[(Scheme_1)TD$FIG]
1052
H.G. Zhang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 22 (2011) 1051–1054
Scheme 1. Regents and conditions: (a) H2SO4/HNO3/KBr, reflux, 2 h, 95%; (b) NH4Ac/CH3COOH, reflux, 3 h, 70%; (c) CH3COOH/C5H10N,
DMF/benzene (90% for 2, 32% for DDVPIP).
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker A Vance 400 MHz instrument. The electrospray mass
spectrum (ES-MS) was determined on an ABI 4000 mass spectrograph. The liner absorption spectra were recorded on
a TU-1800 SPC spectrophotometer. OPEF spectra were obtained on an Edinburgh FLS920 spectrofluorometer. The
fluorescence quantum yields FF was determined by the method in the reference with Cormarin 307 in methanol
(FF = 0.57) was adopted as a reference [13]. TPEF spectra were noted on an OOIBASE32 spectrophotometer. The
pump laser beam came from a mode-locked Ti:sapphire laser system, pulse duration 200 fs, repetition rate of 76 MHz
(Coherent Mira900-D). TPA cross-section (s) was measured using two-photon-induced fluorescence measurement
technique [14] and fluorescein in water with pH 11 was selected as the standard (s = 36 GM) [15].
2-(4-Formylphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline (fmp) 3.24 g (0.01 mol) and dicyanomethylidene-iso-
phorone 1.86 g (0.01 mol) were dissolved in 40 mL DMF, and 1 mL hexahydropyridine (C5H10N), 1 mL glacial acetic
acid (CH3COOH) were added to the solution respectively. Stirring was continued for 1 h at room temperature during
which the reaction mixture become to red slowly. Then 100 mL dry benzene was added and the reaction mixture was
heated under reflux for 8 h. After benzene was distilled off, the residual reaction mixture was cooled to room
temperature and 200 mL water was added, many precipitate was formed. The precipitate was collected through
filtration and recrystallized from ethanol to give red crystals of DDVPIP (1.57 g, 0.0032 mol, 32%). Mp: 154 8C. 1H
NMR (400 MHz, TFA): d 9.50 (d, 2H), 9.30 (d, 2H), 8.34 (q, 2H), 8.18 (d, 2H), 7.87 (d, 2H), 7.27 (q, 2H), 7.01 (s, 1H),
2.67 (s, 2H), 2.56 (s, 2H), 1.09 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, TFA): d 25.49, 31.23, 38.05, 42.39, 75.83, 119.21, 124.33,
124.88, 126.61, 127.79, 128.39, 132.68, 134.44, 135.62, 136.34, 142.50, 146.77, 150.55, 155.86, 173.94. ES-MS
(M++H) m/z (%): Calcd. for C32H24N6 493.7, Found 493.7 (100%).
2. Results and discussion
Variations of liner absorption, OPEF and TPEF spectra of DDVPIP due to acid/base changes were investigated in
mixed neutral solvent: THF/H2O, acidic solvent: THF/0.1 mol/L HCl aqueous solution and basic solvent: THF/
0.1 mol/L NaOH aqueous solution. The mixed ratio in three solvents was 9:1 (v/v). The liner absorption, OPEF and
TPEF spectra of DDVPIP in neutral, acidic and basic solvents were shown in Fig. 1.
As shown in Fig. 1(a), in the neutral THF/H2O, there was one strong absorption band with maxima peak located at
433 nm. But in basic solution, the whole absorption spectra became featureless and much broader with the longer
wavelength absorption was increased while the shorter wavelength absorption was reduced. In the acidic solution, the
maxima peak located at 413 nm and the spectral profile was not changed compared with in neutral solution. As shown
in Fig. 1(b), in the neutral THF/H2O, excited by 360 nm wavelength, DDVPIP emission fluorescence with maxima
peak located at 571 nm. The F is 0.27. Compared with neutral solution, the maxima peak of DDVPIP in basic solution
underwent a blue shift and the strength was enhanced, F increased to 0.53. While in acidic solution, the OPEF spectra
were vanished significantly, F decreased to 0.056. As shown in Fig. 1(c), a similar change of TPEF of DDVPIP took
place as that of OPEF in these solvents. In the neutral THF/H2O, excited by 800 nm wavelength, DDVPIP emission
two-photon fluorescence with the maxima peak at 615 nm, which TPA cross-section was obtained as 46 GM.
Compared with neutral solution, the TPEF of DDVPIP in basic solution was intensified and its maxima peak located at