 h at room temperature, the reaction was complete and
the product 4a was isolated in 93% yield (Table 1, entry 1).
The same reaction conditions when applied to 3-bromo-N-(4-
fluorophenyl)aniline (2b) gave the alkylated product UCM924
(4b) in excellent yield (Table 1, entry 2). It is also worth noting
that debrominated side product was not detected by LC-MS
in the crude mixture, demonstrating that these reaction condi-
tions are mild and selective. A number of other diarylamines
having therapeutically relevant scaffolds (2c-f) were tested
with this new method (Table 1, entries 3-6). The biological
activity manifested by tricyclic, nitrogen containing heterocyc-
lic compounds makes them attractive substrates to test the
reaction. Thus, dibenzazepine 2c, dihydrodibenzazepine 2d,
carbazole 2e, and phenothiazine 2f were subjected to the above
reductive N-alkylation conditions, and the corresponding
N-alkylated products 4c-f were obtained in high yields
(85-95%). Notably, 2d reacted readily and in high yield under
these reaction conditions, while no reaction has been reported
under standard reductive amination conditions even with
aldehydes.10 In certain instances, the reductively alkylated
products could be directly crystallized in high purity following
aqueous workup. When the products were oils, chromato-
graphy was necessary to obtain analytically pure material. In
general, however, the crude products from these reductive
alkylations were sufficiently clean that a short filtration was
enough to have analytically pure product. We then explored
reductive N-alkylation reactions of N-(2,2-dimethoxyethyl)-
acetamide with different N-alkylanilines, as illustrated in
Table 1 (entries 7-11), including some partially saturated
bicyclic heterocycles such as indoline and tetrahydroquinoline
(entries 7 and 8); all reacted smoothly to generate the desired
products in good to excellent yields. It is noteworthy to observe
that 4-nitro-N-methylaniline (2j), underwent successful alkyla-
tion (95% yield), with no reduction of the nitro group, further
highlighting the remarkable chemoselective character of the
reducing system (Table 1, entry 10). Unfortunately, no reaction
occurred when N-isopropylaniline was used (Table 1, entry 11),
whereas an acceptable yield was obtained when the carbamate
was used as the amine partner (Table 2 entry 7). Having secured
access to a range of tertiary amines, attention was focused on
the application of the same conditions to primary anilines.
It was found that anilines bearing both electron-with-
drawing groups (nitro, ester, or cyano) and/or electron-
donating groups were alkylated smoothly in high yields
(Table 2) with functional groups such as NO2, CF3, CO2Me,
FIGURE 2. Possible approaches to unsymmetrically substituted
ethylenediamines.
Direct reductive amination of carbonyl compounds has
been widely utilized to prepare amines and offers compelling
advantages over other syntheses, including brevity, wide
commercial availability of substrates, generally mild reac-
tion conditions, high functional group tolerance, ease of
operation, and cost effectiveness. However, reductive ami-
nation of poorly reactive, electron-deficient arylamines is
known to be difficult. Recent work9 has shown the synthesis
of some ethylendiamines by reductive N-alkylation of sui-
table primary or secondary N-alkylanilines with commer-
cially available N-Boc glycinal, but there are no reports of
this protocol using diarylamines as the amine partner
(Figure 2, approach C). Indeed, our initial efforts to prepare
UCM765 (4a) by reacting the diarylamine 2a with the
commercially available N-Boc glycinal using NaBH(OAc)3
or NaCNBH3 were thwarted by insufficient imine/iminium
concentration and competing direct reduction of the carbo-
nyl group. Even with excess aldehyde, conversion of the
amine remained below 10%. The standard literature recom-
mendation for poorly nucleophilic amines is to add acetic
acid, along with a concomitant increase in the amounts of
carbonyl component and reducing agent.10 In the present
case, poor yields were still obtained with addition of AcOH,
although a trend toward increasing yield with increasing
quantities of acid was clear. Instead, the same protocol
applied to N-methylaniline (2i) provided the alkylated pro-
duct in modest yield (ca. 30%).
Decaborane11a and a polymethylhydrosiloxane (PMHS)/
TFA combination system11b have been recently used for the
successful one-pot reductive amination of benzaldehyde
dimethyl acetal with primary aromatic amines. Therefore,
we evaluated the possibility of extending these methodol-
ogies to diarylamine 2a with the functionalized acetal N-(2,2-
dimethoxyethyl)acetamide (3a).
While using decaborane no reaction occurred, using
PMHS and TFA in CH2Cl2 at room temperature, the
desired product was obtained in very poor yields. Despite
(9) (a) Chambers, L. J.; Collis, K. L; Dean, D. K.; Munoz-Muriedas, J.;
Steadman, J. G. A.; Walter, D. S. WO 2009053459 A1, 2009. (b) Cho, Y. L.;
Song, H, Y.; Lee, D. Y.; Baek, S. Y.; Chae, S. E.; Jo, S. H.; Kim, Y. O.; Lee,
H. S.; Park, J. H.; Park, T. K.; Woo, S. H.; Kim, Y. Z. WO 2008140220 A1,
2008. (c) Chen, X.; Cioffi, C. L.; Dinn, S. R.; Escribano, A. M.; Fernandez,
M. C.; Fields, T.; Herr, R. J.; Mantlo, N. B.; De la Nava, E. M. M.; Mateo-
Herranz, A. I.; Parthasarathy, S.; Wang, X. WO 2006002342 A1, Jan 5, 2006.
(d) Halim, M.; Tremblay, M. S.; Jockusch, S.; Turro, N. J.; Sames, D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 7704–7705. (e) Hamilton, A.; Buckner, F.; Glenn, M.;
Van Voorhis, W. WO 2006102159 A2, 2006.
(12) For reviews on reductions using hydrosilanes, see: (a) Kursanov,
D. N.; Parnes, Z. N.; Loim, N. M. Synthesis 1974, 633. (b) Nagai, P. Org.
Prep. Proc. Int. 1980, 12, 13. (c) Guizzetti, S.; Benaglia, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2010, 5529–5541.
(13) For other use of the triethylsilane in reducing reactions, see: (a)
ꢀ
Dube, D.; Scholte, A. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2295–2298. (b) Lee,
(10) (a) Abdel-Magid, A. F.; Carson, K. G.; Harris, B. D.; Maryanoff,
C. A.; Shah, R. D. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 3849–3862. (b) Abdel-Magid,
A. F.; Mehrman, S. J. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2006, 10, 971–1031.
(11) (a) Park, E. S.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, S. J.; Yoon, C. M. Synth. Commun.
2003, 33, 3387–3396. (b) Patel, J P.; Li, A.; Dong, H.; Korlipara, V. L.;
Mulvihill, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 5975–5977.
O.-Y.; Law, K.-L.; Ho, C.-Y.; Yang, D. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8829–8837.
(c) Mizuta, T.; Sakaguchi, S.; Ishii, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 2195–2199. (d)
Lucarini, S.; Bedini, A.; Spadoni, G.; Piersanti, G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008,
6, 147–150. For an elegant study demonstrating that organosilanes are
weaker hydride donors, see: Richter, D.; Mayr, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 1958–1961.
J. Org. Chem. Vol. 76, No. 2, 2011 705