K. Srinivasan et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 987 (2011) 214–224
223
inclusion complex, [O-AN]0 and [b-CD]0 are the initial concentration
of O-AN and b-CD, respectively.
shifted in b-CD medium similar aqueous medium, it indicating
O-AN molecule entrapped in b-CD cavity. Further it confirmed by
RosMol tool (Scheme 3) [13,14].
A plot of 1/IGꢁ IHG verses 1/[b-CD] gives a straight line for
pH ꢀ 2 and pH ꢀ 7 medium as shown in Fig. 10. Good linear corre-
lations were obtained, confirming that the formation of a 1:1 inclu-
sion complex for pH ꢀ 2 and pH ꢀ 7 solutions. From the intercept
and slope values of this plot binding constant ‘K’ values was eval-
uated, the binding constant for O-AN:b-CD was 417.7 Mꢁ1 and
173 Mꢁ1 in pH ꢀ 2 and pH ꢀ 7 solution. When the b-CD concentra-
tions higher than 10 ꢂ 10ꢁ3 mol dmꢁ3, the oxidation peak current
remain unchanged by further addition of b-CD in pH ꢀ 2 and
pH ꢀ 7 (Fig. 11) solutions. This behavior has been attributed to
the enhanced dissolution of the O-AN molecule through the hydro-
phobic interaction between O-AN and b-CD. These results indicate
that O-AN molecule was entrapped in the b-CD to form inclusion
complex and it proved by electrochemically.
3.5. Electrochemical studies
The formation of the inclusion complex of O-AN and b-CD was
also confirmed by electrochemical method. The electrochemical
behavior of O-AN has been researched in the following same obser-
vation [27]. If b-CD interacted with O-AN, different electrochemical
properties would be observed in Tables 4 and 5.
From Fig. 7 (pH ꢀ 2) and Fig. 8 (pH ꢀ 7) the anodic peak current,
ipa, decreased drastically with increasing the concentration of b-CD
in pH ꢀ 2 and pH ꢀ 7 solution. The anodic peak potential (Epa
)
shifted in positive direction when b-CD is increased in both cases.
The result showed that the inclusion complex between b-CD and
O-AN. The diffusion co-efficient of the inclusion complex from bulk
layer to electrode surface was very slow than that of the O-AN
monomer itself, which leaded the current decrease. On the other
hand, because O-AN monomer entered into the hydrophobic cavity
of b-CD, it was reasonable for that the electrochemical oxidation of
the inclusion complex was more difficult than that of O-AN mono-
mer itself, which would lead the anodic peak potential shift in po-
sitive direction, the anodic peak current, ipa decreased and also
higher activation energy would be observed in both pH ꢀ 2 and
pH ꢀ 7 solutions.
3.6. FT-IR spectral studies
The solid complex formation may be confirmed by FT-IR spec-
troscopy (Fig. 12) because the bands resulting from the included
part of the guest molecule are generally shifted or their intensities
altered [28]. In O-AN the two peaks are observed at 3456.30 cmꢁ1
and 3372.03 cmꢁ1 due to the asymmetric and symmetric stretch-
ing of primary amine. The characteristics peak of –C–N stretching
vibration appeared at 1272 cmꢁ1 for primary aromatic amine.
The characteristics peaks of –C@C– stretching vibration appeared
at 1613.72 cmꢁ1 and 1502.17 cmꢁ1 for aromatic nuclei. For disub-
stituted benzene the peak appeared at 735.1 cmꢁ1. From the
Fig. 12c asymmetric and symmetric peaks of 3456.3 cmꢁ1 and
3372 cmꢁ1 are not observed in this spectrum is due to the primary
amine entrapped in b-CD cavity. This is confirmed by the charac-
teristic –C–N stretching vibration at 1272 cmꢁ1 also not observed,
due to the aniline moiety into the b-CD cavity. The characteristic
stretching vibration of –C@C– at 1613.7 cmꢁ1 and 1502.2 cmꢁ1
intensities are reduced and shifted to 1615.32 cmꢁ1 and
1506.36 cmꢁ1 this is due to the benzene ring entrapped into the
b-CD cavity. The characteristic –C–H stretching vibration of methyl
group (or) –CH3 group appear at 2950.7 cmꢁ1 and 2836.0 cmꢁ1 for
asymmetric and symmetric vibration (Fig. 12b) but these two peak
are not observed in this spectra (Fig. 12c), and the characteristic of
From Tables 4 and 5 the oxidation potential of O-AN is 0.712 V,
0.516 V and the reduction potential is 0.228 V, ꢁ0.101 V in pH ꢀ 2
and pH ꢀ 7 respectively. The difference between the oxidation and
reduction potential is 242 mV and 308 mV for pH ꢀ 2 and pH ꢀ 7
respectively, so this reaction in both pH medium is quasi revers-
ible. Increasing the b-CD concentration from 2 ꢂ 10ꢁ3
M to
12 ꢂ 10ꢁ3M the difference between the oxidation and reduction
potential is increased to 258 mV and 455 mV for pH ꢀ 2 and
pH ꢀ 7 respectively, due to this reaction moves towards irrevers-
ible because O-AN monomer entered into the hydrophobic cavity
of b-CD, it was reasonable for that the electrochemical oxidation
of the inclusion complex was more difficult than that of O-AN itself.
The oxidation potential of O-AN in pH ꢀ 2 is higher (0.712 V)
than pH ꢀ 7 (0.516 V), this is due to the formation of monocation
in pH ꢀ 2, because of this monocation oxidation occurs at higher
potential (0.712 V) and the peak current also increases
(50.34 mV) due to the loss of protonated H+. Fig. 9 shows the rela-
tionship between the anodic peak potential of O-AN and the solu-
tion of various pH. It is found that the potentials (Epa) shifted
negatively with increasing pH, it indicating that protons takes part
in the oxidation process of O-AN at the GCE surface. The anodic
peak potential (Epa) is proportional to the solution pH in the range
of 1–9. The linear-regression equation of O-AN is described as fol-
lowing with a correlation co-efficient of 0.992.
–C–O
stretching
band
appear
at
1220.1 cmꢁ1
and
1340.6 cmꢁ1(Fig. 12b) but in this spectrum the intensity reduced
and shifted to 1222.9 cmꢁ1 and 1330.7 cmꢁ1 (Fig. 12c) because
the O–CH3 group also entrapped into b-CD cavity. This is confirmed
EpaðVÞ ¼ 0:779 ꢁ 0:036pH;
In pH ꢀ 7 the lone pair of electron get oxidized at lower poten-
tial (0.516 V) and peak current also decreases (38.95 mV).The bind-
ing constant K and stoichiometric ratios of the inclusion complex of
O-AN can be determined according to the Benesi–Hildebrand [25]
relation assuming the formation of a 1:1 host–guest inclusion com-
plex between b-CD and O-AN.
K½O-ANꢄ0 I½b-CDꢄ0
where IG is the oxidation peak current of guest molecule of O-AN,
and IHG is the oxidation peak current of inclusion complex of
O-AN:b-CD and IG ꢁ IHG difference between the oxidation peak cur-
rent of O-AN and O-AN:b-CD inclusion complex,
DI is the difference
between the molar peak current co-efficient of O-AN and the
Fig. 13. Powder X-ray diffraction spectra of b-CD and O-AN:b-CD inclusion complex.