ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
LETTER
one of the boronate hydroxyl group and the backbone nitrogen
atoms of Ser49 and Thr413 (which forms an “oxyanion hole”), in
a manner analogous to that observed between the nitrocefin
acyl-enzyme carbonyl oxygen and the oxyanion hole (Figure 2a).
The C-R group of 10 is positioned next to that of Leu349,
possibly explaining why analogues 12-17 with substituents
bulkier than a methyl group are inactive. The side chain amides
of nitrocefin and 10 are positioned to make similar hydrogen-
bonding interactions to the Asn300 side chain and Thr413
backbone carbonyl. Although the overall structures for the
complexes with nitrocefin and 10 are very similar, in the case
of 10 the side chain of Tyr147 is rotated to enable an apparent π-
stacking interaction with the phenyl ring of 10.
Table 1. Activity of Computationally Designed Second-
(18-27) and Third-Generation (28-30) Boronic Acids
against R39a
The structural data suggest that 10 reacts with R39 to form a
reasonable mimic of an intermediate complex; hence, it was
selected as a starting point for further optimization, using the
inhibitor design software SPROUT.13,14 In this strategy, the
protein is first examined for potential ligand interaction sites.
Fragments are then “added” to the lead structure. A scoring
system based on predicted binding affinity, structural complexity,
and synthetic accessibility guides the “identification” of poten-
tially improved inhibitors (Supporting Information Figure S2).
Initial computational analysis of 10 and nitrocefin R39 com-
plexes reveals two regions of relatively high hydrophobicity
which we considered could be utilized for structural modifica-
tion. One region (A) is adjacent to the 4- and 5-positions of the
phenyl ring of 10, and the other (B) is a relatively large area of
space formed by Trp139, Asp142, Tyr147, Arg351, and Met414,
which is occupied by the nitrocefin C-7 side chain (Figure 2).
A series of second-generation boronic acid inhibitors 18-27
(Table 1) was identified by computationally modifying 10 using a
virtual fragment library of mainly hydrophobic elements. Boronic
acids 18-27 were then prepared to explore structure-activity
relationships in regions A and B, respectively.
The synthesis of the boronic acids 18-27 was adapted from
the strategy of Matteson et al.,15 starting from boronate esters
formed from (þ)- or (-)-pinanediol (Scheme 1). Key steps are
the stereoselective chain homologation using dichloromethyl-
lithium and nucleophilic displacement of chloride with bistri-
methylsilylamide. Deprotection of the N-R-acetyl boronate ester
was achieved via the trifluoroborate intermediate, formed by
reaction of the boronate esters with KHF2, followed by acid
hydrolysis.16,17
a Percentage residual activities were determined in triplicate at 100 μM.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Boronic Acid Inhibitorsa
The computationally designed compounds 18-24, 26, and
27 (IC50 values 0.27-14 μM) are more active against R39 than
10 (IC50 = 33 μM) (Table 1). The benzothiazole ring in 19 (IC50
= 2.2 μM) is predicted to fit snugly within the smaller region A.
Consistent with this proposal, an analogue 18, with a larger
naphthyl ring, was less active (IC50 = 14 μM). The presence of
bulky groups at the ortho-position generally improves potency as
demonstrated by the results for 20-22 (SPROUT score =
-7.04, -7.27, -7.37, respectively; observed IC50 = 1.80, 1.31,
and 0.27 μM, respectively). An exception is the ortho-substituted
isopropyl derivative 25. The most potent compounds in this
series are compounds 22 and 23, with IC50 values of 0.27 and
0.50 μM, respectively.
a Conditions: (a) (-)-pinanediol, THF, RT, 95%; (b) lithium diiso-
propylamide, CH2Cl2, ZnCl2, THF, -78 ꢀC to rt, 50-80%; (c)
LiN(TMS)2, THF, -78 ꢀC to rt, 60-80%; (d) HCl/Et2O, 95%; (e)
R2COCl, 4-dimethylaminopyridine, Et3N, THF, DMF, 0 ꢀC to rt,
50-90%; (f) R2CO2H, (2-(7-aza-1H-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3-tetra-
methyluronium hexafluorophosphate), 1-hydroxybenzotriazole, N-methyl-
morpholine, THF, DMF, 0ꢀC to rt, 50-90%; (g) KHF2, MeOH, 70-90%;
(h) chlorotrimethylsilane, MeCN, H2O, 60-90%.
A crystal structure was then obtained with 20 complexed to
R39 (PDB ID 2XK1, Figure 3, Supporting Information Figure
S1b). The mode of binding of the boronic acid with Ser49 is very
similar to that of 10 (Figure 2b), with all apparent hydrogen
bonds being conserved. The structure implies that the increased
potencies of the S-enantiomers (10, 20, and 23) compared to the
R-enantiomers (11, 27, and 26) are due to better fit of the C-R
group within a small pocket adjacent to region A. Interestingly,
and as predicted from the modeling studies, the presence of the
bulkier side chain of 20 (compared to 10) causes it to adopt a
different conformation, wherein the benzyl group occupies a
221
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ml100260x |ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 219–223