Journal of the American Chemical Society
COMMUNICATION
Scheme 3. Plausible Catalytic Cycle
functionalization of the C(sp3)-H bond may be rate-determin-
ing. Highly electron-donating, bulky P(t-Bu)3 may facilitate both
of the C-H activation steps in terms of electron density and steric
environment of the nickel center.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated that N,N-bis(1-arylalk-
yl)formamides undergo an unprecedented dehydrogenative [4
þ 2] cycloaddition reaction with alkynes via nickel/AlMe3
cooperative catalysis through double functionalization of other-
wise unreactive C(sp2)-H and C(sp3)-H bonds to give highly
substituted dihydropyridone derivatives, which can serve as
versatile synthetic precursors for nitrogen-containing six-mem-
bered heterocycles.12 Current efforts are being directed toward
understanding in detail the reaction mechanisms for the two C-
H activation steps and further development of this class of novel
cycloaddition reactions.
’ ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S
Supporting Information. Detailed experimental proce-
b
dures, spectroscopic and analytical data, and crystallographic data
(CIF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
’ AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
yoshiakinakao@npc05.mbox.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp; thiyama@kc.
chuo-u.ac.jp
Some additional experiments were performed to gain mechan-
istic insights into the present cycloaddition reaction. First, the
reaction of isolated hydrocarbamoylation product 4aa under the
reaction conditions gave no trace amount of 3aa, suggesting that
the present cycloaddition reaction is independent of the hydro-
carbamoylation. Second, the reaction of 1a-d, which was deuter-
ated at the formyl C-H bond, with 2f in C6D6 showed the
formation of 3af and 4af-d as well as (Z)-3-deuterio-4,4-
dimethyl-2-pentene10 by 1H NMR analysis of the crude product
(Scheme 2). On the other hand, the identical reaction using 1a-d6
labeled on both methyl groups of 1a gave 3af-d5, 4af-d6, and (Z)-
2-deuterio-4,4-dimethyl-2-pentene10 (Scheme 2). These results
indicate that hydrogenation of the alkyne takes place in a manner
distinct from simple addition of free H2 across alkynes, which
would have led to the formation of identically deuterated (Z)-
4,4-dimethyl-2-pentene.
Present Addresses
†Research & Development Initiative, Chuo University, Bunkyo-
ku, Tokyo 112-8551, Japan.
’ ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We thank Professor Masaki Shimizu for X-ray crystallographic
analysis. This work was financially supported by Grants-in-Aid
for Scientific Research (S) (21225005 to T.H.) and Scientific
Research on Innovative Areas “Molecular Activation Directed
toward Straightforward Synthesis” (22105003 to Y.N.) from
JSPS and MEXT, respectively.
’ REFERENCES
On the basis of these observations, the following catalytic cycle is
proposed (Scheme 3). The formamide coordinated to AlMe3 at
the carbonyl oxygen interacts with an electron-rich nickel(0)
species through η2-coordination to give A, which undergoes
oxidative addition of the formyl C-H bond to give B. Coordina-
tion followed by migratory insertion of the alkyne takes place,
giving D via C. While C-C bond-forming reductive elimination
from D gives the hydrocarbamoylation product 4,9 the sterically
demanding 1-arylalkyl group retards this pathway and induces
C(sp3)-H activation through a concerted cyclometalation, pre-
sumably through a transition state like TSD-E, to give five-
membered nickelacycle E.11 A second migratory insertion of a
coordinating alkyne takes place at the sp-carbon bearing the
bulkier substituent R2 to give seven-membered nickelacycle F,
which reductively eliminates the cycloadduct 3. Decomplexation
of AlMe3 from 3 and its recomplexation with 1 are followed by the
formation of η2-nickel complex A, which reenters the proposed
catalytic cycle. The observed difference in the 3af/4af-d and
3af-d5/4af-d6 ratios (Scheme 2) possibly suggests that the
(1) Cycloaddition Reactions in Organic Synthesis; Kobayashi, S.,
Jørgensen, K. A., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2002.
(2) For reviews, see: (a) Vollhardt, K. P .C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1984, 23, 539. (b) Saito, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100,
2901. (c) Yet, L. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2963. (d) Varela, J. A.; Saꢀa, C.
Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 3787. (e) Croatt, M. P.; Wender, P. A. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2010, 19.
(3) For reviews, see: (a) Zhang, M. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351,
2243. (b) Thansandote, P.; Lautens, M. Chem.—Eur. J. 2009, 15, 5874.
(4) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471.
(5) Burns, N. Z.; Baran, P. S.; Hoffmann, R. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 2854.
(6) Fukutani, T.; Umeda, N.; Hirano, K.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Chem.
Commun. 2009, 5141.
(7) For reviews, see: (a) Chen, X.; Engle, K. M.; Wang, D.-H.; Yu, J.-
Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5094. (b) Jazzar, R.; Hitce, J.;
Renaudat, A.; Sofack-Kreutzer, J.; Baudoin, O. Chem.—Eur. J. 2010, 16,
2646.
(8) For cross-coupling reactions between unreactive C(sp2)-H and
C(sp3)-H bonds, see: (a) Rong, Y.; Li, R.; Lu, W. Organometallics 2007,
3266
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja1102037 |J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3264–3267