796
P. Bandyopadhyay et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 21 (2011) 794–797
Table 2
Oviposition response of Aedes albopictus to Aryl hydrazono esters
Code
Aryl hydrazono estes
No. of eggs laid in different treatments,
(mean + SE)
P value* (significance) OAI value
Control
10 ppm
AHE-1
AHE-2
AHE-3
AHE-4
AHE-5
AHE-6
AHE-7
AHE-8
AHE-9
Ethyl 2-(2-phenylhydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Ethyl 2-(2-(4-nitrophenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Ethyl 2-(2-p-tolylhydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Ethyl 2-(2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Ethyl 2-(2-(2-acetylphenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Ethyl 2-(2-(2-(hydroxymethyl)phenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Ethyl 2-(2-(4-acetylphenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Ethyl 2-(2-(4-fluorophenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
Isobutyl 2-(2-(4-fluorophenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
65.70 14.67
51.71 17.10
71.43 23.81
90.86 23.02
94.71 26.37
92.86 32.23
43.57 13.86
39.71 5.60
73.57 19.67
71.71 24.41
90.20 24.51
52.0 13.50
47.86 7.37
105.86 28.52
73.86 20.43
116.71 34.87
40.86 6.08
38.57 9.95
49.14 17.89
43.29 14.62
76.43 17.37
110 23.17
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
>0.05
<0.05
>0.05
+0.157
+0.003
À0.197
+0.076
À0.124
+0.114
À0.032
À0.015
À0.199
À0.247
+0.147
+0.299
+0.073
AHE-10 Methyl 2-(2-(3-chlorophenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
AHE-11 Ethyl 4,4,4-trifluoro-2-(2-(4-methoxyphenyl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate 56.86 18.85
AHE-12 Ethyl 2-(2-(naphthalen-1-yl)hydrazono)-3-oxobutanoate
AHE-13 Ethyl 4-(2-(1-ethoxy-1,3-dioxobutan-2-ylidene)hydrazinyl)benzoate
59.29 18.58
27.0 8.16
31.29 11.98
*
P value indicates the level of significance, P <0.05 indicate greater than 95% confidence limit.
and AHE-10 displayed negative OAI which signifies more eggs laid
in the control than in the treated one, hence indicating the com-
pounds to be oviposition deterrent. AHE-10 showed highest ovipo-
sition deterrent activity with OAI À0.247 against Ae. albopictus. The
oviposition response was found to be neutral in case of AHE-2,
AHE-7, AHE-8 and AHE-13 as in these cases, there was no signifi-
cant difference (P >0.05) in egg laying between the treatment and
control. From this study, it was revealed that compounds which
contain hydroxyl group (AHE-4 and AHE-6) or its analog (AHE-
11) attached to phenyl ring or its side chain exhibited moderate
oviposition attractancy to Ae. albopictus females. This was sup-
ported by the fact that mosquitoes possess hygroreceptors in their
body (mainly tarsi25), hence can sense the (active ingredient) vapor
content in an oviposition substrate. On the other hand, compounds
(AHE-8, AHE-9 and AHE-10) containing halogen groups (Cl and F)
displayed moderate to good deterrent properties. In insects,
halogenated analogs were reported as inhibitors of chemical
communication.26
the help in maintenance of the mosquito culture. P.B is thankful to
DRDO, New Delhi, for financial support.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (FT-IR, 1H, 13C NMR, ESI-MS and elemental
analysis) associated with this article can be found, in the online
References and notes
1. Huang, J.; Walker, E. D.; Giroux, P. Y.; Vulule, J.; Miller, J. R. Med. Vet. Entomol.
2005, 19, 442.
2. Bentley, M. D.; Day, J. F. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1989, 34, 401.
3. (a) Trexler, J. D.; Apperson, C. S.; Schal, C. J. Med. Entomol. 1998, 35, 967; (b)
Takken, W.; Knols, B. G. J. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1999, 44, 137; (c) Blackwell, A.;
Johnson, S. N. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2000, 94, 389; (d) Knols, B. G. J.; Sumba,
L. A.; Guda, T. O.; Deng, A. I.; Hassanali, A.; Beier, J. C. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2004,
24, 260.
4. Takken, W. Invertebr. Reprod. Dev. 1999, 36, 67.
From the present study, it was observed that AHE-11 which had
triflouromethyl group in the ester part received more eggs which
can be explained by the presence of methoxy group in the phenyl
ring and thus methoxy group (analog of OH) predominates over
the halogens towards egg laying. Inhibitory activity of the acetyl
group present at ortho and para position of phenyl ring could also
be observed in case of AHE-5 and AHE-7 by their negative OAI va-
lue (À0.124, À0.032). Further it was interesting to note that the
presence of NO2 and COOC2H5 in compound AHE-2 and AHE-13
elicited reduced egg deposition by females.
In conclusion, a series of aryl hydrazono esters (AHE) (1–13)
were synthesized and evaluated for the oviposition responses
against Ae. albopictus for the first time. AHE-12 showed significant
oviposition attractant activity with an oviposition activity index
(OAI) of +0.299 (greater than 95% confidence limit) comparable
to well-reported oviposition attractant for Ae. aegypti, p-cresol
(OAI +0.320). Conversely, AHE-10 exhibited highest oviposition
deterrent activity with OAI À0.247. The present study shows the
potential application of these compounds as oviposition attrac-
tants which may have potential application in mosquito trapping
for identification, surveillance and control.
5. Perry, A. S.; Fay, R. W. Mosq. News 1967, 27, 175.
6. Allan, S. A.; Kline, D. L. J. Med. Entomol. 1998, 35, 943.
7. Ganesan, K.; Mendki, M. J.; Suryanarayana, M. V. S.; Prakash, S.; Malhotra, R. C.
Aust. J. Entomol. 2006, 45, 75.
8. Sharma, K. R.; Seenivasagan, T.; Rao, A. N.; Ganesan, K.; Agarwal, O. P.;
Malhotra, R. C.; Prakash, S. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 1065.
9. (a) Trexler, J. D.; Apperson, C. S.; Zurek, L.; Gemeno, C.; Perich, M. J.; Carlson, D.;
Schal, C. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2003, 19, 228; (b) Trexler, J. D.; Apperson, C.
S.; Zurek, L.; Gemeno, C.; Schal, C.; Kaufman, M.; Walker, E.; Watson, D. W.;
Wallace, L. J. Med. Entomol. 2003, 40, 841.
10. Grant, G. G.; Langevin, D. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 2002, 25, 307.
11. Metcalf, R. L.; Mitchell, W. C.; Fukuto, T. R.; Metcalf, E. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1975, 72, 2501.
12. Hammack, L.; Petroski, R. J. J. Chem. Ecol. 2004, 30, 1809.
13. Jang, E. B.; Casana-Giner, V.; Oliver, J. E. J. Econ. Entomol. 2007, 100, 1124.
14. Sonnet, P. E.; McGovern, T. P.; Cunninghum, R. T. J. Org. Chem. 1984, 49, 4639.
15. Li, S.; Picimbon, J. F.; Ji, S.; Kan, Y.; Chuanling, Q.; Zhou, J. J.; Pelosi, P. Biochem.
Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 372, 464.
16. (a) Sathe, M.; Kaushik, M. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1312; (b) Sathe,
M.; Kaushik, M. P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 4233; (c) Acharya, B. N.;
Saraswat, D.; Tiwari, M.; Shrivastava, A. K.; Ghorpade, R.; Bapna, S.; Kaushik, M.
P. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 430; (d) Sathe, M.; Ghorpade, R.; Kaushik, M. P.
Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 86.
17. (a) Farghaly, T. A.; Abdallah, Z. A. Arkivoc 2008, xvii, 295; (b) Sharma, P.; Kumar,
A.; Sharma, M. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2005, 237, 191.
18. The aromatic amine (1–13) (0.01 mol) was dissolved in a mixture of 4.0 mL of
concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl) and 4.0 mL of distilled water. The amine
hydrochloride solution was kept at freezing temperature. To this, an aqueous
solution of sodium nitrite (NaNO2) 0.69 g (0.01 mol) in 5.0 mL of distilled water
was added dropwise with continuous stirring, keeping the temperature of the
reaction vessel at 0–5 °C. Meanwhile in another beaker, 6.8 g (0.05 mol) of
Acknowledgements
sodium acetate (CH3COONa) in
a solution of 1.53 mL (0.012 mol) ethyl
The authors are thankful to Dr. R. Vijayaraghavan, Director,
DRDE, Gwalior for his keen interest and encouragement. We thank
Mrs. Ruchi Yadav and all the members of Entomology division for
acetoacetate in 25.0 mL of ethyl alcohol was taken and cooled in an ice-bath.
Now the diazotized solution was added to this solution dropwise with
thorough stirring. The reaction mixture was kept overnight, filtered under